Suppr超能文献

判断不同任务的主观难度。

Judging the subjective difficulty of different kinds of tasks.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Aug;45(8):983-994. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000653. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

Abstract

People judge the relative difficulty of different kinds of tasks all the time, yet little is known about how they do so. We asked university students to choose between tasks that taxed perceptual-motor control and memorization to different degrees. Our participants decided whether to carry a box through a wide (81 cm) or narrow (36 cm) gap after memorizing six, seven, or eight digits. The model that maximized the likelihood of observing the choice data treated the extra physical demand of passing through the narrow gap as functionally equivalent to memorizing an extra .55 digits. Substantively, the model suggested that participants judged the difficulty of the compound tasks in terms of separate resources. The approach introduced here may help interrelate different kinds of task difficulty. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人们一直在评判不同类型任务的相对难度,但对于他们是如何做到这一点的却知之甚少。我们要求大学生在需要不同程度感知运动控制和记忆的任务之间做出选择。我们的参与者在记住六个、七个或八个数字后,决定是要穿过一个 81 厘米宽还是 36 厘米宽的缝隙来搬运一个盒子。使观察到的选择数据的可能性最大化的模型将通过狭窄缝隙的额外物理需求视为等同于额外记忆 0.55 个数字。从实质上讲,该模型表明参与者根据独立的资源来判断复合任务的难度。这里介绍的方法可以帮助将不同类型的任务难度联系起来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验