• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入 Fantom 依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收冠状动脉支架后的长期系列功能评估。

Long-term serial functional evaluation after implantation of the Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold.

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):431-436. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28804. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.28804
PMID:32077590
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) has been validated as an accurate surrogate of standard wire-based fractional flow reserve. The clinical and angiographic outcomes of the Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold (BRS) have been previously studied and reported. We investigate the functional performance of the Fantom BRS.

METHODS

The FANTOM II trial prospectively enrolled 240 patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina, of which 235 patients received the Fantom BRS and were included in the present analysis. We performed an independent serial QFR analysis of the target vessel at baseline, post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and at 6- or 9-month and 24-month follow-up, using a QFR threshold ≤0.80 to define functional ischemia.

RESULTS

QFR was analyzable in 178 patients at baseline, 185 post-PCI, 178 at 6- or 9-month follow-up, and 30 at 24-month follow-up. At baseline, 119 patients (66.9%) had a QFR ≤0.80, whereas 12 (6.5%) post-PCI, 13 (7.3%) at 6- or 9-month follow-up, and 3 (10.0%) at 24-month follow-up had a QFR ≤0.80. QFR improved from baseline to post-PCI, and decreased from post-PCI up to 24-month follow-up. During follow-up period, 28 patients (11.9%) had target vessel revascularization, of which 21 had analyzable QFR and 16 patients (76.1%) had QFR ≤0.80 at the time of revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-line serial QFR assessment demonstrated that around 30% patients did not have functionally significant lesions at baseline and the time with target vessel revascularization. PCI with the Fantom BRS improved functional ischemia with a slight decrease in QFR values over 24 months.

摘要

背景

定量血流比(QFR)已被验证为标准导丝血流储备分数的准确替代指标。 Fantom 西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收冠状动脉支架(BRS)的临床和血管造影结果已被先前研究和报道。我们研究了 Fantom BRS 的功能性能。

方法

FANTOM II 试验前瞻性纳入 240 例稳定性冠心病或不稳定型心绞痛患者,其中 235 例患者接受 Fantom BRS 治疗,并纳入本分析。我们对基线、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后以及 6 或 9 个月和 24 个月随访时的靶血管进行独立的连续 QFR 分析,使用 QFR 阈值≤0.80 来定义功能缺血。

结果

178 例患者在基线时、185 例患者在 PCI 后、178 例患者在 6 或 9 个月随访时、30 例患者在 24 个月随访时可进行 QFR 分析。基线时,119 例(66.9%)患者的 QFR≤0.80,而 PCI 后 12 例(6.5%)、6 或 9 个月随访时 13 例(7.3%)和 24 个月随访时 3 例(10.0%)患者的 QFR≤0.80。QFR 从基线到 PCI 后改善,并从 PCI 后一直到 24 个月随访时降低。随访期间,28 例(11.9%)患者行靶血管血运重建,其中 21 例患者可进行 QFR 分析,16 例(76.1%)患者在血运重建时 QFR≤0.80。

结论

离线连续 QFR 评估表明,约 30%的患者在基线和靶血管血运重建时没有功能显著病变。Fantom BRS 的 PCI 改善了功能缺血,QFR 值在 24 个月内略有下降。

相似文献

1
Long-term serial functional evaluation after implantation of the Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold.植入 Fantom 依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收冠状动脉支架后的长期系列功能评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):431-436. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28804. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Second generation, sirolimus-eluting, bioresorbable Tyrocore scaffold implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Baseline OCT and 30-day clinical outcomes - A FANTOM STEMI pilot study.二代依维莫司洗脱、生物可吸收 Tyrocore 支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的植入:基线 OCT 和 30 天临床结局——一项 FANTOM STEMI 先导研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28414. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Prognostic Value of QFR Measured Immediately After Successful Stent Implantation: The International Multicenter Prospective HAWKEYE Study.即刻测量血流储备分数对支架植入术后预后的预测价值:国际多中心前瞻性 HAWKEYE 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2079-2088. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
4
6-Month Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of a Novel Radiopaque Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The FANTOM II Study.新型放射显影西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架 6 个月的临床和血管造影结果:FANTOM II 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1832-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.033.
5
Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for 3-Vessel Disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 3 支病变后定量血流比值的临床意义。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2064-2075. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of immediate angiography derived residual quantitative flow ratio after bioresorbable scaffold and drug eluting stent implantation.生物可吸收支架和药物洗脱支架置入后即刻血管造影衍生的残余定量血流比的诊断准确性比较。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 12;23(2):59. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2302059.
7
Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the SYNTAX II Trial: Feasibility, Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio, and Clinical Prognostic Value of Functional SYNTAX Score Derived From Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With 3-Vessel Disease.SYNTAX II 试验中的血管造影衍生的分数流储备:在三血管病变患者中,定量血流比的可行性、诊断性能和源自定量血流比的功能性 SYNTAX 评分的临床预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 11;12(3):259-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.023.
8
Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation.药物洗脱支架置入术后 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者血流储备分数的临床意义。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Mar;37(3):755-766. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02068-0. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
9
A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.随机对照试验比较新一代雷帕霉素洗脱生物可吸收支架和金属依维莫司洗脱支架
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 12;11(3):260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.037.
10
Effects of diabetes mellitus on post-intervention coronary physiological assessment derived by quantitative flow ratio in patients with coronary artery disease underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.糖尿病对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者经定量血流比得出的介入后冠状动脉生理学评估的影响。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;186:109839. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109839. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of Postpercutaneous Coronary Intervention Murray-Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio: Post Hoc Analysis From FLAVOUR Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后基于Murray定律的定量血流比的预后价值:来自FLAVOUR试验的事后分析
JACC Asia. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.10.019. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Clinical Relevance of Impaired Physiological Assessment After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后生理评估受损的临床相关性:一项荟萃分析。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Sep 8;1(6):100448. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100448. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Below-the-Knee Arterial Disease: A Literature Review of New Developments.
用于膝下动脉疾病的生物可吸收支架:新进展的文献综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 3;25(4):133. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504133. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention?再血管化假象:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中是否有人能达到最佳的再血管化效果?
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024 Sep;21(9):652-662. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01014-0. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: State of the Art.基于血管造影的血流储备分数:现状。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Jun;24(6):667-678. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01687-4. Epub 2022 Apr 18.