• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A PRO-cision Medicine Methods Toolkit to Address the Challenges of Personalizing Cancer Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: Introduction to the Supplement.使用患者报告结局来应对癌症个体化治疗挑战的精准医学方法工具包:增刊介绍。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1(Suppl 5 1):S1-S7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001089.
2
Promoting effective use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: themes from a "Methods Tool kit" paper series.促进患者报告结局在临床实践中的有效应用:“方法工具包”系列论文的主题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.022. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
3
A PRO-cision medicine intervention to personalize cancer care using patient-reported outcomes: intervention development and feasibility-testing.采用患者报告结局进行精准医学干预以实现癌症个体化护理:干预措施的制定和可行性测试。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2341-2355. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03093-3. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Interpreting and Acting on the PRO Scores From the Patient-reported Outcomes for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) eHealth System.解读并应用患者报告的个性化治疗和护理结局(PROMPT-Care)电子健康系统的 PRO 评分。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S85-S91. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001094.
5
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.利用利益相关者参与克服癌症护理提供中实施患者报告结局(PROs)的障碍:来自 3 项前瞻性研究的方法。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S92-S99. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001103.
6
Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology.推进患者报告结局在实践中的应用:了解挑战、机遇和健康信息技术的潜力。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1575-1583. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02112-0. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care.使用患者报告结局(PROs)和患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在常规癌症护理中的障碍综述。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Jun;68(2):186-195. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.421. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
8
Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries.整合患者报告结局在临床实践和绩效评估中的应用:来自三个国家的专家观点
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):754-75. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12091.
9
Integration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for personalized symptom management in "real-world" oncology practices: a population-based cohort comparison study of impact on healthcare utilization.将患者报告的结局 (PROs) 整合到“真实世界”肿瘤学实践中的个性化症状管理中:基于人群的队列比较研究对医疗保健利用的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4933-4942. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05313-3. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.癌症患者中用于个性化治疗和护理的患者报告结局测量收集与利用电子健康系统(PROMPT-Care):评估可行性和可接受性的混合方法
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 2;19(10):e330. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8360.

