Suppr超能文献

高压氧疗法治疗坏死性软组织感染疗效的证据不足:系统评价。

Scarce evidence of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in necrotizing soft tissue infection: a systematic review.

机构信息

a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.

b Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery , Aalborg University Hospital , Aalborg , Denmark.

出版信息

Infect Dis (Lond). 2019 Jul;51(7):485-492. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1597983. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) is a rare and potentially life-threatening disease. Rapid surgical intervention, antibiotics and intensive care are the mainstay of treatment. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is used as adjuvant therapy in some centres but there is a lack of research-based evidence of efficacy. Following the PRISMA guideline we conducted a systematic review on the efficacy of HBOT on NSTI with mortality as primary outcome. Through January 2019 major databases were searched and relevant literature assessed. The criteria for study inclusion were research of any design and any period of time comparing HBOT . non-HBOT in a population of NSTI-patients. Studies were analysed using the modified Delphi method and risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions tool. Relative risk (RR) on mortality was calculated for each study individually. A number of 1733 studies were identified through database search. Ultimately, 21 studies were included of which 19 were case series with a control group. The majority of the studies performed poor in quality assessment and all featured a high to critical risk of bias. The association of HBOT on mortality was generally reported as positive, however, the results should be considered with great scepticism. The evidence of HBOT in NSTI is poor and biased. There is a strong need for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to shed light on a potential life-saving treatment.

摘要

坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)是一种罕见且潜在威胁生命的疾病。快速手术干预、抗生素和重症监护是治疗的主要方法。高压氧治疗(HBOT)在一些中心被用作辅助治疗,但缺乏基于研究的疗效证据。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们对 HBOT 治疗 NSTI 的疗效进行了系统评价,以死亡率为主要结局。通过 2019 年 1 月,我们对主要数据库进行了搜索,并对相关文献进行了评估。纳入研究的标准是任何设计和任何时间段的研究,比较了 HBOT 与 NSTI 患者的非 HBOT。使用改良 Delphi 方法和非随机干预研究的偏倚风险工具对研究进行了分析。对死亡率进行了单独的相对风险(RR)计算。通过数据库搜索发现了 1733 项研究。最终,纳入了 21 项研究,其中 19 项为病例系列,有对照组。大多数研究的质量评估较差,且均存在高度至关键偏倚风险。HBOT 对死亡率的影响通常被报告为阳性,但结果应持怀疑态度。HBOT 治疗 NSTI 的证据不足且存在偏倚。非常需要随机对照试验(RCT)来阐明这种潜在的救生治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验