Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jul;63(7):611-618. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.611.
This study aimed to provide compelling evidence of anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam use for methicillin-susceptible bloodstream infection (MSSA BSI).
We retrospectively collected data on patients with MSSA BSI who were admitted to two academic tertiary-care hospitals from 2010 to 2018. Only patients who received nafcillin, cefazolin, vancomycin, or teicoplanin as definitive therapy were included. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. To perform unbiased comparisons between both treatments, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis.
A total of 359 patients were divided into two groups based on the definitive therapy used: beta-lactams (n=203), including nafcillin or cefazolin; and glycopeptides (n=156), including vancomycin or teicoplanin. In the IPTW analysis, glycopeptides were associated with significantly increased odds of 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 3.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.71-6.61; <0.001). The rate of primary outcome in prespecified subgroups was largely consistent with the main analysis.
Definitive therapy with beta-lactams in patients with MSSA BSI was associated with lower 28-day mortality compared to definitive therapy with glycopeptides.
本研究旨在为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)血流感染(BSI)的抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物治疗提供有力证据。
我们回顾性收集了 2010 年至 2018 年期间在两家学术性三级保健医院住院的 MSSA BSI 患者的数据。仅纳入接受苯唑西林、头孢唑林、万古霉素或替考拉宁作为确定性治疗的患者。主要结局是 28 天死亡率。为了在两种治疗方法之间进行无偏倚比较,我们使用了逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)分析。
根据使用的确定性治疗方法,359 名患者分为两组:β-内酰胺类(n=203),包括苯唑西林或头孢唑林;糖肽类(n=156),包括万古霉素或替考拉宁。在 IPTW 分析中,糖肽类与 28 天死亡率显著增加相关(调整后的优势比,3.37;95%置信区间,1.71-6.61;<0.001)。预设亚组的主要结局发生率与主要分析基本一致。
与糖肽类作为确定性治疗相比,MSSA BSI 患者使用β-内酰胺类药物作为确定性治疗与较低的 28 天死亡率相关。