Bailly Rose Mary, DeFazio Dena M
Albany Law School.
Albany Law Rev. 2017;80(3):1181-225.
The creation of the New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs ("Justice Center") was announced with great fanfare in 2013. Its goal is laudable: strengthening and standardizing "the safety net for vulnerable persons, adults and children alike, who are receiving care from New York's human service agencies and programs." Its jurisdiction is broad: covering residential and non-residential programs and provider agencies that come within the purview of six state oversight agencies, namely, the Office of Mental Health, the Office for People with Developmental Disabilities, the Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services, the Office of Children and Family Services, the Department of Health, and the State Education Department. Its powers are comprehensive: investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, and significant incidents, and disciplining individuals and agencies pursuant to administrative authority. In addition, it can prosecute crimes of neglect and abuse pursuant to criminal prosecutorial authority. Given that over 270,000 vulnerable children and adults live in residential facilities overseen by the state and that numerous other individuals receive services from "day programs operated, licensed[,] or certified by the state[,]" the creation of the Justice Center is consistent with New York's history of oversight of vulnerable individuals. The state has overseen various state and municipal programs and private organizations that have addressed the needs of vulnerable individuals practically since New York's first poorhouse opened in 1736. The development of that oversight has been a series of responses to perceived deficiencies of an existing system, and the creation of the Justice Center is, much in the same way, a response to a 2011 study commissioned by the Governor to examine the treatment and care of vulnerable adults. The Justice Center’s jurisdiction reflects a departure, however, from traditional oversight. State administrative and regulatory review has been carried out by specialized state agencies established during the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries to address specific categories of individuals receiving care and treatment according to their needs. Residential and day treatment programs, as well as their custodians and employees, have been disciplined for abuse and neglect in accordance with state regulations created by these agencies. Criminal prosecutions have also been referred to county district attorneys. The Justice Center unites all specialized agencies, all vulnerable individuals with diverse needs, and all custodians and employees trained to meet those needs under one additional layer of uniform rules and regulations, with potential administrative discipline, civil liability, and criminal prosecution also under the same umbrella. This article explores the history of state oversight in New York and the departure represented by the Justice Center. This article first traces the early history of oversight. It then discusses the role of the Commission on Quality of Care for the Mentally Disabled, an antecedent organization similar to the Justice Center. Next, it examines the Justice Center itself. Last, this article concludes with some reflections on the Center.
纽约州保护特殊需求人群司法中心(“司法中心”)于2013年高调宣布成立。其目标值得称赞:加强并规范“为正在接受纽约州公共服务机构和项目照料的弱势人群(包括成人和儿童)提供的安全保障”。其管辖范围广泛:涵盖居住和非居住项目以及六个州监管机构职权范围内的服务提供机构,这六个机构分别是心理健康办公室、发育障碍人士办公室、酒精和药物滥用服务办公室、儿童和家庭服务办公室、卫生部以及州教育部。其权力全面:调查虐待、忽视及重大事件的指控,并依据行政权力对个人和机构进行惩戒。此外,它还可依据刑事检控权对忽视和虐待犯罪提起诉讼。鉴于超过27万名弱势儿童和成人居住在由该州监管的居住设施中,且众多其他个人从“由该州运营、许可或认证的日间项目”中接受服务,司法中心的设立与纽约州对弱势人群的监管历史是一致的。自1736年纽约首个救济院开办以来,该州实际上一直在监管各种州和市的项目以及满足弱势人群需求的私人组织。这种监管的发展是对现有系统中察觉到的缺陷的一系列回应,而司法中心的设立在很大程度上也是对州长于2011年委托进行的一项关于弱势成年人治疗和照料情况研究的回应。然而,司法中心的管辖范围与传统监管有所不同。州行政和监管审查一直由19世纪末和20世纪设立的专门州机构进行,这些机构根据特定类别的接受照料和治疗的个人的需求开展工作。居住和日间治疗项目以及它们的管理人员和员工,因虐待和忽视行为而依据这些机构制定的州法规受到惩戒。刑事诉讼也会提交给县地方检察官。司法中心将所有专门机构、所有有不同需求的弱势个人以及所有为满足这些需求而接受培训的管理人员和员工统一置于另一层统一的规章制度之下,潜在的行政惩戒、民事责任和刑事诉讼也都在同一框架内。本文探讨纽约州监管的历史以及司法中心所代表的背离。本文首先追溯监管的早期历史。接着讨论精神残疾者护理质量委员会的作用,该委员会是一个与司法中心类似的前身组织。然后,审视司法中心本身。最后,本文对该中心进行一些思考后得出结论。