• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据硬度百分比用于乳腺肿块鉴别诊断的应变直方图。

Strain histograms used for differential diagnosis of breast masses according to hardness percentage.

作者信息

Xue Yan, Zou Hongsheng, Ou Yang, Li Sheng, Zhao Yuehuan, Li Yun, Li Yunling

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Jinan Child Hospital, Jinan.

Department of SICU, People's Hospital of Rongcheng, Rongcheng.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(15):e15125. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015125.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000015125
PMID:30985674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6485793/
Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of percentage of hard component (PHC) versus strain ratio (SR) in focal breast lesion diagnosis.Ultrasonography and elastography images of 245 malignant and 255 benign breast lesions were obtained and analyzed according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System of the American College of Radiology. PHC and SR were measured for each lesion and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound (CU) only, PHC with CU, and SR with CU.Mean PHC differed significantly between malignant (90.46 ± 13.29) and benign (62.03 ± 25.61) lesions. Mean SR differed significantly between malignant (4.61 ± 1.75) and benign (2.34 ± 1.80) lesions. ROC curve threshold values were 82.45 for PHC and 2.69 for SR. The area under the curve values for CU, SR with CU, and PHC with CU were 0.956, 0.960, and 0.956, respectively, with no significant differences among them (P < .05).PHC was comparable to SR for differentiating malignant from benign breast masses and may be an auxiliary tool for breast lesion stiffness evaluation. ROC data for CU, SR with CU, and PHC with CU were statistically similar.

摘要

评估乳腺局灶性病变诊断中硬成分百分比(PHC)与应变率(SR)的诊断性能。获取了245例恶性和255例良性乳腺病变的超声及弹性成像图像,并根据美国放射学会的乳腺影像报告和数据系统进行分析。测量每个病变的PHC和SR,并进行受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以评估和比较单纯常规超声(CU)、PHC联合CU以及SR联合CU的诊断性能。恶性病变(90.46±13.29)与良性病变(62.03±25.61)的平均PHC差异有统计学意义。恶性病变(4.61±1.75)与良性病变(2.34±1.80)的平均SR差异有统计学意义。PHC的ROC曲线阈值为82.45,SR的为2.69。CU、SR联合CU以及PHC联合CU的曲线下面积值分别为0.956、0.960和0.956,它们之间无显著差异(P<0.05)。在区分乳腺良恶性肿块方面,PHC与SR相当,可能是评估乳腺病变硬度的辅助工具。CU、SR联合CU以及PHC联合CU的ROC数据在统计学上相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/1a39cccafff9/medi-98-e15125-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/6ee539b4032e/medi-98-e15125-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/b3f11dda0d75/medi-98-e15125-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/2af5386489ec/medi-98-e15125-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/c4a2a4d1e74e/medi-98-e15125-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/87213e2df3ec/medi-98-e15125-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/12df5645f90a/medi-98-e15125-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/a6e253fcde78/medi-98-e15125-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/1a39cccafff9/medi-98-e15125-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/6ee539b4032e/medi-98-e15125-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/b3f11dda0d75/medi-98-e15125-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/2af5386489ec/medi-98-e15125-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/c4a2a4d1e74e/medi-98-e15125-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/87213e2df3ec/medi-98-e15125-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/12df5645f90a/medi-98-e15125-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/a6e253fcde78/medi-98-e15125-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/725c/6485793/1a39cccafff9/medi-98-e15125-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Strain histograms used for differential diagnosis of breast masses according to hardness percentage.根据硬度百分比用于乳腺肿块鉴别诊断的应变直方图。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(15):e15125. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015125.
2
Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块:影响超声弹性应变比值的因素。
Ultraschall Med. 2013 Apr;34(2):131-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313168. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
3
Shear wave versus strain elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.剪切波与应变成像弹性技术在鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的应用。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 24;49(5):1509-1517. doi: 10.3906/sag-1905-15.
4
Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.三维与二维剪切波弹性成像鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的比较:聚焦于诊断性能
Clin Radiol. 2017 Oct;72(10):878-886. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 16.
5
Elastography ultrasound for breast lesions: fat-to-lesion strain ratio vs gland-to-lesion strain ratio.超声弹性成像在乳腺病变中的应用:脂肪-病变应变比与腺体-病变应变比。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3171-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3366-8. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
6
Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.不可触及的乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别:超声弹性成像中计算机辅助定量与病变硬度视觉评估的比较
Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):9-14. doi: 10.3109/02841850903273966.
7
Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.通过定量评估比较和联合应用乳腺肿块的应变弹性成像与剪切波弹性成像以鉴别良恶性病变:初步研究
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jan;37(1):99-109. doi: 10.1002/jum.14309. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.评估乳腺应变弹性成像在导管内病变中的应用价值。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2021 Jan;48(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s10396-020-01070-2. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
9
Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.弹性成像技术在小乳房肿块中的作用和临床应用价值。
Acad Radiol. 2011 Jan;18(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
10
Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.乳腺病变中定性和半定量应变弹性成像诊断准确性的比较。
Cancer Imaging. 2016 May 26;16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40644-016-0070-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast cancer imaging-clinical experience with two-dimensional-shear wave elastography: A retrospective study.乳腺癌成像——二维剪切波弹性成像的临床经验:一项回顾性研究。
World J Radiol. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):528-536. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i10.528.
2
Diagnostic and Predictive Values of Strain Ratios in the Regions of Interests in Reference Tissue for Breast Tumor.乳腺肿瘤参考组织感兴趣区域应变率的诊断及预测价值
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 4;13:1017-1028. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S292944. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Strain histograms are equal to strain ratios in predicting malignancy in breast tumours.应变直方图在预测乳腺肿瘤的恶性程度方面与应变率相当。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186230. eCollection 2017.
2
Implementation of Elastography Score and Strain Ratio in Combination with B-Mode Ultrasound Avoids Unnecessary Biopsies of Breast Lesions.弹性成像评分和应变率与B超联合应用可避免不必要的乳腺病变活检。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Apr;43(4):804-816. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.11.019. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
3
Elastography Complements Ultrasound as Principle Modality in Breast Lesion Assessment.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(2):119-124. doi: 10.1159/000445746. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
4
Ultrasound Elastography Combined With BI-RADS-US Classification System: Is It Helpful for the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography?超声弹性成像联合BI-RADS-US分类系统:对传统超声的诊断性能有帮助吗?
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Jun;16(3):e33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Influence of region of interest size and ultrasound lesion size on the performance of 2D shear wave elastography (SWE) in solid breast masses.感兴趣区大小和超声病灶大小对二维剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在实性乳腺肿块中性能的影响。
Clin Radiol. 2015 Dec;70(12):1421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
Influence of various breast factors on the quality of strain elastograms.各种乳腺因素对应变弹性成像质量的影响。
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Mar;34(3):395-400. doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.3.395.
7
Elastography ultrasound for breast lesions: fat-to-lesion strain ratio vs gland-to-lesion strain ratio.超声弹性成像在乳腺病变中的应用:脂肪-病变应变比与腺体-病变应变比。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3171-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3366-8. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
8
Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.弹性成像 5 分评分法和应变率比值法诊断实性乳腺病变。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
9
Differential diagnosis of breast lesions using ultrasound elastography.使用超声弹性成像对乳腺病变进行鉴别诊断。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011 Oct;21(4):301-5. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.90697.
10
Ultrasonographic differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions: a meta-analytic comparison of elasticity and BIRADS scoring.超声鉴别乳腺良恶性病灶:弹性成像与 BI-RADS 评分的荟萃分析比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 May;133(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1857-8. Epub 2011 Nov 5.