引用本文的文献

1
Redefining Success in Hernia Surgery: The Case for Patient-Reported Outcomes.重新定义疝气手术的成功:以患者报告的结果为例
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 29;14(17):6131. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176131.
2
The current use and application of thresholds for clinical importance of the EORTC QLQ-C30, the EORTC CAT core and the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL- a systematic scoping review.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织CAT核心量表以及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C15-PAL临床重要性阈值的当前使用与应用——一项系统的范围综述
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jun 3;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02387-7.
3
A Consistent Lack of Consistency: Definitions, Evidentiary Expectations and Potential Use of Meaningful Change Data in Clinical Outcome Assessments Across Stakeholders. Results from a DIA Working Group Literature Review and Survey.始终缺乏一致性:临床结局评估中有意义变化数据的定义、证据期望及潜在用途。DIA工作组文献综述与调查结果
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):337-348. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00739-x. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
4
Using the Translational Science Benefits Model to assess the impact of the Penn Implementation Science Center in Cancer Control.运用转化科学效益模型评估宾夕法尼亚癌症控制实施科学中心的影响。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 16;8(1):e166. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.554. eCollection 2024.
5
A Framework to Promote Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Institutions Caring for Vulnerable and Underserved Cancer Populations.促进在照顾弱势和服务不足癌症人群的机构中实施患者报告结局的框架。
Patient. 2025 Jan;18(1):89-95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00703-9. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
6
Patient and Provider Perspectives About the Use of Patient-Generated Health Data During Pregnancy: Qualitative Exploratory Study.患者与医疗服务提供者对孕期使用患者生成的健康数据的看法:定性探索性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 8;8:e52397. doi: 10.2196/52397.
7
The Diagnostic Landscape of Adult Neurogenetic Disorders.成人神经遗传性疾病的诊断概况
Biology (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;12(12):1459. doi: 10.3390/biology12121459.
8
Paving the way for patient centricity in real-world evidence (RWE): Qualitative interviews to identify considerations for wider implementation of patient-reported outcomes in RWE generation.为真实世界证据(RWE)中的以患者为中心铺平道路:定性访谈以确定在生成RWE时更广泛实施患者报告结果的考量因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 14;9(9):e20157. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20157. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
A powerful partnership: researchers and patients working together to develop a patient-facing summary of clinical trial outcome data.强强联手:研究人员与患者携手合作,开发临床试验结果数据面向患者的摘要。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):363-374. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad099.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: Facilitating and Enhancing the Reporting of Symptoms, Adverse Events, and Subjective Benefit of Treatment in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice.卵巢癌患者报告结局:促进和加强临床试验及临床实践中症状、不良事件和治疗主观获益的报告
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2023 May 8;14:111-126. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S297301. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.利用利益相关者参与克服癌症护理提供中实施患者报告结局(PROs)的障碍:来自 3 项前瞻性研究的方法。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S92-S99. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001103.
2
Interpreting and Acting on the PRO Scores From the Patient-reported Outcomes for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) eHealth System.解读并应用患者报告的个性化治疗和护理结局(PROMPT-Care)电子健康系统的 PRO 评分。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S85-S91. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001094.
3
A Decade in Review: Cancer Care Ontario's Approach to Symptom Assessment and Management.十年回顾:安大略省癌症护理中心的症状评估和管理方法。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S80-S84. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001084.
4
A Case Management System for Integrating Patient-reported Outcome Assessment in Clinical Practice: The Beacon Tool.用于将患者报告的结局评估整合到临床实践中的病例管理系统:Beacon 工具。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S73-S79. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001095.
5
Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Online Reporting of Adverse Effects During Chemotherapy for Cancer: The eRAPID System (Electronic Patient Self-Reporting of Adverse Events: Patient Information and aDvice).参与癌症化疗期间不良反应在线报告的患者和临床医生:eRAPID 系统(电子患者自我报告不良反应:患者信息和建议)。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S59-S65. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001085.
6
Options for the Interpretation of and Recommendations for Acting on Different PROMs in Daily Clinical Practice Using KLIK.在日常临床实践中使用 KLIK 对不同 PROMs 的解读和处理建议的选择。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S52-S58. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001061.
7
Interpreting and Acting on PRO Results in Clinical Practice: Lessons Learned From the PatientViewpoint System and Beyond.在临床实践中解读和应用 PRO 结果:从 PatientViewpoint 系统及其他方面获得的经验教训。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1(Suppl 5 1):S46-S51. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001086.
8
Can Methods Developed for Interpreting Group-level Patient-reported Outcome Data be Applied to Individual Patient Management?用于解释群组水平患者报告结局数据的方法能否应用于个体患者管理?
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1(Suppl 5 1):S38-S45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001111.
9
Turning Feed-forward and Feedback Processes on Patient-reported Data into Intelligent Action and Informed Decision-making: Case Studies and Principles.将基于患者报告数据的前馈和反馈过程转化为智能行动和知情决策:案例研究与原则。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S31-S37. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001088.
10
Applying PRO Reference Values to Communicate Clinically Relevant Information at the Point-of-care.应用 PRO 参考值在床边即时沟通具有临床相关性的信息。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S24-S30. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001113.

使用患者报告结局来应对癌症个体化治疗挑战的精准医学方法工具包:增刊介绍。

A PRO-cision Medicine Methods Toolkit to Address the Challenges of Personalizing Cancer Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: Introduction to the Supplement.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

出版信息

Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1(Suppl 5 1):S1-S7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001089.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001089
PMID:30985589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400766/
Abstract

Patients are increasingly being asked to complete standardized, validated questionnaires with regard to their symptoms, functioning, and well-being [ie, patient-reported outcomes (PROs)] as part of routine care. These PROs can be used to inform patients' care and management, which we refer to as "PRO-cision Medicine." For PRO-cision Medicine to be most effective, clinicians and patients need to be able to understand what the PRO scores mean and how to act on the PRO results. The papers in this supplement to Medical Care describe various methods that have been used to address these issues. Specifically, the supplement includes 14 papers: 6 describe different methods for interpreting PROs and 8 describe how different PRO systems have addressed interpreting PRO scores and/or acting on PRO results. As such, this "Methods Toolkit" can inform clinicians and researchers aiming to implement routine PRO reporting into clinical practice by providing methodological fundamentals and real-world examples to promote personalized patient care.

摘要

患者被越来越多地要求完成关于其症状、功能和幸福感的标准化、经过验证的问卷,即患者报告的结果(PROs),作为常规护理的一部分。这些 PROs 可用于为患者的护理和管理提供信息,我们称之为“PRO-cision Medicine”。为了使 PRO-cision Medicine 最有效,临床医生和患者需要能够理解 PRO 评分的含义以及如何根据 PRO 结果采取行动。医疗保健增刊中的这些论文描述了已用于解决这些问题的各种方法。具体来说,该增刊包括 14 篇论文:6 篇描述了解释 PRO 的不同方法,8 篇描述了不同的 PRO 系统如何解决解释 PRO 评分和/或根据 PRO 结果采取行动的问题。因此,这个“方法工具包”可以为旨在将常规 PRO 报告纳入临床实践的临床医生和研究人员提供方法学基础和实际示例,以促进个性化的患者护理。