Simonetti I, Trivella M G, Michelassi C, Parodi O, De Nes D M, L'Abbate A
Eur Heart J. 1986 Oct;7(10):848-58. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061971.
The effect of various doses of intracoronary verapamil on the diameter of angiographically normal left coronary artery segments was investigated in 22 patients with and without coronary atherosclerosis by quantitative angiography. Very low doses (50 micrograms) were given in 3 patients; doses of 250 micrograms, 350 micrograms and 500 micrograms were administered in 7, 6 and 13 patients, respectively. A single dose was administered in 15 patients, while two increasing doses of verapamil were tested in 7. The effect of verapamil was compared in each patient with that of nitroglycerin (NG; 0.6 mg), administered sublingually in all as the last step of the study. An additional group of 8 patients served as the control. These patients received 4 intracoronary injections of contrast medium without drugs and a fifth injection following 0.6 mg of sublingual NG. In the control group no significant changes in coronary artery diameter were observed following the four control injections of contrast medium, while a 18 +/- 9% increase in vascular diameter was observed following NG. When verapamil was injected a dose-dependent vasodilation was observed, which began to be significant with doses higher than 250 micrograms. Mean percent variations of coronary artery diameter relative to control were -0.2 +/- 3.6%, 4.6 +/- 5.5%, 11.4 +/- 7.5% and 19.9 +/- 10.7%, in response to verapamil doses of 50, 250, 350 and 500 micrograms, respectively. Subsequent nitroglycerin induced a 21.5 +/- 10.7% mean percent coronary artery dilation (NS vs verapamil 500 micrograms and vs NG in the control group). Thus, verapamil induced a dose-dependent coronary vasodilation which at a dose of 500 micrograms was comparable to that induced by NG. Both with verapamil and NG the smallest vessels exhibited the greatest vasodilation. It is concluded that at the doses used in this study, injection of verapamil into the left coronary artery is safe and markedly decreases tone in the large coronary arteries. This finding supports the use of verapamil in clinical conditions in which the role of coronary vasoconstriction is proven or thought to be relevant.
通过定量血管造影术,在22例有或无冠状动脉粥样硬化的患者中研究了不同剂量冠状动脉内注射维拉帕米对血管造影显示正常的左冠状动脉节段直径的影响。3例患者给予极低剂量(50微克);7例、6例和13例患者分别给予250微克、350微克和500微克的剂量。15例患者给予单次剂量,7例患者测试了两次递增剂量的维拉帕米。在每名患者中,将维拉帕米的效果与硝酸甘油(NG;0.6毫克)的效果进行比较,所有患者均在研究的最后一步舌下含服硝酸甘油。另外8例患者作为对照组。这些患者接受4次冠状动脉内注射造影剂且无药物,在舌下含服0.6毫克硝酸甘油后进行第5次注射。在对照组中,4次对照注射造影剂后未观察到冠状动脉直径有显著变化,而舌下含服硝酸甘油后观察到血管直径增加了18±9%。注射维拉帕米时观察到剂量依赖性血管舒张,剂量高于250微克时开始显著。相对于对照组,冠状动脉直径的平均百分比变化分别为:维拉帕米剂量为50微克时为-0.2±3.6%,250微克时为4.6±5.5%,350微克时为11.4±7.5%,500微克时为19.9±10.7%。随后的硝酸甘油诱导冠状动脉平均直径扩张21.5±10.7%(与维拉帕米500微克及对照组硝酸甘油相比无统计学差异)。因此,维拉帕米诱导剂量依赖性冠状动脉舒张,500微克剂量时与硝酸甘油诱导的舒张效果相当。维拉帕米和硝酸甘油二者均使最小的血管表现出最大的舒张。结论是,在本研究使用的剂量下,将维拉帕米注入左冠状动脉是安全的,且能显著降低大冠状动脉的张力。这一发现支持在已证实或认为冠状动脉血管收缩起作用的临床情况下使用维拉帕米。