Clinical outcome and echocardiographic findings of native and prosthetic valve endocarditis in the 1990's.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis is considered to be associated with a more severe prognosis than native valve endocarditis. Among other factors, inappropriate visualization of vegetations in prosthetic valve endocarditis by transthoracic echocardiography is responsible for this observation. Since the introduction of transoesophageal echocardiography into clinical practice the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the detection of vegetations located on prosthetic valves have been enhanced. Therefore we aimed to determine and compare the prognosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis and native valve endocarditis in the era of this improved diagnostic approach. One hundred and six episodes of infective endocarditis in 104 patients were seen at our institution between 1989 and 1993. Eighty patients (77%) had native valve endocarditis and 24 (23%) had late prosthetic valve endocarditis. In the latter group two patients had recurrent infective endocarditis. Patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis were older (mean age 64 vs 54 years in native valve endocarditis; P < 0.001) and the majority was female (62% vs 38% in native valve endocarditis; P < 0.05). In prosthetic valve endocarditis, infection of a valve in the mitral position predominated (65% vs 30% in native valve endocarditis; P < 0.01), whereas in native valve endocarditis more than half the cases had isolated aortic valve endocarditis (51% vs 27% in prosthetic valve endocarditis; P < 0.01). In prosthetic valve endocarditis more cases were caused by Staphylococcus aureus (31% vs 14% in native valve endocarditis; P = 0.08), whereas in native valve endocarditis the most frequent organisms were streptococci (29% vs 19% in prosthetic valve endocarditis; P = 0.12). Differences in the clinical features of native valve endocarditis and prosthetic valve endocarditis could not be found except for a higher rate of embolism in native valve endocarditis (40% vs 19% in prosthetic valve endocarditis; P < 0.05). Vegetations could be detected by transthoracic echocardiography more frequently in native valve endocarditis (71% vs 15% in prosthetic valve endocarditis; P < 0.0001). Transoesophageal echocardiography visualized vegetations in 95% of the episodes of native valve endocarditis and in 80% of the episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis (P = 0.09). Thus, the diagnostic gain by transoesophageal echocardiography was greatest in prosthetic valve endocarditis. Patients with native valve endocarditis had significantly larger vegetations than patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis (P < 0.05 for length, P < 0.001 for width). The median time to diagnosis was similar in native valve endocarditis and prosthetic valve endocarditis (31 vs 28 days). Surgery was performed in 74% of patients with native valve endocarditis and in 58% of those with prosthetic valve endocarditis; the median time delay between the diagnosis of infective endocarditis and surgery tended to be shorter in prosthetic valve endocarditis than in native valve endocarditis (45 vs 60 days). The in-hospital mortality and the mortality during a follow-up of 22 +/- 10 months did not significantly differ between native valve endocarditis and prosthetic valve endocarditis (21% vs 17%; 28% vs 25%). In summary in the era of transoesophageal echocardiography, late prosthetic valve endocarditis does not seem to carry a worse prognosis than native valve endocarditis. This can be attributed in part to the improved diagnostic accuracy achieved by transoesophageal echocardiography leading to comparable diagnostic latency periods in both patient groups. Finally, better characterization of vegetations on prosthetic valves by transoesophageal echocardiography allows early lifesaving surgery in patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis.