• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收 Fantom 支架的机械性能和愈合模式:FANTOM II 研究的光学相干断层扫描 6 个月和 9 个月随访。

Mechanical performance and healing patterns of the novel sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable Fantom scaffold: 6-month and 9-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography in the FANTOM II study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2019 Feb 28;6(1):e000941. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000941. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2018-000941
PMID:30997130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6443130/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties and healing patterns 6 and 9 months after implantation of the sirolimus-eluting Fantom bioresorbable scaffold (BRS).

BACKGROUND

The Fantom BRS (Reva Medical, San Diego, USA) has differentiating properties including radiopacity, strut thickness of 125 µm, high expansion capacity and has demonstrated favourable mid-term clinical and angiographic outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

FANTOM II was a prospective, single arm study with implantation of the Fantom BRS in 240 patients with stable angina pectoris. Guidance by optical coherence tomography (OCT) was encouraged and was repeated at 6-month (cohort A) or 9-month follow-up (cohort B). Matched baseline and follow-up OCT recordings were available in 152 patients. In-scaffold mean lumen area in cohort A was 6.8±1.7 mm and 5.7±1.4 mm at baseline and follow-up (p<0.0001) and was 7.2±1.6 mm and 5.6±1.4 mm in cohort B (p<0.0001). Mean scaffold area remained stable from 7.1±1.5 mm at baseline to 7.2±1.4 mm at 6 months (p=0.12), and from 7.4±1.5 mm to 7.3±1.4 mm at 9 months. Strut malapposition was median 0.8 (IQR 0.0;3.5)% and 1.8 (IQR 0.3;6.0)% at baseline and was 0.0 (IQR 0.0;0.0)% in both groups at 6-month and 9-month follow-up. Strut tissue coverage was 98.1 (IQR 95.9;99.4)% at 6 months and 98.9 (IQR 98.3;100.0)% at 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel Fantom BRS had favourable healing patterns at 6-month and 9-month follow-up as malapposition was effectively resolved and strut coverage was almost complete. The scaffold remained stable through follow-up with no signs of systematic late recoil.

摘要

目的

评估雷帕霉素洗脱 Fantom 生物可吸收支架(BRS)植入后 6 个月和 9 个月的机械性能和愈合模式。

背景

Fantom BRS(Reva Medical,美国圣地亚哥)具有独特的性能,包括可透光性、125µm 的支架厚度、高扩张能力,并显示出有利的中期临床和血管造影结果。

方法和结果

Fantom II 是一项前瞻性、单臂研究,在 240 例稳定性心绞痛患者中植入 Fantom BRS。鼓励光学相干断层扫描(OCT)指导,并在 6 个月(队列 A)或 9 个月(队列 B)随访时重复进行。在 152 例患者中获得了匹配的基线和随访 OCT 记录。在队列 A 中,支架内平均管腔面积在基线和随访时分别为 6.8±1.7mm 和 5.7±1.4mm(p<0.0001),在队列 B 中分别为 7.2±1.6mm 和 5.6±1.4mm(p<0.0001)。从基线的 7.1±1.5mm 到 6 个月时的 7.2±1.4mm(p=0.12)和从 7.4±1.5mm 到 9 个月时的 7.3±1.4mm,支架面积保持稳定。支架贴壁不良中位数为 0.8(IQR 0.0;3.5)%和 1.8(IQR 0.3;6.0)%,在 6 个月和 9 个月随访时,两组均为 0.0(IQR 0.0;0.0)%。支架组织覆盖率在 6 个月时为 98.1(IQR 95.9;99.4)%,在 9 个月时为 98.9(IQR 98.3;100.0)%。

