• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计并评估格鲁吉亚结核病关怀提供者基于成果的融资:一个实际评估方案。

Designing and evaluating provider results-based financing for tuberculosis care in Georgia: a realist evaluation protocol.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Health Systems and Equity Unit, Antwerp, Belgium.

Curatio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 14;9(4):e030257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030257.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030257
PMID:30987995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500265/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2016, Georgian researchers and policymakers were developing a policy to improve the performance of the national tuberculosis (TB) control programme. The research programme 'Designing and Evaluating Provider Results-Based Financing for Tuberculosis Care in Georgia: Understanding Costs, Mechanisms of Effect and Impact (Results4TB)' was initiated to inform the policy formulation phase, document the policy implementation and assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and the processes of change. To achieve this, the research team intends to combine an impact evaluation, a cost-effectiveness study and a realist evaluation (RE) within an overarching theory-informed design. This protocol is the RE component of the programme.

METHODS

A realist methodological approach will be adopted to guide the research design and evaluation. RE answers the question of 'what works in which conditions for whom?' and starts with the development of an initial programme theory (IPT). The IPT will feed into other phases of the realist research cycle (study design, data collection, data analysis and synthesis and theory refinement). Data will be collected in a multiple embedded case study design (five intervention and three control sites) through document reviews, in-depth interviews, non-participant observations and context mapping at facility and national levels. Additional data from other research components (cost-effectiveness and impact evaluation) will aid data triangulation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Institutional Review Boards of the National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health in Georgia (ref. IRB # 2018-019) and the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp (ref. IRB #- 1240/18) have granted ethical approval to the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN14667607.

摘要

简介

2016 年,格鲁吉亚的研究人员和政策制定者正在制定一项改善国家结核病(TB)控制计划绩效的政策。“为格鲁吉亚结核病护理设计和评估基于提供者的成果融资:了解成本、影响机制和影响(Results4TB)”研究计划的启动旨在为政策制定阶段提供信息,记录政策实施情况,并评估效果、成本效益以及变革过程。为此,研究团队打算在一个总体理论指导的设计中结合影响评估、成本效益研究和现实主义评估(RE)。本方案是该计划的 RE 部分。

方法

将采用现实主义方法学方法来指导研究设计和评估。RE 回答了“在什么条件下对谁有效?”的问题,并从初始方案理论(IPT)的开发开始。IPT 将为现实主义研究周期的其他阶段(研究设计、数据收集、数据分析和综合以及理论完善)提供信息。通过文件审查、深入访谈、非参与观察和设施及国家层面的背景映射,在一个多嵌入式案例研究设计(五个干预和三个对照地点)中收集数据。来自其他研究部分(成本效益和影响评估)的附加数据将有助于数据三角剖分。

