Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, South Korea.
Thorac Cancer. 2019 May;10(5):1229-1240. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13073. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is rare and its clinical features, appropriate treatment, and prognosis are poorly understood. Reports conflict over the prognosis of C-SCLCs compared to pure small cell lung cancer.
The records of patients diagnosed with primary SCLC from 1988 to 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The general features of C-SCLCs were compared to those of SCLCs. T1-2 N0-1 data was extracted and the effects of the histological subtype, treatment modality, and other prognostic factors on lung cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed in a 3:1 matched dataset. Analysis was performed using the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system and previous staging systems adjunctively.
C-SCLCs comprised 1.5% of all SCLCs (1486/98 667); 184 cases of C-SCLCs and 2681 cases of non-combined SCLCs (NC-SCLCs) were included in this study. C-SCLCs were more likely to be of a higher grade and to occur in the upper lobe than NC-SCLCs. Before matching, C-SCLCs showed better CSS (hazard ratio 0.69; P < 0.001). However, stratified Cox proportional hazards analysis in the matched dataset revealed that only treatment modality and age at diagnosis were associated with CSS; the histological subtype had no effect on survival. Of all treatment modalities, surgery with chemoradiation showed the best CSS in T1-2 N0-1 SCLC.
In early SCLC, surgery with chemoradiation shows the best CSS. C-SCLC patients might benefit more from multimodal treatments, including surgery, than SCLC patients.
小细胞肺癌合并(C-SCLC)较为罕见,其临床特征、治疗方法和预后尚不清楚。与单纯小细胞肺癌(SCLC)相比,C-SCLC 的预后报告存在差异。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中提取了 1988 年至 2014 年诊断为原发性 SCLC 的患者记录。比较了 C-SCLC 与 SCLC 的一般特征。提取 T1-2N0-1 数据,并在 3:1 匹配数据集上分析组织学亚型、治疗方式和其他预后因素对肺癌特异性生存(CSS)的影响。分析采用第 8 版肿瘤淋巴结转移分期系统和之前的分期系统。
C-SCLC 占所有 SCLC 的 1.5%(1486/98667);本研究纳入了 184 例 C-SCLC 和 2681 例非合并 SCLC(NC-SCLC)。与 NC-SCLC 相比,C-SCLC 更有可能分级更高,且发生在上叶。在匹配前,C-SCLC 的 CSS 更好(风险比 0.69;P<0.001)。然而,匹配数据集的分层 Cox 比例风险分析显示,只有治疗方式和诊断时的年龄与 CSS 相关;组织学亚型对生存无影响。在所有治疗方式中,手术联合放化疗在 T1-2N0-1SCLC 中显示出最佳的 CSS。
在早期 SCLC 中,手术联合放化疗显示出最佳的 CSS。与 SCLC 患者相比,C-SCLC 患者可能从包括手术在内的多种治疗方式中获益更多。