• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价:目前的二线幽门螺杆菌治疗中,基于药敏的治疗方案能否实现可接受的治愈率?

Systematic review: Would susceptibility-guided treatment achieve acceptable cure rates for second-line Helicobacter pylori therapy as currently practiced?

机构信息

Internal Medicine Departament, Parc Taulí University Sanitary Corporation, Sabadell, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Helicobacter. 2019 Jun;24(3):e12584. doi: 10.1111/hel.12584. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1111/hel.12584
PMID:30990575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Susceptibility-guided treatment has been proposed as a way to improve Helicobacter pylori eradication rates. Evidence on its efficacy for rescue therapy is very scarce. The aim of this study was to indirectly assess the applicability and effectiveness of susceptibility-guided treatment by evaluating (a) the rate of acceptance of endoscopy, (b) its success in detecting resistances, and (c) infection cure rates in patients harboring strains found to be susceptible to the antibiotics administered in clinical trials in which the efficacy of second-line treatments was reported.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies evaluating second-line H pylori treatment was carried out in multiple databases. Studies reporting antibiotic susceptibility evaluation and/or cure rates in patients harboring sensitive and resistant strains were selected. Data were extracted in duplicate.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 36 eligible studies. Acceptance was evaluated in only one study of 60 patients, of whom only 38 agreed to endoscopy. Among the 2890 patients who received endoscopy and culture, resistances were finally determined in 86.5%. Cure rate was 72.5% in the 113 patients harboring a clarithromycin-susceptible strain after previous clarithromycin treatment, 93.5% in the 765 patients harboring a metronidazole-susceptible strain, and 83.8% in the 192 patients harboring a levofloxacin-susceptible strain. No studies with repeated administration of levofloxacin or metronidazole were found.

CONCLUSION

Even if the culture shows a clarithromycin-sensitive strain, repeating clarithromycin after a first failure should be discouraged. Susceptibility-guided treatment alone did not achieve adequate cure rates for rescue therapies. Additional measures are needed to design rescue treatments that consistently achieve excellent cure rates.

摘要

背景

敏感性指导治疗被提议作为提高幽门螺杆菌根除率的一种方法。关于其在补救治疗中的疗效的证据非常有限。本研究的目的是通过评估(a)接受内镜检查的比例,(b)检测耐药性的成功率,以及(c)在临床试验中报告二线治疗疗效的抗生素治疗中发现敏感菌株的患者的感染治愈率,间接地评估敏感性指导治疗的适用性和有效性。

方法

在多个数据库中进行了评估二线 H pylori 治疗的系统评价。选择了报告抗生素敏感性评估和/或在携带敏感和耐药菌株的患者中治愈率的研究。数据由两人重复提取。

结果

系统评价确定了 36 项合格研究。仅在一项 60 例患者的研究中评估了接受程度,其中只有 38 例同意接受内镜检查。在接受内镜检查和培养的 2890 例患者中,最终确定了 86.5%的耐药性。在 113 例先前接受克拉霉素治疗且克拉霉素敏感的患者中,治愈率为 72.5%,在 765 例甲硝唑敏感的患者中,治愈率为 93.5%,在 192 例左氧氟沙星敏感的患者中,治愈率为 83.8%。未发现重复使用左氧氟沙星或甲硝唑的研究。

结论

即使培养显示克拉霉素敏感菌株,也不应该鼓励在首次失败后重复使用克拉霉素。单独的敏感性指导治疗未能达到补救治疗的充分治愈率。需要采取额外措施来设计始终能达到优异治愈率的补救治疗。

