Comparative Analysis between Transferred and Self-Referred STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown the benefits of rapid reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. However, there are still delays during transport of patients to primary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether there is a difference in total ischemic time between patients transferred from other hospitals compared to self-referred patients in our institution.

METHODS

Historical cohort study including patients with acute myocardial infarction treated between April 2014 and September 2015. Patients were divided into transferred patients (group A) and self-referred patients (group B). Clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from our electronic database and the transfer time was estimated based on the time the e-mail requesting patient's transference was received by the emergency department.

RESULTS

The sample included 621 patients, 215 in group A and 406 in group B. Population characteristics were similar in both groups. Time from symptom onset to arrival at the emergency department was significantly longer in group A (385 minutes vs. 307 minutes for group B, p < 0.001) with a transfer delay of 147 minutes. There was a significant relationship between the travel distance and increased transport time (R = 0.55, p < 0.001). However, no difference in mortality was found between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients transferred from other cities for treatment of infarction, transfer time was longer than that recommended, especially in longer travel distances.