Saifi Comron, Cazzulino Alejandro, Laratta Joseph, Save Akshay V, Shillingford Jamal N, Louie Philip K, Pugely Andrew J, Arlet Vincent
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):185-190. doi: 10.1177/2192568218790557. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
Retrospective database study.
To analyze the economic and age data concerning primary and revision posterolateral fusion (PLF) and posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) throughout the United States to improve value-based care and health care utilization.
The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for patients who underwent primary or revision PLF and PLIF/TLIF between 2011 and 2014. Age and economic data included number of procedures, costs, and revision burden. The National Inpatient Sample database represents a 20% sample of discharges from US hospitals weighted to provide national estimates.
From 2011 to 2014, the annual number of PLF and PLIF/TLIF procedures decreased 18% and increased 23%, respectively, in the Unites States. During the same period, the number of revision PLF decreased 19%, while revision PLIF/TLIF remained relatively unchanged. The average cost of PLF was lower than the average cost of PLIF/TLIF. The aggregate national cost for PLF was more than $3 billion, while PLIF/TLIF totaled less than $2 billion. Revision burden (ratio of revision surgeries to the sum of both revision and primary surgeries) remained constant at 8.0% for PLF while it declined from 3.2% to 2.9% for PLIF/TLIF.
This study demonstrated a steady increase in PLIF/TLIF, while PLF alone decreased. The increasing number of PLIF/TLIF procedures may account for the apparent decline of PLF procedures. There was a higher average cost for PLIF/TLIF as compared with PLF. Revision burden remained unchanged for PLF but declined for PLIF/TLIF, implying a decreased need for revision procedures following the initial PLIF/TLIF surgery.
回顾性数据库研究。
分析全美国初次及翻修后路外侧融合术(PLF)和后路/经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF/TLIF)的经济和年龄数据,以改善基于价值的医疗服务和医疗保健利用情况。
通过国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本编码,查询2011年至2014年间接受初次或翻修PLF及PLIF/TLIF手术患者的国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库。年龄和经济数据包括手术数量、费用和翻修负担。国家住院患者样本数据库代表美国医院20%的出院病例样本,并进行加权处理以提供全国估计数据。
2011年至2014年期间,美国PLF手术的年数量下降了18%,而PLIF/TLIF手术的年数量增加了23%。同期,翻修PLF手术的数量下降了19%,而翻修PLIF/TLIF手术的数量相对保持不变。PLF的平均费用低于PLIF/TLIF的平均费用。PLF的全国总费用超过30亿美元,而PLIF/TLIF的总费用不到20亿美元。PLF的翻修负担(翻修手术与翻修手术和初次手术总和的比率)保持在8.0%不变,而PLIF/TLIF的翻修负担从3.2%降至2.9%。
本研究表明PLIF/TLIF稳步增加,而单纯PLF减少。PLIF/TLIF手术数量的增加可能是PLF手术明显下降的原因。与PLF相比,PLIF/TLIF的平均费用更高。PLF的翻修负担保持不变,但PLIF/TLIF的翻修负担下降,这意味着初次PLIF/TLIF手术后翻修手术的需求减少。