Suppr超能文献

一项针对直径小于5毫米的尿路结石患者中闪烁伪像与计算机断层扫描相比的临床准确性的调查。

An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning.

作者信息

Hanafi Mohammad Qasem, Fakhrizadeh Ahmad, Jaafaezadeh Esmat

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Feb;8(2):401-406. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes ( = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients ( = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones ( = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm.

摘要

背景

超声(US)是用于诊断尿路结石的一种非侵入性方法。如果结石尺寸<5mm,可能难以诊断。本研究旨在比较彩色多普勒超声成像的闪烁伪像(TA)与非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)检测<5mm尿路结石的准确性。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性研究于2018年对100例疑似肾结石并前往阿瓦士伊玛目霍梅尼医院急诊室就诊的患者进行。以CT检查结果作为金标准,检查超声检查结果如后方声影和TA检测尿路结石(最大直径≤5mm)的能力。

结果

CT检查中肾结石的平均尺寸为3.43±0.80mm,彩色多普勒超声检查中为3.49±0.82mm。CT和彩色多普勒超声在尿路结石尺寸量化报告方面无显著差异(P = 0.603)。彩色多普勒超声检查中94例(94%)患者检测到TA,而83例(83%)患者检测到后方声影(P = 0.004)。TA与结石尺寸之间存在显著差异(P = 0.036)。TA检测结石的敏感性、准确性和阳性预测值分别为94%、94%和100%。

结论

结果表明,彩色多普勒超声检查中的TA可能是一种良好且安全的替代成像方式,在敏感检测<5mm尿路结石方面与非增强计算机断层扫描结果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d9/6436258/ef9537470575/JFMPC-8-401-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验