• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭用氧:1982年至1986年亨特地区供应的合理化

Domiciliary oxygen: rationalization of supply in the Hunter region from 1982-1986.

作者信息

McKeon J L, Saunders N A, Murree-Allen K

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1987 Jan 19;146(2):73-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb136266.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb136266.x
PMID:3099142
Abstract

In October 1982, a clinic was planned at The Royal Newcastle Hospital to review the usage of domiciliary oxygen that was funded by the Provision of Aids for Disabled Persons scheme in the Hunter Region of New South Wales. Patient review included an assessment of the indications for domiciliary oxygen, education in the use of oxygen, the efficiency of delivery arrangements and the transfer from cylinders to concentrators as indicated. Between January and June 1983, 111 patients who were receiving oxygen at home were reviewed: 84 (76%) of these patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; their two-year survival was 80% (95% confidence interval, 69%-87%) and five-year survival was 36% (95% confidence interval, 25%-46%). In 66 (59%) patients, review led to a reduction in the usage of domiciliary oxygen which was estimated to save $40,000 each year in the Hunter Region. In the year from 1985-1986 the decrease in the usage of oxygen at home represented an actual cost saving of $60,000 for the region ($470 per person) which translated into a saving of $95,000 ($740 per person) when inflation was taken into account. If our experience is projected nation-wide, the potential exists for a considerable cost saving by means of programmes to rationalize the use of domiciliary oxygen.

摘要

1982年10月,皇家纽卡斯尔医院计划开设一家诊所,以审查由新南威尔士州猎人地区残疾人援助计划资助的家庭用氧使用情况。患者评估包括对家庭用氧适应症的评估、氧气使用教育、输送安排的效率以及根据指示从气瓶向制氧机的转换。1983年1月至6月期间,对111名在家接受氧气治疗的患者进行了评估:其中84名(76%)患者患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病;他们的两年生存率为80%(95%置信区间,69%-87%),五年生存率为36%(95%置信区间,25%-46%)。在66名(59%)患者中,评估导致家庭用氧使用量减少,据估计,这在猎人地区每年可节省4万美元。在1985年至1986年的一年里,该地区家庭用氧使用量的减少实际节省了6万美元(每人470美元),考虑到通货膨胀后,这相当于节省了9.5万美元(每人740美元)。如果将我们的经验推广到全国,通过合理使用家庭用氧的计划,有可能节省大量成本。

相似文献

1
Domiciliary oxygen: rationalization of supply in the Hunter region from 1982-1986.家庭用氧:1982年至1986年亨特地区供应的合理化
Med J Aust. 1987 Jan 19;146(2):73-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb136266.x.
2
Domiciliary oxygen: the cost-benefit dilemma.家庭氧疗:成本效益困境。
Med J Aust. 1987 Jan 19;146(2):62-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb136262.x.
3
An evaluation of the use of concentrators for domiciliary oxygen supply for less than 8 h day-1.对每天使用制氧机进行家庭供氧不足8小时的情况进行评估。
Respir Med. 1998 Feb;92(2):250-5. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90104-4.
4
Domiciliary oxygen cylinders: indications, prescription and usage.家用氧气瓶:适应症、处方及用法。
Respir Med. 1994 Nov;88(10):777-85. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(05)80201-x.
5
Long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy.长期家庭氧疗
Lancet. 1985 Aug 17;2(8451):365-7.
6
Long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy--the Johannesburg Hospital experience.长期家庭氧疗——约翰内斯堡医院的经验
S Afr Med J. 2000 Jun;90(6):617-21.
7
The continuing impact of home oxygen therapy for respiratory patients on a hospital budget.家庭氧疗对呼吸疾病患者的持续影响及对医院预算的作用
Aust Health Rev. 1992;15(3):259-68.
8
Long-term home oxygen therapy in children and adolescents: analysis of clinical use and costs of a home care program.儿童和青少年长期家庭氧疗:家庭护理计划的临床应用和成本分析。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2011 Jan-Feb;87(1):13-8. doi: 10.2223/JPED.2050. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
9
Initial trends in quality of life and survival in CAL patients on domiciliary oxygen therapy.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1996 Feb;51(1):64-71.
10
Domiciliary oxygen.家庭用氧
Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Apr-May;50(3):151-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prescription of oxygen concentrators for long term oxygen treatment.长期氧疗用制氧机的处方
BMJ. 1988 Dec 3;297(6661):1468-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6661.1468-c.