Roye Benjamin D, Campbell Megan L, Matsumoto Hiroko, Pahys Joshua M, Welborn Michelle Cameron, Sawyer Jeffrey, Fletcher Nicholas D, McIntosh Amy L, Sturm Peter F, Gomez Jaime A, Roye David P, Lenke Lawrence G, Vitale Michael G
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York.
Shriner's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Jan;40(1):e42-e48. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001379.
Although halo gravity traction (HGT) has been used to treat children with severe spinal deformity for decades, there is a distinct lack of high-quality evidence to speak to its merits or to dictate ideal manner of implementation. In addition, no guidelines exist to drive research or assist surgeons in their practice. The aim of this study was to establish best practice guidelines (BPG) using formal techniques of consensus building among a group of experienced pediatric spinal deformity surgeons to determine ideal indications and implementation of HGT for pediatric spinal deformity.
The Delphi process and nominal group technique were used to formally derive consensus among leaders in pediatric spine surgery. Initial work identified significant areas of variability in practice for which we sought to garner consensus. After review of the literature, 3 iterative surveys were administered from February through April 2018 to nationwide experts in pediatric spinal deformity. Surveys assessed anonymous opinions on ideal practices for indications, preoperative evaluation, protocols, and complications, with agreement of 80% or higher considered consensus. Final determination of consensus items and equipoise were established using the Nominal group technique in a facilitated meeting.
Of the 42 surgeons invited, responses were received from 32, 40, and 31 surgeons for each survey, respectively. The final meeting included 14 experts with an average 10.5 years in practice and average 88 annual spinal deformity cases. Experts reached consensus on 67 items [indications (17), goals (1), preoperative evaluations (5), protocols (36), complications (8)]; these were consolidated to create final BPG in all categories, including statements to help dictate practice such as using at least 6 to 8 pins under 4 to 8 lbs of torque, with a small, tolerable starting weight and reaching goal weight of 50% TBW in ∼2 weeks. Nine items remained items of equipoise for the purposes of guiding future research.
We developed consensus-based BPG for the use and implementation of HGT for pediatric spinal deformity. This can serve as a measure to help drive future research as well as give new surgeons a place to begin their practice of HGT.
Level V-expert opinion.
尽管头环重力牵引(HGT)已用于治疗儿童严重脊柱畸形数十年,但明显缺乏高质量证据来证明其优点或规定理想的实施方式。此外,没有指导方针来推动研究或协助外科医生开展实践。本研究的目的是通过一组经验丰富的小儿脊柱畸形外科医生采用正式的共识建立技术,制定最佳实践指南(BPG),以确定小儿脊柱畸形HGT的理想适应症和实施方法。
采用德尔菲法和名义群体技术在小儿脊柱外科领域的领导者中正式达成共识。初步工作确定了实践中存在显著差异的重要领域,我们试图在这些领域达成共识。在文献回顾之后,于2018年2月至4月对全国小儿脊柱畸形专家进行了3轮迭代调查。调查评估了关于适应症、术前评估、方案和并发症的理想实践的匿名意见,80%或更高的一致性被视为达成共识。在一次促进会议上使用名义群体技术确定了共识项目和平衡的最终结果。
在受邀的42位外科医生中,每次调查分别收到32位、40位和31位外科医生的回复。最终会议包括14位专家,他们平均从业10.5年,平均每年处理88例脊柱畸形病例。专家们就67项内容达成了共识[适应症(17项)、目标(1项)、术前评估(5项)、方案(36项)、并发症(8项)];这些内容被整合以创建所有类别的最终BPG,包括有助于指导实践的陈述,例如在4至8磅扭矩下使用至少6至8根针,起始重量小且可耐受,在约2周内达到目标体重为总体重的50%。为了指导未来的研究,有9项内容仍为平衡项目。
我们制定了基于共识的小儿脊柱畸形HGT使用和实施的BPG。这可以作为一种措施来推动未来的研究,并为新的外科医生提供开展HGT实践的起点。
V级——专家意见。