Suppr超能文献

广谱血管加压素类药物:脓毒性休克初始治疗的新方法?

Broad spectrum vasopressors: a new approach to the initial management of septic shock?

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA.

La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2019 Apr 16;23(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2420-y.

Abstract

The mainstay of hemodynamic treatment of septic shock is fluid resuscitation followed by vasopressors where fluids alone are insufficient to achieve target blood pressure. Norepinephrine, a catecholamine, is the first-line vasopressor used worldwide but given that all routinely used catecholamines target the same adrenergic receptors, many clinicians may add a non-catecholamine vasopressor where refractory hypotension due to septic shock is present. However, the timing of this additional intervention is variable. This decision is based on three key factors: availability, familiarity, and safety profile. In our opinion, further consideration should be potential vasopressor response because following appropriate volume resuscitation, the response to different vasopressor classes is neither uniform nor predictable. Critically ill patients who are non-responders to high-dose catecholamines have a dismal outcome. Similarly, patients have a variable response to non-catecholamine agents including vasopressin and angiotensin II: but where patients exhibit a blood pressure response the outcomes are improved over non-responders. This variable responsiveness to vasopressors is similar to the clinical approach of anti-microbial sensitivity. In this commentary, the authors propose the concept of "broad spectrum vasopressors" wherein patients with septic shock are started on multiple vasopressors with a different mechanism of action simultaneously while the vasopressor sensitivity is assessed. Once the vasopressor sensitivities are assessed, then the vasopressors are 'de-escalated' accordingly. We believe that this concept may offer a new approach to the treatment of septic shock.

摘要

感染性休克血流动力学治疗的主要手段是液体复苏,然后是血管加压药,如果单独使用液体不足以达到目标血压,则使用血管加压药。去甲肾上腺素是一种儿茶酚胺,是全球范围内使用的一线血管加压药,但由于所有常规使用的儿茶酚胺都作用于相同的肾上腺素能受体,许多临床医生可能会在存在感染性休克难治性低血压的情况下添加非儿茶酚胺血管加压药。然而,这种额外干预的时机是可变的。这一决定基于三个关键因素:可用性、熟悉程度和安全性。在我们看来,还应进一步考虑潜在的血管加压反应,因为在适当的容量复苏后,不同血管加压药类别的反应既不是一致的,也不是可预测的。对高剂量儿茶酚胺无反应的危重症患者预后不良。同样,患者对非儿茶酚胺药物(包括血管加压素和血管紧张素 II)的反应也存在差异:但在患者出现血压反应的情况下,其预后优于无反应者。这种对血管加压药的反应性差异类似于抗微生物敏感性的临床方法。在这篇评论中,作者提出了“广谱血管加压药”的概念,即同时使用具有不同作用机制的多种血管加压药开始治疗感染性休克患者,同时评估血管加压反应性。一旦评估了血管加压反应性,就可以相应地“降级”血管加压药。我们相信,这一概念可能为感染性休克的治疗提供一种新方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/6469125/371e043072c2/13054_2019_2420_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验