Faber Joseph, Bar-Meir Maskit, Rudensky Bernard, Schlesinger Yechiel, Rachman Elena, Benenson Shmuel, Sirota Gisela, Stankiewic Halina, Halle David, Wilschanski Michael
Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 May;40(5):571-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000155567.71902.75.
Treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori have variable success rates, and data comparing effectiveness with respect to strain sensitivity are relatively scarce.
To evaluate the efficacy of two treatment regimens for eradication of H. pylori and the impact of bacterial susceptibility testing.
265 children endoscopically diagnosed with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to receive omeprazole + amoxicillin with clarithromycin or omeprazole + amoxicillin with metronidazole. Bacterial culture and susceptibility was performed in a subgroup. Eradication was assessed by C-urea breath test.
Eradication was achieved in 73.4% by omeprazole + amoxicillin with metronidazole and in 62.6% by omeprazole + amoxicillin with clarithromycin (P = 0.078). H. pylori was cultured successfully in 105 patients. Resistance to metronidazole was detected in 31.4% of the isolates and resistance to clarithromycin in 15%. Eradication rate by omeprazole + amoxicillin with metronidazole for metronidazole-susceptible bacteria (N = 38) was 90%, and for resistant bacteria (N = 19) it was 42%. Only 75% of clarithromycin-sensitive strains were successfully treated by omeprazole + amoxicillin with clarithromycin, and none of the cases with clarithromycin-resistant strains responded to omeprazole + amoxicillin with clarithromycin treatment.
There is a trend of greater efficacy of eradication with omeprazole + amoxicillin with metronidazole versus omeprazole + amoxicillin with clarithromycin therapy. Although resistance negatively influences eradication, first-line sensitivity-based treatment would be expected to improve this rate only slightly. Susceptibility testing should probably be reserved only for treatment failures.
幽门螺杆菌的治疗方案成功率各不相同,且关于菌株敏感性与有效性对比的数据相对较少。
评估两种根除幽门螺杆菌治疗方案的疗效以及细菌药敏试验的影响。
265名经内镜诊断为幽门螺杆菌感染的儿童被随机分配接受奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素或奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+甲硝唑治疗。对一个亚组进行细菌培养及药敏试验。通过C尿素呼气试验评估根除情况。
奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+甲硝唑治疗的根除率为73.4%,奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素治疗的根除率为62.6%(P = 0.078)。105例患者的幽门螺杆菌培养成功。分离菌株中31.4%检测到对甲硝唑耐药,15%对克拉霉素耐药。奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+甲硝唑治疗甲硝唑敏感菌(N = 38)的根除率为90%,对耐药菌(N = 19)的根除率为42%。奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素仅成功治疗了75%的克拉霉素敏感菌株,且克拉霉素耐药菌株的病例均对奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素治疗无反应。
与奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素治疗相比,奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+甲硝唑根除治疗有疗效更高的趋势。虽然耐药性会对根除产生负面影响,但基于敏感性的一线治疗预计只会略微提高根除率。药敏试验可能仅应保留用于治疗失败的情况。