Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
Centre for Psychology, London, UK.
Psychol Psychother. 2020 Sep;93(3):456-473. doi: 10.1111/papt.12233. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) proposes that cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance are inter-related processes underpinning distress. This study investigated whether worry, rumination, and stressful life events on the one hand and anxiety and depression on the other hand were mediated by cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance (bidirectional serial association).
A questionnaire design was conducted cross-sectionally in a clinical sample (study 1; N = 57) and cross-sectionally and longitudinally in a non-clinical student sample (study 2; N = 106 and N = 97 respectively).
Participants completed measures of worry, rumination, stressful life events (predictors), cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance (mediators), anxiety, and depression (outcomes) at T1. In study 2, anxiety and depression were measured again 6 weeks later.
In the clinical sample, the bidirectional relationship between experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion accounted for a significant proportion of the association between rumination and depression, and stressful life events and anxiety and depression. The association between worry and anxiety was mediated by cognitive fusion → experiential avoidance only. In the non-clinical sample, in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, cognitive fusion independently mediated the association between predictors and outcomes, as well as the experiential avoidance → cognitive fusion pathway.
The bidirectional association between cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance was most predictive of distress in the clinical sample. In the non-clinical sample, cognitive fusion and the experiential avoidance → cognitive fusion pathway demonstrated more explanatory value. Given the cross-sectional nature of most of the data, the findings provide theoretical (as opposed to empirical) support for the models tested.
Interventions designed to reduce cognitive fusion may be a useful early intervention for sub-clinical anxiety and depression. Interventions focused on reducing both cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance may be helpful for individuals presenting with clinical anxiety and depression. Individuals presenting with particularly high levels of experiential avoidance may benefit from initial work defusing from difficult thoughts, as an inroad for reducing experiential avoidance, anxiety, and depression. Likewise, those with rigid cognitive fusion may benefit from initial work around acceptance skills to create a context that better supports defusion.
接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)提出,认知融合和经验回避是相互关联的过程,是痛苦的基础。本研究调查了一方面是担忧、反刍和生活压力事件,另一方面是焦虑和抑郁,它们是否通过认知融合和经验回避(双向串联关联)来介导。
在一个临床样本中进行了问卷调查设计(研究 1;N=57),并在一个非临床学生样本中进行了横断面和纵向研究(研究 2;分别为 N=106 和 N=97)。
参与者在 T1 时完成了担忧、反刍、生活压力事件(预测因素)、认知融合、经验回避(中介因素)、焦虑和抑郁(结果)的测量。在研究 2 中,6 周后再次测量了焦虑和抑郁。
在临床样本中,经验回避和认知融合的双向关系解释了反刍与抑郁以及生活压力事件与焦虑和抑郁之间的关联的很大一部分。担忧与焦虑之间的关联仅通过认知融合→经验回避来介导。在非临床样本中,在横断面和纵向分析中,认知融合独立地介导了预测因素与结果之间的关联,以及经验回避→认知融合的途径。
在临床样本中,认知融合和经验回避的双向关联最能预测痛苦。在非临床样本中,认知融合和经验回避→认知融合的途径具有更大的解释价值。鉴于大多数数据的横断面性质,这些发现为所测试的模型提供了理论(而不是经验)支持。
旨在降低认知融合的干预措施可能是亚临床焦虑和抑郁的早期有效干预措施。针对认知融合和经验回避都降低的干预措施可能对有临床焦虑和抑郁的人有帮助。表现出特别高的经验回避水平的个体可能会从最初的从困难的想法中解脱出来的工作中受益,这是减少经验回避、焦虑和抑郁的切入点。同样,那些认知融合僵化的人可能会从最初的接受技能工作中受益,以创造一个更能支持解脱的环境。