相似文献

1
Systematic review: Would susceptibility-guided treatment achieve acceptable cure rates for second-line Helicobacter pylori therapy as currently practiced?系统评价:目前的二线幽门螺杆菌治疗中,基于药敏的治疗方案能否实现可接受的治愈率?
Helicobacter. 2019 Jun;24(3):e12584. doi: 10.1111/hel.12584. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
Clinical evaluation of a ten-day regimen with esomeprazole, metronidazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a high clarithromycin resistance area.在克拉霉素高耐药地区,采用埃索美拉唑、甲硝唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素十天疗法的临床评估。
Helicobacter. 2013 Dec;18(6):459-67. doi: 10.1111/hel.12062. Epub 2013 May 29.
3
Second-line rescue triple therapy with levofloxacin after failure of non-bismuth quadruple "sequential" or "concomitant" treatment to eradicate H. pylori infection.在非铋剂四联“序贯”或“联合”疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染失败后,采用左氧氟沙星进行二线挽救三联疗法。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;48(6):652-6. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.786132. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
4
Nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy: empirical and tailored efficacy versus standard triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus sequential therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains.非铋四联(联合)疗法:对克拉霉素敏感的幽门螺杆菌的经验性和针对性疗效与标准三联疗法相比,以及对克拉霉素耐药菌株的序贯疗法相比。
Helicobacter. 2012 Aug;17(4):269-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2012.00947.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
5
Levofloxacin or Clarithromycin-based quadruple regimens: what is the best alternative as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in a country with high resistance rates for both antibiotics?基于左氧氟沙星或克拉霉素的四联疗法:在两种抗生素耐药率都很高的国家,作为根除幽门螺杆菌的一线治疗,哪种是最佳替代方案?
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0589-6.
6
Five-year sequential changes in secondary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Taiwan.台湾幽门螺杆菌继发性抗生素耐药性的五年连续变化
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 7;21(37):10669-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10669.
7
Impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the effectiveness of sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: lessons from a 5-year study on a large number of strains.原发性抗生素耐药性对幽门螺杆菌感染序贯疗法疗效的影响:一项针对大量菌株的 5 年研究的经验教训。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;47(9):1261-1269. doi: 10.1111/apt.14597. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection in children: is in vitro susceptibility testing helpful?儿童幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗方案:体外药敏试验有帮助吗?
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 May;40(5):571-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000155567.71902.75.
9
Culture-based selection therapy for patients who did not respond to previous treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection.基于培养的选择疗法用于治疗先前对幽门螺杆菌感染治疗无反应的患者。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;11(5):507-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.007. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
10
Concomitant therapy achieved the best eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori among various treatment strategies.在各种治疗策略中,联合治疗对幽门螺杆菌的根除率最高。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):351-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.351.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Resistant : Diagnosis and Evidence-Based Approach.耐药性:诊断与循证方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;13(18):2944. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182944.
2
Current paradigms in the management of refractory Helicobacter pylori infection.难治性幽门螺杆菌感染的当前管理范式。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;42(6):766-779. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01448-3. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
3
Diagnostic Tests Used in Europe: Results of over 34,000 Patients from the European Registry on Management.欧洲使用的诊断测试:来自欧洲管理登记处的34000多名患者的结果。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 28;12(13):4363. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134363.
4
Susceptibility-guided sequential strategy versus empirical therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.基于药敏的序贯治疗与经验性治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的随机对照研究方案
Trials. 2023 Jun 19;24(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07457-z.
5
Treatment of refractory infection: A new challenge for clinicians.难治性感染的治疗:临床医生面临的新挑战。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 18;13:998240. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.998240. eCollection 2022.
6
Clinical Implications of Antibiotic Resistance in Italy: A Review of the Literature.意大利抗生素耐药性的临床影响:文献综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 21;11(10):1452. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101452.
7
Empirical vs. Susceptibility-Guided Treatment of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经验性治疗与药敏指导下的感染治疗:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 14;13:913436. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.913436. eCollection 2022.
8
Culture-based antibiotic susceptibility testing for infection: a systematic review.基于培养的感染性疾病抗生素敏感性试验:一项系统评价
Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar-Apr;35(2):127-134. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0689. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
9
Empirical or susceptibility-guided treatment for infection? A comprehensive review.感染的经验性治疗还是药敏指导治疗?一项全面综述。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 12;13:1756284820968736. doi: 10.1177/1756284820968736. eCollection 2020.
10
Best Eradication Strategy in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance.抗生素耐药时代的最佳根除策略
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Jul 23;9(8):436. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9080436.