结论

新型 Fantom BRS 在 6 个月和 9 个月随访时具有良好的愈合模式,因为贴壁不良得到有效解决,支架覆盖率几乎达到 100%。支架在随访过程中保持稳定,没有出现系统性晚期回缩的迹象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6443130/9851952b403f/openhrt-2018-000941f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6443130/78fda472e188/openhrt-2018-000941f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6443130/7aec913bb892/openhrt-2018-000941f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6443130/9851952b403f/openhrt-2018-000941f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6443130/78fda472e188/openhrt-2018-000941f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6443130/7aec913bb892/openhrt-2018-000941f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1def/6443130/9851952b403f/openhrt-2018-000941f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical performance and healing patterns of the novel sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable Fantom scaffold: 6-month and 9-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography in the FANTOM II study.新型西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收 Fantom 支架的机械性能和愈合模式:FANTOM II 研究的光学相干断层扫描 6 个月和 9 个月随访。
Open Heart. 2019 Feb 28;6(1):e000941. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000941. eCollection 2019.
2
Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging.随机比较 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架和 Mirage 微纤维西罗莫司洗脱支架的多模式影像学研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 12;10(11):1115-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
Long-term serial functional evaluation after implantation of the Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold.植入 Fantom 依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收冠状动脉支架后的长期系列功能评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):431-436. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28804. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
4
6-Month Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of a Novel Radiopaque Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The FANTOM II Study.新型放射显影西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架 6 个月的临床和血管造影结果:FANTOM II 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1832-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.033.
5
Intravascular ultrasound findings of the Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold at six- and nine-month follow-up: the FANTOM II study.Fantom 依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架在 6 个月和 9 个月随访时的血管内超声表现:FANTOM II 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Dec 7;14(11):e1215-e1223. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00491.
6
Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes With a Novel Radiopaque Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold.新型不透射线西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架的临床和血管造影结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007283. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007283. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.支架厚度对急性机械性能的影响:DESolve 150 和 DESolve 100 的光学相干断层扫描对比研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.087. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.随机对照试验比较新一代雷帕霉素洗脱生物可吸收支架和金属依维莫司洗脱支架
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 12;11(3):260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.037.
9
In vitro mechanical behavior and in vivo healing response of a novel thin-strut ultrahigh molecular weight poly-l-lactic acid sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold in normal swine.新型超薄高强聚左旋乳酸西罗莫司洗脱可吸收冠状动脉支架在正常猪体内的体外力学性能和体内愈合反应。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;286:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
A 12-month angiographic and optical coherence tomography follow-up after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者植入生物可吸收血管支架后12个月的血管造影和光学相干断层扫描随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;86(4):E180-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26006. Epub 2015 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term safety and effectiveness of the Fantom bioresorbable coronary artery scaffold: final results of the FANTOM II trial.Fantom生物可吸收冠状动脉支架的长期安全性和有效性:FANTOM II试验的最终结果。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Apr 1;20(7):e453-e456. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00504.
2
Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery stenosis: Rationale, design and methodology of the OPTIMIS study.冠状动脉狭窄患者植入Magmaris生物可吸收支架前的最佳病变准备:OPTIMIS研究的原理、设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 7;38:101260. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101260. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
6-Month Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of a Novel Radiopaque Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The FANTOM II Study.新型放射显影西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架 6 个月的临床和血管造影结果:FANTOM II 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1832-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.033.
2
Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial.对比依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗冠状动脉狭窄的疗效(ABSORB II):3 年随机、对照、单盲、多中心临床试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2479-2491. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32050-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
3
Third-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Tyrocore Scaffold Implantation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Baseline and 6-Month OCT and Clinical Outcomes-a FANTOM STEMI Pilot Study.
第三代西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收雷帕霉素靶向洗脱冠脉雷帕霉素洗脱钴基合金支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:基线和 6 个月的 OCT 和临床结局——FANTOM STEMI 初步研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Aug;38(4):719-729. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07429-0. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
4
Bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in the treatment of simple coronary bifurcation lesions: The BIFSORB pilot II study.生物可吸收镁支架治疗单纯冠状动脉分叉病变:BIFSORB Ⅱ期研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):1075-1083. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30051. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
5
Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions.生物可吸收支架:现状与未来方向
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Nov 30;7:589571. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.589571. eCollection 2020.
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold radial expansion and conformation compared to a metallic platform: insights from in vitro expansion in a coronary artery lesion model.与金属平台相比,生物可吸收血管支架的径向扩张和形态:来自冠状动脉病变模型体外扩张的见解。
EuroIntervention. 2016 Sep 18;12(7):834-44. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I7A138.
4
Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架植入术后的两年临床、血管造影及光学相干断层扫描连续随访:来自日本随机ABSORB试验的见解
EuroIntervention. 2016 Oct 20;12(9):1090-1101. doi: 10.4244/EIJY16M09_01.
5
Randomised comparison of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold with a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: the 2-year clinical outcomes of the ABSORB II trial.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架与金属依维莫司洗脱支架治疗初发原位冠状动脉病变所致缺血性心脏病的随机对照研究:ABSORB II试验的2年临床结果
EuroIntervention. 2016 Oct 20;12(9):1102-1107. doi: 10.4244/EIJY16M08_01.
6
Prevalence of parameters of suboptimal scaffold deployment following angiographic guided bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in real world practice - an optical coherence tomography analysis.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.096. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
Vasomotor Function Comparative Assessment at 1 and 2 Years Following Implantation of the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and the Xience V Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent in Porcine Coronary Arteries: Insights From In Vivo Angiography, Ex Vivo Assessment, and Gene Analysis at the Stented/Scaffolded Segments and the Proximal and Distal Edges.在植入 Absorb 依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架和 Xience V 依维莫司洗脱金属支架 1 年和 2 年后的血管舒缩功能比较评估:来自血管内造影、离体评估以及支架/支架段和近端及远端边缘基因分析的体内观察结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 11;9(7):728-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.018.
8
Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Thrombosis: Multicenter Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Presentation, Mechanisms, and Predictors.生物可吸收冠状动脉支架血栓形成:多中心临床特征、机制和预测因素的综合分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;67(8):921-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.019.
9
A Polylactide Bioresorbable Scaffold Eluting Everolimus for Treatment of Coronary Stenosis: 5-Year Follow-Up.载有依维莫司的聚乳酸可吸收生物支架治疗冠状动脉狭窄:5 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 23;67(7):766-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.060.
10
Embolization of Fractured Bioresorbable Scaffold Struts: Insights From 2- and 3-Dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 22;9(4):e37-e38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.005. Epub 2016 Jan 6.