Nebot Giralt Ariadna, Nöstlinger Christiana, Lee Janice, Salami Olawale, Lallemant Marc, Ouma Onyango, Nyamongo Isaac, Marchal Bruno
Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e014528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014528.
Improving access to paediatric HIV treatment requires both large-scale treatment programmes and medication that is adapted to infants and children's needs. The WHO recommends lopinavir/ritonavir as first-line antiretroviral therapy for all HIV-infected children younger than 3 years. There is currently little evidence on the acceptability of, and adherence to, a formulation of this combination treatment if given in the form of pellets. This protocol presents how we will carry a realist evaluation to assess the factors that contribute to the acceptability and adherence to the new pellets formulation in 3 hospitals in Kenya.
We structured the protocol along the realist evaluation cycle following 4 steps: (1) the initial programme theory, (2) the study design, (3) the data collection methods and (4) the data analysis plan. Theories of behavioural sciences were reviewed for frames that could provide insights into how using such new formulations may contribute to better acceptability and adherence.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Tropical Medicine, the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Antwerp and the Kenyatta National Hospital/University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee. We aim to disseminate the findings through international conferences and peer-reviewed journals and to share them with Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative's (DNDi) programme managers and with the Kenyan healthcare providers.
In developing this study, we encountered some challenges. First, methods to measure the acceptability of any formulation and adherence to it are not standardised. The second challenge is common in realist evaluation and relates to how to choose from different potentially interesting theoretical frameworks. We identified relevant and empirically tested theories from behavioural science that may be helpful in our study. We will test them in 3 settings by exploring the multilevel factors that influence acceptability and adherence of this new paediatric Antiretroviral (ARV) formulation.
改善儿童艾滋病治疗的可及性既需要大规模治疗项目,也需要适合婴幼儿需求的药物。世界卫生组织推荐洛匹那韦/利托那韦作为所有3岁以下感染艾滋病儿童的一线抗逆转录病毒疗法。目前,关于这种联合治疗制剂以小丸形式给药的可接受性和依从性的证据很少。本方案介绍了我们将如何在肯尼亚的3家医院进行一项实效评价,以评估有助于接受和依从新小丸制剂的因素。
我们按照实效评价周期的4个步骤构建了本方案:(1)初始项目理论,(2)研究设计,(3)数据收集方法,(4)数据分析计划。我们回顾了行为科学理论,以寻找能深入了解使用这种新制剂如何有助于提高可接受性和依从性的框架。
本研究得到了热带医学研究所机构审查委员会、安特卫普大学医院伦理委员会以及肯雅塔国家医院/内罗毕大学伦理与研究委员会的批准。我们旨在通过国际会议和同行评审期刊传播研究结果,并与被忽视疾病药物倡议(DNDi)的项目经理以及肯尼亚医疗服务提供者分享这些结果。
在制定本研究方案时,我们遇到了一些挑战。首先,衡量任何制剂的可接受性及其依从性的方法并不标准化。第二个挑战在实效评价中很常见,涉及如何从不同的潜在有趣理论框架中进行选择。我们从行为科学中确定了相关的、经过实证检验的理论,这些理论可能对我们的研究有所帮助。我们将在3个环境中进行测试,探索影响这种新型儿科抗逆转录病毒(ARV)制剂可接受性和依从性的多层次因素。