伦理与传播

格鲁吉亚国家疾病控制和公共卫生中心(IRB # 2018-019)和安特卫普热带医学研究所(IRB #- 1240/18)的机构审查委员会已批准该研究。

试验注册号

ISRCTN64263126。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60a1/6500265/c6628589153a/bmjopen-2019-030257f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60a1/6500265/cf6deecf5c26/bmjopen-2019-030257f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60a1/6500265/640a8ef2aca7/bmjopen-2019-030257f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60a1/6500265/c6628589153a/bmjopen-2019-030257f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60a1/6500265/cf6deecf5c26/bmjopen-2019-030257f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60a1/6500265/640a8ef2aca7/bmjopen-2019-030257f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60a1/6500265/c6628589153a/bmjopen-2019-030257f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing and evaluating provider results-based financing for tuberculosis care in Georgia: a realist evaluation protocol.设计并评估格鲁吉亚结核病关怀提供者基于成果的融资:一个实际评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 14;9(4):e030257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030257.
2
How do participatory methods shape policy? Applying a realist approach to the formulation of a new tuberculosis policy in Georgia.参与式方法如何影响政策?在格鲁吉亚制定新的结核病政策过程中应用现实主义方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e047948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047948.
3
Addressing challenges in tuberculosis adherence via performance-based payments for integrated case management: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial in Georgia.通过基于绩效的综合病例管理支付来解决结核病治疗依从性方面的挑战:格鲁吉亚一项群组随机对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3621-z.
4
Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study.一项复杂综合护理计划的现实主义评价:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 1;8(3):e017111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111.
5
Strengthening capacity in hospitals to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality through a codesigned intervention package: protocol for a realist evaluation as part of a stepped-wedge trial of the Action Leveraging Evidence to Reduce perinatal morTality and morbidity (ALERT) in sub-Saharan Africa project.通过一套量身定制的干预措施包增强医院能力,以降低围产期发病率和死亡率:作为在撒哈拉以南非洲实施的利用证据降低围产期发病率和死亡率(ALERT)行动杠杆项目的一部分,开展真实评估的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e057414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057414.
6
Capacity building of district health management teams in the era of provincial health administration reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a realist evaluation protocol.刚果民主共和国省级卫生行政改革时代的地区卫生管理团队能力建设:一个现实主义评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 18;13(7):e073508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073508.
7
Outcomes of a community-based antiretroviral therapy programme for key populations living with HIV in Benue State, Nigeria: protocol for a realist evaluation.尼日利亚贝努埃州基于社区的抗逆转录病毒疗法方案对艾滋病毒重点人群的结果:一项实际评估的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 30;12(11):e062941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062941.
8
Understanding the influence of the MomConnect programme on antenatal and postnatal care service utilisation in two South African provinces: a realist evaluation protocol.理解 MomConnect 项目对南非两个省份产前和产后护理服务利用的影响:一个真实评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 1;9(7):e029745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029745.
9
First Things First: How to Elicit the Initial Program Theory for a Realist Evaluation of Complex Integrated Care Programs.首先要做的事:如何引出复杂综合护理项目的实际评估的初始方案理论。
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):151-189. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12543. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
10
Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.青少年重复意外怀孕干预消除计划(INTERUPT):干预效果与成本效益的系统评价,以及实施因素和用户参与的定性与实在论综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(16):1-214. doi: 10.3310/hta20160.

引用本文的文献

1
Capacity building of district health management teams in the era of provincial health administration reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a realist evaluation protocol.刚果民主共和国省级卫生行政改革时代的地区卫生管理团队能力建设:一个现实主义评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 18;13(7):e073508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073508.
2
How do participatory methods shape policy? Applying a realist approach to the formulation of a new tuberculosis policy in Georgia.参与式方法如何影响政策?在格鲁吉亚制定新的结核病政策过程中应用现实主义方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e047948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047948.
3
Applying the Realist Evaluation Approach to the Complex Process of Policy Implementation-The Case of the User Fee Exemption Policy for Cesarean Section in Benin.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the acceptability and adherence to paediatric antiretroviral treatment in the new formulation of pellets (LPV/r): the protocol of a realist evaluation.了解新型颗粒制剂(洛匹那韦/利托那韦)中儿童抗逆转录病毒治疗的可接受性和依从性:一项实效评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e014528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014528.
2
Can "realist" randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?“现实主义”随机对照试验能真正做到现实主义吗?
Trials. 2016 Jul 7;17(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1407-0.
3
Opening the 'black box' of performance-based financing in low- and lower middle-income countries: a review of the literature.
运用现实主义评价方法研究复杂的政策执行过程——以贝宁剖宫产免费政策为例。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;9:553980. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.553980. eCollection 2021.
4
Programme theory and realist evaluation of the 'Smoke-Free Vocational Schools' research and intervention project: a study protocol.“无烟职业学校”研究与干预项目的方案理论与现实主义评价:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 4;11(2):e042728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042728.
打开低收入和中低收入国家基于绩效的融资“黑匣子”:文献综述
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1297-309. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw045. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
4
The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example.在实用随机对照试验中构建和检验中层理论的三个阶段:一个理论与方法的案例
Trials. 2015 Oct 15;16:466. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0980-y.
5
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
6
Realist RCTs of complex interventions - an oxymoron.真实世界对照随机临床试验(RCT)对复杂干预措施而言是一个自相矛盾的概念。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;94:124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
7
The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework.证据、背景和促进因素在实施试验中的作用:对 PARIHS 框架发展的启示。
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 9;8:28. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-28.
8
Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.现实主义随机对照试验:一种评估复杂公共卫生干预措施的新方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5.