Rigatelli Gianluca, Zuin Marco, Fong Alan, Tai Truyen Ttt, Nguyen Thach
Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions Unit, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Section of Internal and Cardiopulmonary Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
J Transl Int Med. 2019 Mar 29;7(1):22-28. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2019-0005. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Ostial LM stenting potentially induces turbulence in the aortic wall near the LM ostium, which might be correlated with aorta dilation and dissection. We investigated through a computational fluid dynamic analysis (CFD), the presence and potential consequences of flow turbulences both in the ascending aorta and arch after a stenting left main (LM) mid shaft or distal disease.
The model of the ascending aorta and left coronary artery was reconstructed reviewing both angiographic and echocardiographic measurements of 80 consecutive patients (43 males, mean age 75.1 ± 6.2 years) with significant LM mid shaft or distal disease treated in our institution. For stent simulation, a third-generation everolimus-eluting stent was reconstructed. Two stenting procedures (lesion 1:1 or ostial coverage) were investigated.
The net area averaged WSS of the model resulted higher when the stent covered the lesion 1:1 compared to the ostial coverage (3.68 . 2.06 Pa, =0.01 and 3.97 . 1.98 Pa, < 0.001, respectively). LM ostial coverage generates more turbulences in the LM itself, in the aortic wall at ostium level, and at the sino-tubular junction compared with the stenting of the lesion 1:1. Conversely, in the ascending aorta, the WSS appears lower when stenting the lesion 1:1.
Extending the stent coverage up to the ostium, when the ostial region is not diseased, might induce unfavorable alterations of flow; not only both at the level of the LM lesion and ostium sites, but also in the ascending aorta and aortic arch, potentially predisposing the aortic wall to long-term damage.
左主干(LM)开口处支架置入可能会在LM开口附近的主动脉壁内引发湍流,这可能与主动脉扩张和夹层形成相关。我们通过计算流体动力学分析(CFD),研究了左主干中段或远端病变支架置入术后升主动脉和主动脉弓内血流湍流的存在情况及其潜在后果。
回顾性分析了我院连续80例(43例男性,平均年龄75.1±6.2岁)患有显著左主干中段或远端病变患者的血管造影和超声心动图测量数据,重建了升主动脉和左冠状动脉模型。为进行支架模拟,重建了第三代依维莫司洗脱支架。研究了两种支架置入术(病变1:1覆盖或开口处覆盖)。
与开口处覆盖相比,当支架1:1覆盖病变时,模型的净面积平均壁面切应力更高(分别为3.68. 2.06 Pa,=0.01和3.97. 1.98 Pa,<0.001)。与1:1病变支架置入相比,LM开口处覆盖在LM本身、开口水平的主动脉壁以及窦管交界处产生更多湍流。相反,在升主动脉中,1:1病变支架置入时壁面切应力较低。
当开口区域无病变时,将支架覆盖范围扩展至开口处可能会引发血流的不利改变;不仅在LM病变和开口部位,而且在升主动脉和主动脉弓,可能使主动脉壁易于受到长期损伤。