Suppr超能文献

奥莫化石的牙齿测量评估:对南方古猿非洲种系统发育位置的影响。

Dental metric assessment of the omo fossils: implications for the phylogenetic position of Australopithecus africanus.

作者信息

Hunt K, Vitzthum V J

出版信息

Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986 Oct;71(2):141-55. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330710203.

Abstract

The discovery of Australopithecus afarensis has led to new interpretations of hominid phylogeny, some of which reject A. africanus as an ancestor of Homo. Analysis of buccolingual tooth crown dimensions in australopithecines and Homo species by Johanson and White (Science 202:321-330, 1979) revealed that the South African gracile australopithecines are intermediate in size between Laetoli/hadar hominids and South African robust hominids. Homo, on the other hand, displays dimensions similar to those of A. afarensis and smaller than those of other australopithecines. These authors conclude, therefore, that A. africanus is derived in the direction of A. robustus and is not an ancestor of the Homo clade. However, there is a considerable time gap (ca. 800,000 years) between the Laetoli/Hadar specimens and the earliest Homo specimens; "gracile" hominids from Omo fit into this chronological gap and are from the same geographic area. Because the early specimens at Omo have been designated A. afarensis and the later specimens classified as Homo habilis, Omo offers a unique opportunity to test hypotheses concerning hominid evolution, especially regarding the phylogenetic status of A. africanus. Comparisons of mean cheek teeth breadths disclosed the significant (P less than or equal to 0.05) differences between the Omo sample and the Laetoli/Hadar fossils (P4, M2, and M3), the Homo fossils (P3, P4, M1, M2, and M1), and A. africanus (M3). Of the several possible interpretations of these data, it appears that the high degree of similarity between the Omo sample and the South African gracile australopithecine material warrants considering the two as geographical variants of A. africanus. The geographic, chronologic, and metric attributes of the Omo sample argue for its lineal affinity with A. afarensis and Homo. In conclusion, a consideration of hominid postcanine dental metrics provides no basis for removing A. africanus from the ancestry of the Homo lineage.

摘要

阿法南方古猿的发现引发了对人科系统发育的新解释,其中一些解释拒绝将非洲南方古猿视为人属的祖先。约翰森和怀特(《科学》202:321 - 330, 1979)对南方古猿和人属物种的颊舌径牙冠尺寸进行分析后发现,南非纤细型南方古猿在大小上介于莱托利/哈达尔人科动物和南非粗壮型南方古猿之间。另一方面,人属显示出与阿法南方古猿相似的尺寸,且小于其他南方古猿的尺寸。因此,这些作者得出结论,非洲南方古猿是朝着粗壮南方古猿的方向演化而来,并非人属分支的祖先。然而,莱托利/哈达尔标本与最早的人属标本之间存在相当长的时间间隔(约80万年);来自奥莫的“纤细型”人科动物正好处于这个时间间隔内,且来自同一地理区域。由于奥莫早期的标本被指定为阿法南方古猿,后期的标本被归类为能人,奥莫提供了一个独特的机会来检验关于人科动物进化的假说,特别是关于非洲南方古猿的系统发育地位。对平均颊齿宽度的比较揭示了奥莫样本与莱托利/哈达尔化石(P4、M2和M3)、人属化石(P3、P4、M1、M2和M1)以及非洲南方古猿(M3)之间存在显著差异(P小于或等于0.05)。在对这些数据的几种可能解释中,奥莫样本与南非纤细型南方古猿材料之间的高度相似性似乎表明应将二者视为非洲南方古猿的地理变种。奥莫样本的地理、时间和度量属性表明它与阿法南方古猿和人属存在直系亲缘关系。总之,对人科犬齿后牙度量的考量并未为将非洲南方古猿从人属谱系的祖先中排除提供依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验