Mirza Arshad, Singh Nirvikar
Center for Analytical Finance, 421 E2 Building, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA,
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2019 Mar 1;22(1):25-37.
This paper frames the state of mental health policy in India in terms of seven sets of questions, and seeks to provide at least partial answers to these questions, based on a meta-analysis of existing research. The context of the analysis is the arguably poor state of mental health care in India, as well as an unprecedented level of policy attention to the issue.
In brief, the questions we pose pertain to (i) the provision of such care in hospitals, (ii) non-hospital provision, including by non-medical providers, (iii) issues of education and social acceptance, (iv) affordability, (v) within-country variation of care and possibilities for benchmarking, (vi) aggregate resource impacts of a concerted effort to change policies and improve care, and (vii) the shape of a more effective "continuum of care" for mental health issues.
Given the complexity of the subject, this paper is meant to serve as a framing of issues for further research, but in doing so, to clarify what issues are most pressing, those that are most difficult and perhaps those that can be tackled more readily, to create some momentum in changing the relatively poor state of mental health care in India.
While new laws and policies being introduced in India propose ideas and changes that are groundbreaking for that country, leading to cautious optimism, there still are many gaps in the understanding of the challenges of the provision of increased access to, as well as better quality, mental health care in India. These challenges can be understood on two fronts: one is the psychiatric and medical aspect of the issues, and the other is the management and administration of the system.
Perhaps the highest priority in achieving the goals of greater access and better quality is to increase the number of trained personnel at all levels of specialization and skilling that are relevant. Further, while the new legal framework and policy identify the importance of information technology in rapid expansion of access to mental healthcare, more context-specific research and trials are needed. With respect to the administration and management needs of the public system, important challenges will be the need for significant organizational innovations in the education system, and cultural changes that allow specialized medical professionals to accept the use of software and less-qualified, more dispersed, frontline providers. A final area is the interface between the public and private sectors, including the role of non-profit organizations: challenges include information sharing, division of responsibilities, and resource allocation.
Our analysis suggests that incorporating information technology, along with training professionals at a variety of skill levels in its use, may provide a resource-feasible approach to improving access to mental healthcare at reasonable cost and quality in the Indian context.
India's mental health policies are already undergoing major changes, and our analysis emphasizes the need for translating these generic policies into specific and implementable versions that can be tested at the local level across different regional and social contexts in India.
The overall challenge is daunting, being the need to expand access and improve quality, while still managing costs, all within an overall healthcare system that is itself struggling to achieve these goals. Further research based on piloting and trials of assistive software and training programs will likely be useful.
本文从七组问题的角度阐述了印度心理健康政策的现状,并试图基于对现有研究的荟萃分析,为这些问题提供至少部分答案。分析的背景是印度心理健康护理状况可能不佳,以及对该问题前所未有的政策关注。
简而言之,我们提出的问题涉及:(i)医院提供此类护理的情况;(ii)非医院提供护理的情况,包括非医疗提供者提供的护理;(iii)教育和社会接受度问题;(iv)可负担性;(v)国内护理的差异以及进行基准对比的可能性;(vi)共同努力改变政策和改善护理对资源的总体影响;(vii)针对心理健康问题的更有效“连续护理”模式。
鉴于该主题的复杂性,本文旨在为进一步研究梳理问题,但在此过程中,明确哪些问题最为紧迫、哪些最困难以及哪些或许更容易解决,以推动改变印度相对较差的心理健康护理状况。
虽然印度出台的新法律和政策提出了对该国具有开创性的理念和变革,引发了谨慎的乐观情绪,但在理解增加心理健康护理可及性以及提高护理质量所面临的挑战方面,仍存在许多差距。这些挑战可从两个方面来理解:一方面是问题的精神病学和医学层面,另一方面是系统的管理和行政层面。
在实现更大可及性和更高质量目标方面,或许最优先的事项是增加各级相关专业技能培训人员的数量。此外,虽然新的法律框架和政策认识到信息技术在快速扩大心理健康护理可及性方面的重要性,但仍需要更多针对具体情况的研究和试验。关于公共系统的管理和行政需求,重要挑战将是教育系统需要进行重大组织创新,以及文化变革,使专业医疗人员能够接受使用软件以及资质较低、分布更分散的一线提供者。最后一个领域是公共部门与私营部门之间的接口,包括非营利组织的作用:挑战包括信息共享、责任划分和资源分配。
我们的分析表明,在印度背景下,将信息技术与培训不同技能水平的专业人员使用信息技术相结合,可能提供一种资源可行的方法,以合理的成本和质量改善心理健康护理的可及性。
印度的心理健康政策已经在经历重大变革,我们的分析强调需要将这些一般性政策转化为具体的、可实施的版本,以便在印度不同地区和社会背景下的地方层面进行测试。
总体挑战艰巨,需要在扩大可及性、提高质量的同时控制成本,而这一切都要在本身也在努力实现这些目标的整体医疗保健系统内进行。基于辅助软件和培训项目的试点和试验开展进一步研究可能会有所帮助。