Suppr超能文献

与传统计算机断层扫描相比,锥形束计算机断层扫描在诊断下胫腓联合损伤中的准确性。

Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for syndesmosis injury diagnosis compared to conventional computed tomography.

作者信息

Hamard Marion, Neroladaki Angeliki, Bagetakos Ilias, Dubois-Ferrière Victor, Montet Xavier, Boudabbous Sana

机构信息

Division of Radiology, Department of Imaging and Medical Informatics, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.

Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Apr;26(3):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Syndesmosis injury can lead to ankle mortise instability and early osteoarthritis. Several multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) methods for measurement have been developed. Weight-bearing cone beam CT (WB CBCT) is an emerging technique that offers the possibility of upright-position scanning and lower doses. This study sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of WB CBCT in syndesmose injury compared to MDCT, with instability confirmed via manual testing upon arthroscopic examination.

METHODS

Three musculoskeletal radiologists with different levels of expertise prospectively analyzed 11 MDCT and eight WB CBCT scans of the same trauma-afflicted ankles with clinical suspicion of syndesmosis lesion over a period of 5 months. They evaluated 10 methods of measurement in both sides. Syndesmosis was considered pathological on arthroscopic examination in four patients. Correlation between readers was evaluated with intra-class correlation testing (p < 0.05 was considered significant). Capacity of discrimination was assessed by area under the curve (AUC) for all methods.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement was near excellent for both WB CBCT and MDCT for the anterior tibio-fibular (TF) distance (ICC = 0.781 and 0.831, respectively), posterior TF distance (ICC = 0.841 and 0.826), minimal TF distance (ICC = 0.899 and 0.875), and TF surface (ICC = 0.93 and 0.84). AUC were better for MDCT than WB CBCT in assessing syndesmosis instability for: anterior TF distance (ROC = 0.869 vs. 0.555, p = 0.01), minimal TF distance (ROC = 0.883 vs. 0.608, p = 0.02) and antero-posterior fibular translation (ROC = 0.894 vs. 0.467, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT demonstrated better ability to distinguish pathological syndesmosis than WB CBCT, with the antero-posterior fibular translation the best discriminating measurement. The physiological widening of the contralateral syndesmosis occurring with the WB CBCT upright position may explain these results.

摘要

背景

下胫腓联合损伤可导致踝关节 mortise 不稳定和早期骨关节炎。已经开发了几种用于测量的多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)方法。负重锥形束 CT(WB CBCT)是一种新兴技术,它提供了直立位扫描和低剂量的可能性。本研究旨在评估 WB CBCT 在下胫腓联合损伤中的诊断准确性,并与 MDCT 进行比较,通过关节镜检查时的手动测试确认不稳定情况。

方法

三位具有不同专业水平的肌肉骨骼放射科医生前瞻性地分析了 11 例 MDCT 和 8 例 WB CBCT 扫描,这些扫描来自同一组在 5 个月内临床怀疑有下胫腓联合损伤的创伤性踝关节。他们评估了两侧的 10 种测量方法。4 例患者在关节镜检查中被认为下胫腓联合有病变。通过组内相关检验评估读者之间的相关性(p < 0.05 被认为具有显著性)。通过所有方法的曲线下面积(AUC)评估辨别能力。

结果

对于胫腓前(TF)距离(ICC 分别为 0.781 和 0.831)、胫腓后距离(ICC 为 0.841 和 0.826)、最小 TF 距离(ICC 为 0.899 和 0.875)以及 TF 表面(ICC 为 0.93 和 0.84),WB CBCT 和 MDCT 的观察者间一致性均接近优秀。在评估下胫腓联合不稳定方面,MDCT 的 AUC 比 WB CBCT 更好:对于胫腓前距离(ROC = 0.869 对 0.555,p = 0.01)、最小 TF 距离(ROC = 0.883 对 0.608,p = 0.02)以及腓骨前后移位(ROC = 0.894 对 0.467,p = 0.006)。

结论

MDCT 在下胫腓联合病变的辨别能力上优于 WB CBCT,其中腓骨前后移位是最佳的辨别测量指标。WB CBCT 直立位时对侧下胫腓联合的生理性增宽可能解释了这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验