• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌筛查中假阳性率的提高和对非预期伤害的高估。

Improved False-Positive Rates and the Overestimation of Unintended Harm from Lung Cancer Screening.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

University Thoracic Surgeons, 1725 W. Harrison St., Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

出版信息

Lung. 2019 Jun;197(3):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00217-4. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00408-019-00217-4
PMID:30980178
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concern over high false-positive rates and the potential for unintended harm to patients is a critical component of the lack of widespread adoption of lung cancer screening.

METHODS

An institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent lung cancer screening between 2/2015 and 2/2018 at Rush University Medical Center and Rush Oak Park Hospital. Reads were executed by dedicated thoracic radiologists and communicated using the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS V.1).

RESULTS

Six hundred and four patients were screened over the study period. We identified 21 primary lung cancers and 8 incidental cancers. We identified a false-positive rate of 17.5%. Only 9 patients underwent further investigative workup for benign disease (5.3%); however, only 4 (2.9%) of those patients were found to have inflammatory or infectious lesions, which are common mimickers of lung cancer. Excluding Lung-RADS category 3 for the purpose of quantifying risk of unintended harm from unnecessary procedures, we found a 6.9% false-positive rate, while diagnosing 25% of all Lung-RADS category 4 patients with primary lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

False-positive rates in lung cancer screening programs continue to decline with improved radiologic expertise. Additionally, false-positive reporting overestimates the risk of unintended harm from further investigative procedures as only a percentage of positive findings are generally considered for tissue diagnosis (i.e., Lung-RADS category 4).

摘要

背景

对高假阳性率以及对患者造成意外伤害的潜在风险的担忧,是肺癌筛查未能广泛应用的关键因素。

方法

本研究使用机构数据库,确定了 2015 年 2 月至 2018 年 2 月在拉什大学医学中心和拉什橡树公园医院接受肺癌筛查的患者。采用专用的胸部放射科医生进行读片,并使用肺影像报告和数据系统(Lung-RADS V.1)进行沟通。

结果

在研究期间,有 604 名患者接受了筛查。我们发现了 21 例原发性肺癌和 8 例偶发性癌症。我们发现假阳性率为 17.5%。仅有 9 名患者因良性疾病接受了进一步的调查性检查(5.3%);然而,只有 4 名(2.9%)患者被发现患有炎症或感染性病变,这些病变是肺癌的常见模拟病变。为了量化不必要程序造成意外伤害的风险,我们排除了 Lung-RADS 类别 3,结果发现假阳性率为 6.9%,同时诊断出 25%的 Lung-RADS 类别 4 患者患有原发性肺癌。

结论

随着放射学专业知识的提高,肺癌筛查计划中的假阳性率继续下降。此外,假阳性报告高估了进一步调查程序造成意外伤害的风险,因为只有一部分阳性发现通常被认为需要进行组织诊断(即 Lung-RADS 类别 4)。

相似文献

1
Improved False-Positive Rates and the Overestimation of Unintended Harm from Lung Cancer Screening.肺癌筛查中假阳性率的提高和对非预期伤害的高估。
Lung. 2019 Jun;197(3):327-332. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00217-4. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
Sequential screening for lung cancer in a high-risk group: randomised controlled trial: LungSEARCH: a randomised controlled trial of Surveillance using sputum and imaging for the EARly detection of lung Cancer in a High-risk group.高危人群肺癌序贯筛查:随机对照试验:LungSEARCH:一项使用痰液和影像学监测的随机对照试验,旨在高危人群中 EARLY 检测肺癌。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Oct 17;54(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00581-2019. Print 2019 Oct.
3
Early Results of Lung Cancer Screening and Radiation Dose Assessment by Low-dose CT at a Community Hospital.社区医院低剂量CT肺癌筛查及辐射剂量评估的早期结果
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;18(5):e327-e331. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
4
Optimizing the Approach to Patients With Pleural Effusion and Radiologic Findings Suspect for Cancer.优化对胸腔积液且影像学表现疑似癌症患者的诊疗方法。
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019 Apr;26(2):114-118. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000537.
5
Radiological, Bronchoscopic and Histopathologic Characteristics of Patients with Primary Lung Cancer in Turkey (2006-2009).土耳其原发性肺癌患者的放射学、支气管镜检查及组织病理学特征(2006 - 2009年)
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(8):1947-52.
6
Occurrence and lung cancer probability of new solid nodules at incidence screening with low-dose CT: analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NELSON trial.低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查中新出现实性结节的发生率和肺癌概率:来自随机、对照 NELSON 试验的数据分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):907-916. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30069-9. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
7
Considering lead-time bias in evaluating the effectiveness of lung cancer screening with real-world data.考虑真实世界数据评估肺癌筛查效果时的领先时间偏倚。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 9;11(1):12180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91852-6.
8
[The role of (18)F-FDG DHC SPECT-CT in the diagnosis and staging for lung cancer].[(18)F-FDG双时相门控单光子发射计算机断层显像-CT在肺癌诊断及分期中的作用]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;30(12):933-6.
9
Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: computed tomography and cervical mediastinoscopy.非小细胞肺癌的纵隔分期:计算机断层扫描和颈部纵隔镜检查
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1995 Sep-Oct;57(5):279-85. doi: 10.1159/000276758.
10
Serum Protein Markers for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer: A Focus on Autoantibodies.用于肺癌早期检测的血清蛋白标志物:聚焦自身抗体
J Proteome Res. 2017 Jan 6;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00559. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based Lung Cancer Screening Results in Relation to Patient and Radiologist Characteristics: The PROSPR Consortium.基于社区的肺癌筛查结果与患者和放射科医生特征的关系:PROSPR 联盟。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Mar;19(3):433-441. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202011-1413OC.
2
Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population.农村肺癌筛查人群中肺癌筛查的障碍、促进因素和建议干预措施。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720930544. doi: 10.1177/2150132720930544.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Lung Cancer Screening and Drivers of Program Efficiency.高危肺癌筛查的成本效益及项目效率的驱动因素。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Aug;12(8):1210-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.021. Epub 2017 May 10.
2
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.美国的低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查——2010 年至 2015 年。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1278-1281. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6416.
3
Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.
在退伍军人健康管理局实施肺癌筛查。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):399-406. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9022.
4
Patients' Attitudes Regarding Lung Cancer Screening and Decision Aids. A Survey and Focus Group Study.患者对肺癌筛查和决策辅助工具的态度。一项调查和焦点小组研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1992-2001. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-289OC.
5
Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians.家庭医生对低剂量计算机断层扫描用于肺癌筛查的了解、态度及使用情况。
Cancer. 2016 Aug 1;122(15):2324-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29944. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
6
Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.学术医疗中心基层医疗服务提供者的低剂量CT肺癌筛查实践与态度
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):664-70. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1241. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Impact of lung cancer screening results on smoking cessation.肺癌筛查结果对戒烟的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju084. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju084. Print 2014 Jun.
8
Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查可降低肺癌死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
9
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.通过乳房X线摄影术筛查乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub4.
10
Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer.肺癌吸烟相关风险中的种族差异。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):333-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033250.