Ricci G, Campanozzi L L, Marinelli S, Midolo E, Ruggeri L
School of Law, University of Camerino.
Institute of Philosophy of Scientific and Technological Practice (FAST), Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome.
Clin Ter. 2019 Mar-Apr;170(2):e102-e107. doi: 10.7417/CT.2019.2118.
This paper aims to examine the legal status of the human embryo taking into consideration Article 1 of the Italian law on medically assisted procreation, which protects the human embryo, which is recognised as an individual holding the same rights as already born children. The progressive increase in legal decisions regarding reproductive technologies requires a re-examination of the traditional legal categories of "subjectivity" and legal capacity, and a deeper understanding of the status of the human embryo as a subject, or individua.
The following sources were searched: Institutional websites, Research Centre for Social Investments reports, updated jurisprudence and Rulings of Italian Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights. In addition, also the following databases were searched: PubMed and Scopus, using the following keywords: medically assisted procreation (MAP) and embryo.
The authors believe that the best orientation is the modern principle of equality (non-discrimination); according to them, the need to protect unborn life requires therefore the consideration of interests which can no longer be confined to the solely patrimonial ones held by the embryo. The paper draws attention to a series of non-patrimonial interests, for whose protection the legal expert has to adopt innovative safeguarding techniques. In this context, there emerge some rights worthy of protection whose potential holders are as yet unborn.
本文旨在结合意大利医学辅助生殖法第1条来审视人类胚胎的法律地位。该条法律保护人类胚胎,胚胎被视为享有与已出生儿童相同权利的个体。关于生殖技术的法律裁决日益增多,这就需要重新审视“主体性”和法律行为能力等传统法律范畴,并更深入地理解人类胚胎作为主体或个体的地位。
检索了以下来源:机构网站、社会投资研究中心报告、最新判例法以及意大利宪法法院和欧洲人权法院的裁决。此外,还检索了以下数据库:PubMed和Scopus,使用了以下关键词:医学辅助生殖(MAP)和胚胎。
作者认为,最佳导向是现代平等原则(非歧视);据此,他们认为保护未出生生命的必要性要求考虑那些不再能仅限于胚胎所拥有的纯粹财产利益的利益。本文提请注意一系列非财产利益,为保护这些利益,法律专家必须采用创新的保障技术。在这种背景下,出现了一些值得保护的权利,其潜在主体尚未出生。