1Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
2Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Apr 2;27(6):649-660. doi: 10.3171/2020.10.PEDS20778. Print 2021 Jun 1.
Cervical traction in pediatric patients is an uncommon but invaluable technique in the management of cervical trauma and deformity. Despite its utility, little empirical evidence exists to guide its implementation, with most practitioners employing custom or modified adult protocols. Expert-based best practices may improve the care of children undergoing cervical traction. In this study, the authors aimed to build consensus and establish best practices for the use of pediatric cervical traction in order to enhance its utilization, safety, and efficacy.
A modified Delphi method was employed to try to identify areas of consensus regarding the utilization and implementation of pediatric cervical spine traction. A literature review of pediatric cervical traction was distributed electronically along with a survey of current practices to a group of 20 board-certified pediatric neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons with expertise in the pediatric cervical spine. Sixty statements were then formulated and distributed to the group. The results of the second survey were discussed during an in-person meeting leading to further consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree).
After the initial round, consensus was achieved with 40 statements regarding the following topics: goals, indications, and contraindications of traction (12), pretraction imaging (6), practical application and initiation of various traction techniques (8), protocols in trauma and deformity patients (8), and management of traction-related complications (6). Following the second round, an additional 9 statements reached consensus related to goals/indications/contraindications of traction (4), related to initiation of traction (4), and related to complication management (1). All participants were willing to incorporate the consensus statements into their practice.
In an attempt to improve and standardize the use of cervical traction in pediatric patients, the authors have identified 49 best-practice recommendations, which were generated by reaching consensus among a multidisciplinary group of pediatric spine experts using a modified Delphi technique. Further study is required to determine if implementation of these practices can lead to reduced complications and improved outcomes for children.
儿童颈椎牵引是一种在处理颈椎创伤和畸形方面不常见但非常有价值的技术。尽管它很有用,但几乎没有经验证据可以指导其实施,大多数从业者使用定制或修改后的成人方案。基于专家的最佳实践可能会改善接受颈椎牵引的儿童的护理。在这项研究中,作者旨在达成共识并建立儿童颈椎牵引使用的最佳实践,以提高其使用、安全性和疗效。
采用改良 Delphi 法,试图就儿童颈椎牵引的使用和实施达成共识。电子分发了一项关于儿童颈椎牵引的文献综述,并对 20 名具有小儿颈椎专业知识的经过委员会认证的小儿神经外科医生和骨科医生进行了当前实践的调查。然后制定了 60 项陈述并分发给该组。第二轮调查的结果在一次面对面会议上进行了讨论,从而进一步达成共识。共识定义为在 4 分李克特量表上达成≥80%的一致(强烈同意、同意、不同意、强烈不同意)。
在第一轮之后,就以下主题达成了 40 项共识陈述:牵引的目标、适应证和禁忌证(12)、牵引前影像学检查(6)、各种牵引技术的实际应用和启动(8)、创伤和畸形患者的方案(8)和牵引相关并发症的管理(6)。在第二轮之后,又有 9 项与牵引的目标/适应证/禁忌证(4)、与牵引启动(4)和与并发症管理(1)相关的陈述达成共识。所有参与者都愿意将共识陈述纳入他们的实践。
为了改进和规范小儿患者颈椎牵引的使用,作者使用改良 Delphi 技术,通过多学科小儿脊柱专家小组达成共识,确定了 49 条最佳实践建议。需要进一步的研究来确定实施这些实践是否可以降低儿童并发症发生率并改善其结局。