Suwa G, White T D, Howell F C
Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996 Oct;101(2):247-82. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199610)101:2<247::AID-AJPA9>3.0.CO;2-Z.
Over 200 hominid specimens were recovered by the International Omo Expedition of 1967-1976. Despite the fragmentary nature of this primarily dental collection, these hominid remains represent a major body of evidence about hominid evolution in eastern Africa during the 2-3 myr time period. Our analysis of the Omo dental collection is based on a large comparative sample of 375 quantifiable mandibular postcanine teeth of A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. aethiopicus, A. boisei, A. robustus, and early Homo. A total of 48 isolated mandibular premolars and molars of the Omo collection spanning the 2-3 myr time period is sufficiently preserved to allow reliable serial allocations and intertaxon comparisons and is the object of study in this paper. We present taxonomic identifications of these teeth and seven other mandibular specimens preserving tooth crowns. Metric analyses of this study include cusp area and crown shape variables taken on occlusal view diagrams. Nonmetric analyses were based on simultaneous observations of all relevant material to ensure accuracy of categorical evaluations. First, a combined metric and morphological evaluation was conducted to allocate each Omo tooth to either robust or nonrobust categories. Further taxonomic affinities were then examined. Our results indicate that nonrobust and robust lineages cooccur by circa 2.7 myr. We consider the Shungura robust specimens from Members C through F to represent A. aethiopicus. A significant phenetic transformation occurs at circa 2.3 myr, with the mosaic emergence of the derived A. boisei morphology across Member G times. Characterization of the East African nonrobust lineage is more difficult because of the comparatively subtle morphological differences seen among the dentitions of A. afarensis, A. africanus, and early Homo. The earlier Members B and C nonrobust specimens are difficult to evaluate and are considered indeterminate to genus or species. Both molars and premolars from Members E through G exhibit phenetic similarities to the early Homo condition and are considered as aff. Homo sp. indet. At present, there is no indication of multiple species in the Omo nonrobust sample at any time horizon. The 2-2.4 myr Omo nonrobust specimens exhibit some similarities to the stated Homo "rudolfensis" condition in size and morphology and are likely to represent the ancestral condition of the genus Homo. The bearing of these results on interpretations of early hominid evolution and diversification is considered.
1967 - 1976年的国际奥莫考察队发掘出了200多件原始人类标本。尽管这批主要以牙齿为主的标本具有碎片化的特点,但这些原始人类遗骸代表了200万至300万年前东非原始人类进化的重要证据。我们对奥莫牙齿标本的分析基于一个大型比较样本,该样本包含375颗可量化的南方古猿阿法种、南方古猿非洲种、南方古猿埃塞俄比亚种、鲍氏傍人、粗壮傍人和早期智人的下颌犬齿后牙齿。奥莫标本中共有48颗跨越200万至300万年前时间段的孤立下颌前磨牙和磨牙保存得足够完好,能够进行可靠的序列归类和类群间比较,本文将对其进行研究。我们给出了这些牙齿以及另外七件保留牙冠的下颌标本的分类鉴定。本研究的计量分析包括在咬合面视图上获取的牙尖面积和牙冠形状变量。非计量分析基于对所有相关材料的同步观察,以确保分类评估的准确性。首先,进行了综合的计量和形态学评估,将每颗奥莫牙齿归入粗壮或非粗壮类别。然后进一步研究其分类亲缘关系。我们的结果表明,非粗壮和粗壮谱系在约270万年前同时出现。我们认为来自C至F层位的舒古拉粗壮标本代表埃塞俄比亚傍人。在约230万年前发生了显著的表型转变,在G层位时期出现了衍生的鲍氏傍人形态的镶嵌式出现。由于在南方古猿阿法种、南方古猿非洲种和早期智人的齿列中观察到的形态差异相对细微,对东非非粗壮谱系的特征描述更为困难。较早的B层位和C层位的非粗壮标本难以评估,被认为无法确定属或种。E至G层位的磨牙和前磨牙在表型上与早期智人的情况相似,被认为属于人属未定种。目前,在奥莫非粗壮样本中没有任何时期存在多个物种的迹象。200万至240万年前的奥莫非粗壮标本在大小和形态上与所谓的鲁道夫人情况有一些相似之处,很可能代表了人属的祖先状态。本文考虑了这些结果对早期原始人类进化和多样化解释的影响。