• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏报告对耐甲氧西林敏感血流感染治疗的影响。

Impact of Reported β-Lactam Allergy on Management of Methicillin-Sensitive Bloodstream Infections.

机构信息

2971Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2020 Dec;33(6):809-814. doi: 10.1177/0897190019841737. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1177/0897190019841737
PMID:30991876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antistaphylococcal β-lactams antibiotics are the preferred treatment for methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) infections. Patient-reported β-lactam allergies may complicate antibiotic decision-making and delay optimal therapy, with potential implications on patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of reported β-lactam allergies on the receipt of optimal therapy and outcomes for MSSA bloodstream infections (BSI).

METHODS

Retrospective, matched cohort of MSSA BSI patients with and without a reported β-lactam allergy. The primary end point was receipt of optimal therapy, defined as an antistaphylococcal β-lactam.

RESULTS

Two hundred twelve patients were included: 53 with reported β-lactam allergy and 159 without β-lactam allergy. Commonly reported β-lactam allergies were 26 (49%) immune-mediated reaction and 8 (15%) intolerance, with 19 (36%) having no documented reaction. Optimal antibiotics were given to 135 patients without a β-lactam allergy and 37 patients with a reported β-lactam allergy (85% vs 70%, .015). Among reported β-lactam allergy patients, those without a documented reaction were less likely to receive optimal therapy (47% vs 79 .042). Reported β-lactam allergy was not associated with clinical response ( .61) or MSSA-related mortality ( .83). When adjusting for immunosuppression, variables independently associated with optimal therapy were β-lactam allergy (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.6) and infectious diseases consultation (adjOR, 6.1; 95%CI, 2.7-13.9). Optimal antibiotic use was associated with decreased all-cause 90-day mortality (adjOR, 0.23; 95%CI, 0.09-0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with reported β-lactam allergies, particularly those without a documented reaction, were less likely to receive optimal antibiotics for MSSA BSI. Patient outcomes may be improved with enhanced quality of allergy history and routine infectious disease consultation.

摘要

背景

抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类抗生素是治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)感染的首选药物。患者自述的β-内酰胺类过敏可能会使抗生素决策复杂化,并延迟最佳治疗,从而对患者的预后产生潜在影响。

目的

确定报告的β-内酰胺类过敏对 MSSA 血流感染(BSI)患者接受最佳治疗和结局的影响。

方法

回顾性匹配 MSSA BSI 患者的队列,其中包括有报告β-内酰胺类过敏的患者和无β-内酰胺类过敏的患者。主要终点是接受最佳治疗,定义为使用抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物。

结果

共纳入 212 例患者:53 例报告β-内酰胺类过敏,159 例无β-内酰胺类过敏。常见的报告β-内酰胺类过敏包括 26 例(49%)免疫介导的反应和 8 例(15%)不耐受,其中 19 例(36%)无记录的反应。135 例无β-内酰胺类过敏的患者和 37 例报告β-内酰胺类过敏的患者接受了最佳抗生素治疗(85% vs 70%,.015)。在报告β-内酰胺类过敏的患者中,无记录反应的患者接受最佳治疗的可能性较低(47% vs 79%.042)。报告的β-内酰胺类过敏与临床反应无关(.61)或 MSSA 相关死亡率无关(.83)。当调整免疫抑制状态时,与最佳治疗相关的独立变量包括β-内酰胺类过敏(调整后的优势比[adjOR],0.3;95%置信区间[CI],0.1-0.6)和感染病咨询(adjOR,6.1;95%CI,2.7-13.9)。最佳抗生素使用与降低 MSSA BSI 患者 90 天全因死亡率相关(adjOR,0.23;95%CI,0.09-0.54)。

结论

报告有β-内酰胺类过敏的患者,特别是无记录反应的患者,更不可能接受 MSSA BSI 的最佳抗生素治疗。通过提高过敏史的质量和常规感染病咨询,可能改善患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Impact of Reported β-Lactam Allergy on Management of Methicillin-Sensitive Bloodstream Infections.β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏报告对耐甲氧西林敏感血流感染治疗的影响。
J Pharm Pract. 2020 Dec;33(6):809-814. doi: 10.1177/0897190019841737. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
The Impact of Reporting a Prior Penicillin Allergy on the Treatment of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.报告既往青霉素过敏对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症治疗的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0159406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159406. eCollection 2016.
3
Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals.β-内酰胺类药物与万古霉素治疗 122 家医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的疗效比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 1;61(3):361-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ308. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Daptomycin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams in Definitive Treatment of Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.达托霉素与抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物在治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染中的临床结局比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Aug;58(2):106363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106363. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes for Glycopeptides and Beta-Lactams in Methicillin-Susceptible Bloodstream Infections.糖肽类药物与β-内酰胺类药物治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的临床结局比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jul;63(7):611-618. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.611.
6
β-Lactam Therapy for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Comparative Review of Cefazolin versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins.β-内酰胺类药物治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症:头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素的比较综述
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Mar;37(3):346-360. doi: 10.1002/phar.1892. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Daptomycin Plus β-Lactam Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study.达托霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染:一项回顾性、对比队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 24;71(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz746.
8
Administration of a β-Lactam Prior to Vancomycin as the First Dose of Antibiotic Therapy Improves Survival in Patients With Bloodstream Infections.β-内酰胺类抗生素在万古霉素之前给药作为抗生素治疗的首剂可改善血流感染患者的生存。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):98-104. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab865.
9
Impact of Beta-lactam Allergy on Treatment of Outpatient Infections.β-内酰胺类过敏对门诊感染治疗的影响。
Clin Ther. 2019 Dec;41(12):2529-2539. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Bloodstream Infections: A Noninferiority Retrospective Cohort Study.头孢曲松治疗耐甲氧西林敏感血流感染的安全性和疗效:一项非劣效性回顾性队列研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2023 Apr;57(4):425-431. doi: 10.1177/10600280221115460. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics of antibiotic allergy.抗生素过敏的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 14;50(1):39-44. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108648.
2
Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and β-Lactam Cross-Reactivity.头孢菌素:聚焦于侧链与β-内酰胺交叉反应性
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jul 29;7(3):103. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030103.