Suppr超能文献

免疫调节性、基于抗体的肿瘤治疗药物的免疫原性。

Immunogenicity of immunomodulatory, antibody-based, oncology therapeutics.

机构信息

Pfizer, San Diego, CA, USA.

University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;7(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0586-0.

Abstract

The increasing use of multiple immunomodulatory (IMD) agents for cancer therapies (e.g. antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]-T cells), is raising questions on their potential immunogenicity and effects on treatment. In this review, we outline the mechanisms of action (MOA) of approved, antibody-based IMD agents, potentially related to their immunogenicity, and discuss the reported incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) as well as their clinical relevance in patients with cancer. In addition, we discuss the impact of the administration route and potential strategies to reduce the incidence of ADA and manage treated patients. Analysis of published reports indicated that the risk of immunogenicity did not appear to correlate with the MOA of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 monoclonal antibodies nor to substantially affect treatment with most of these agents in the majority of patients evaluated to date. Treatment with B-cell depleting agents appears associated with a low risk of immunogenicity. No significant difference in ADA incidence was found between the intravenous and subcutaneous administration routes for a panel of non-oncology IMD antibodies. Additionally, while the data suggest a higher likelihood of immunogenicity for antibodies with T-cell or antigen-presenting cell (APC) targets versus B-cell targets, it is possible to have targets expressed on APCs or T cells and still have a low incidence of immunogenicity.

摘要

多种免疫调节(IMD)药物(例如针对免疫检查点的抗体、双特异性抗体和嵌合抗原受体 [CAR]-T 细胞)越来越多地用于癌症治疗,这引发了对其潜在免疫原性和对治疗影响的疑问。在这篇综述中,我们概述了已批准的基于抗体的 IMD 药物的作用机制(MOA),这些机制可能与其免疫原性有关,并讨论了报告的抗药物抗体(ADA)的发生率及其在癌症患者中的临床相关性。此外,我们还讨论了给药途径的影响以及潜在的策略,以降低 ADA 的发生率并管理接受治疗的患者。对已发表报告的分析表明,免疫原性风险似乎与抗程序性死亡 1(PD-1)/PD-配体 1 单克隆抗体的 MOA 无关,也不会实质性影响迄今为止评估的大多数患者中这些药物的大多数治疗效果。B 细胞耗竭剂的治疗似乎与免疫原性风险低相关。在一组非肿瘤学 IMD 抗体中,静脉内和皮下给药途径的 ADA 发生率没有显著差异。此外,虽然数据表明,针对 T 细胞或抗原呈递细胞(APC)靶点的抗体比针对 B 细胞靶点的抗体更有可能具有免疫原性,但仍有可能针对 APC 或 T 细胞表达的靶点,并且 ADA 的发生率仍然很低。

相似文献

3
Preface: More than two decades of modern tumor immunology.前言:二十多年的现代肿瘤免疫学
Methods Enzymol. 2019;629:xxi-xl. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(19)30459-8.
4
[Toxicity of immune checkpoints inhibitors].[免疫检查点抑制剂的毒性]
Rev Mal Respir. 2018 Dec;35(10):1028-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2017.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
T cell checkpoint regulators in the heart.心脏中的 T 细胞检查点调节剂。
Cardiovasc Res. 2019 Apr 15;115(5):869-877. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz025.
10

引用本文的文献

6
Recent advances in phototherapy-based nanomedicine of lymphoma.基于光疗法的淋巴瘤纳米医学的最新进展。
Mater Today Bio. 2025 Jul 3;33:102047. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102047. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Marstacimab for the Treatment of Hemophilia A or B.玛斯塔西单抗用于治疗甲型或乙型血友病。
Biologics. 2025 Jun 24;19:379-386. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S500480. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

4
Fundamental Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy.免疫检查点阻断治疗的基本机制。
Cancer Discov. 2018 Sep;8(9):1069-1086. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0367. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
The promise and challenges of immune agonist antibody development in cancer.免疫激动剂抗体在癌症中的前景与挑战。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018 Jul;17(7):509-527. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.75. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验