Scheeren Thomas W L, Bakker Jan, De Backer Daniel, Annane Djillali, Asfar Pierre, Boerma E Christiaan, Cecconi Maurizio, Dubin Arnaldo, Dünser Martin W, Duranteau Jacques, Gordon Anthony C, Hamzaoui Olfa, Hernández Glenn, Leone Marc, Levy Bruno, Martin Claude, Mebazaa Alexandre, Monnet Xavier, Morelli Andrea, Payen Didier, Pearse Rupert, Pinsky Michael R, Radermacher Peter, Reuter Daniel, Saugel Bernd, Sakr Yasser, Singer Mervyn, Squara Pierre, Vieillard-Baron Antoine, Vignon Philippe, Vistisen Simon T, van der Horst Iwan C C, Vincent Jean-Louis, Teboul Jean-Louis
Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
New York University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0498-7.
Vasopressors are commonly applied to restore and maintain blood pressure in patients with sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the current practice and therapeutic goals regarding vasopressor use in septic shock as a basis for future studies and to provide some recommendations on their use.
From November 2016 to April 2017, an anonymous web-based survey on the use of vasoactive drugs was accessible to members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). A total of 17 questions focused on the profile of respondents, triggering factors, first choice agent, dosing, timing, targets, additional treatments, and effects of vasopressors. We investigated whether the answers complied with current guidelines. In addition, a group of 34 international ESICM experts was asked to formulate recommendations for the use of vasopressors based on 6 questions with sub-questions (total 14).
A total of 839 physicians from 82 countries (65% main specialty/activity intensive care) responded. The main trigger for vasopressor use was an insufficient mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to initial fluid resuscitation (83%). The first-line vasopressor was norepinephrine (97%), targeting predominantly a MAP > 60-65 mmHg (70%), with higher targets in patients with chronic arterial hypertension (79%). The experts agreed on 10 recommendations, 9 of which were based on unanimous or strong (≥ 80%) agreement. They recommended not to delay vasopressor treatment until fluid resuscitation is completed but rather to start with norepinephrine early to achieve a target MAP of ≥ 65 mmHg.
Reported vasopressor use in septic shock is compliant with contemporary guidelines. Future studies should focus on individualized treatment targets including earlier use of vasopressors.
血管升压药常用于脓毒症患者以恢复和维持血压。我们旨在评估目前脓毒性休克患者使用血管升压药的实际情况和治疗目标,为未来研究提供依据,并就其使用提出一些建议。
2016年11月至2017年4月,欧洲重症医学学会(ESICM)成员可参与一项关于血管活性药物使用的匿名网络调查。总共17个问题聚焦于受访者的个人资料、触发因素、首选药物、剂量、给药时间、目标、额外治疗以及血管升压药的效果。我们调查了这些答案是否符合当前指南。此外,还邀请了34位ESICM国际专家根据6个问题及子问题(共14个)制定血管升压药使用的建议。
来自82个国家的839名医生(65%的主要专业/活动为重症监护)做出了回应。使用血管升压药的主要触发因素是初始液体复苏后平均动脉压(MAP)反应不足(83%)。一线血管升压药是去甲肾上腺素(97%),主要目标是MAP>60 - 65 mmHg(70%),慢性动脉高血压患者的目标更高(79%)。专家们就10条建议达成一致,其中9条基于一致或强烈(≥80%)同意。他们建议不要等到液体复苏完成后再延迟使用血管升压药治疗,而应尽早开始使用去甲肾上腺素,以达到≥65 mmHg的目标MAP。
报告的脓毒性休克中血管升压药的使用符合当代指南。未来的研究应侧重于个体化治疗目标,包括更早使用血管升压药。