ArRejaie Aws, Alsuliman Saleh A, Aljohani Mohammed O, Altamimi Hesham A, Alshwaimi Emad, Al-Thobity Ahmad M
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11544, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Dent J. 2019 Apr;31(2):236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT).
Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (MultiCore® Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with μCT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05).
The study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05).
There was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found.
本研究旨在通过显微计算机断层扫描(μCT)确定使用两种不同粘结材料和技术的粘结预制纤维桩周围间隙和空洞形成的差异。
将带有预制纤维桩(RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D)的标准化丙烯酸树脂根(N = 40)根据多种粘结材料和技术分为四组(n = 10)。第一组,通过根管尖将树脂粘结剂(RelyX™ Unicem)插入根管。第二组,注入相同的粘结剂,并使用微刷在根管内分布粘结剂。第三组,使用根管尖将双聚合树脂粘结剂(MultiCore® Flow)注入根管。第四组,注入相同的粘结剂,并使用微刷在根管内分布粘结剂。用μCT评估粘结剂和根管内的间隙和空洞形成情况。使用IBM SPSS Statistics进行统计评估,然后进行正态性的柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯H检验,以比较这些变量在所有组中的显著差异(α = 0.05)。
在评估各实验组内的间隙和空洞形成时,研究未发现显著差异(P > 0.05)。
所有测试样本内部均有一定量的空洞和间隙形成。然而,未发现显著差异。