Suppr超能文献

原发性主动脉瓣与二尖瓣感染性心内膜炎:全国注册研究。

Native aortic versus mitral valve infective endocarditis: a nationwide registry study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department for Clinical Sciences Lund, Skane University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2019 Feb 27;6(1):e000926. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000926. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Native aortic and mitral valve infective endocarditis (AVE and MVE, respectively) are usually grouped together as left-sided native valve infective endocarditis (LNVE), while the differences between AVE and MVE have not yet been properly investigated. We aimed to compare AVE and MVE in regard to patient characteristics, microbiology and determinants of survival.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the Swedish national registry on infective endocarditis, which contains nationwide patient data. The study period was 2007‒2017, and included cases were patients who had either AVE or MVE.

RESULTS

We included 649 AVE and 744 MVE episodes. was more often the causative pathogen in MVE (41% vs 31%, p<0.001), whereas enterococci were more often the causative pathogen in AVE (14% vs 7.4%, p<0.001). Perivalvular involvement occurred more frequently in AVE (8.5% vs 3.5%, p<0.001) and brain emboli more frequently in MVE (21% vs 13%, p<0.001). Surgery for IE was performed more often (35% vs 27%, p<0.001) and sooner after diagnosis (6.5 days vs 9 days, p=0.012) in AVE than in MVE. Several risk predictors differed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The microbiology seems to differ between AVE and MVE. The causative pathogen was not associated with mortality in AVE. The between-group differences regarding clinical presentation and predictors of survival indicate that it may be important to differentiate AVE from MVE in the treatment of LNVE.

摘要

背景

原发性主动脉瓣和二尖瓣感染性心内膜炎(分别为 AVE 和 MVE)通常被归类为左心原发性瓣膜感染性心内膜炎(LNVE),而 AVE 和 MVE 之间的差异尚未得到充分研究。我们旨在比较 AVE 和 MVE 在患者特征、微生物学和生存决定因素方面的差异。

方法

我们使用包含全国性患者数据的瑞典全国感染性心内膜炎登记处进行了一项回顾性研究。研究期间为 2007 年至 2017 年,纳入的病例为患有 AVE 或 MVE 的患者。

结果

我们纳入了 649 例 AVE 和 744 例 MVE 发作。与 AVE 相比,MVE 中更常见的病原体为 (41%比 31%,p<0.001),而肠球菌在 AVE 中更常见(14%比 7.4%,p<0.001)。瓣周受累在 AVE 中更常见(8.5%比 3.5%,p<0.001),而在 MVE 中脑栓塞更常见(21%比 13%,p<0.001)。IE 手术在 AVE 中进行的频率更高(35%比 27%,p<0.001),且在诊断后更早进行(6.5 天比 9 天,p=0.012)。两组之间存在多种风险预测因素的差异。

结论

AVE 和 MVE 的微生物学似乎有所不同。在 AVE 中,病原体与死亡率无关。临床表现和生存预测因素之间的组间差异表明,在 LNVE 的治疗中,区分 AVE 和 MVE 可能很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e53/6443117/0f4da4818cf6/openhrt-2018-000926f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验