Department of Anorectum, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Mar 25;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00490-y.
To determine the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) in the treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI), we conducted a meta-analysis of the available evidence.
Data sources were PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and reference lists. The study included observational trials that compared HBO with non-HBO, or standard care. The primary outcome was the mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were the number of debridement, amputation rate and complication rate. Relative risks or standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively.
A total of retrospective cohort and case-control studies were included, including 49,152 patients, 1448 who received HBO and 47,704 in control. The mortality rate in the HBO group was significantly lower than that in the non-HBO group [RR = 0.522, 95% CI (0.403, 0.677), p < 0.05]. However, the number of debridements performed in the HBO group was higher than in the non-HBO group [SMD = 0.611, 95% CI (0.012, 1.211), p < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in amputation rates between the two groups [RR = 0.836, 95% CI (0.619, 1.129), p > 0.05]. In terms of complications, the incidence of MODS was lower in the HBO group than in the non-HBO group [RR = 0.205, 95% CI (0.164, 0.256), p < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications, such as sepsis, shock, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia, between the two groups (p > 0.05).
The current evidence suggests that the use of HBO in the treatment of NSTI can significantly reduce the mortality rates and the incidence rates of complications. However, due to the retrospective nature of the studies, the evidence is weak, and further research is needed to establish its efficacy. It is also important to note that HBO is not available in all hospitals, and its use should be carefully considered based on the patient's individual circumstances. Additionally, it is still worthwhile to stress the significance of promptly evaluating surgical risks to prevent missing the optimal treatment time.
为了确定高压氧治疗(HBO)治疗坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)的疗效,我们对现有证据进行了荟萃分析。
数据来源为 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和参考文献列表。研究包括比较 HBO 与非 HBO 或标准治疗的观察性试验。主要结局是死亡率。次要结局是清创术的数量、截肢率和并发症发生率。二分类和连续结局分别计算相对风险或标准化均数差及其 95%置信区间。
共纳入回顾性队列和病例对照研究,共 49152 例患者,1448 例接受 HBO,47704 例在对照组。HBO 组的死亡率明显低于非 HBO 组[RR=0.522,95%CI(0.403,0.677),p<0.05]。然而,HBO 组行清创术的次数多于非 HBO 组[SMD=0.611,95%CI(0.012,1.211),p<0.05]。两组截肢率无显著性差异[RR=0.836,95%CI(0.619,1.129),p>0.05]。关于并发症,HBO 组 MODS 的发生率低于非 HBO 组[RR=0.205,95%CI(0.164,0.256),p<0.05]。两组其他并发症(如败血症、休克、心肌梗死、肺栓塞和肺炎)的发生率无显著性差异(p>0.05)。
目前的证据表明,HBO 治疗 NSTI 可显著降低死亡率和并发症发生率。然而,由于研究的回顾性,证据较弱,需要进一步研究以确定其疗效。还需要注意的是,并非所有医院都提供 HBO,应根据患者的具体情况仔细考虑其使用。此外,强调及时评估手术风险以防止错过最佳治疗时间仍然很重要。