Suppr超能文献

一项旨在提高瑞士学术性全科医疗中结直肠癌筛查接受率的提供者反馈干预措施。

A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice.

作者信息

Mota Pau, Auer Reto, Gouveia Alexandre, Selby Kevin

机构信息

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Mar 3;8(1):e000452. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000452. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) cancer screening uptake is low in our diverse, outpatient teaching clinic. A state-level public screening programme was recently launched that provides faecal immunochemical tests or screening colonoscopy to all citizens aged 50-69 years via mailed invitations, with the possibility of earlier, opportunistic inclusion. Mailed outreach is expected to be rolled out over the next 5 years. In the interim, we aimed to increase CRC screening by accelerating the inclusion of patients into the programme by implementing a provider feedback programme with residents. We used billing reports to define the eligible target population and monthly lists of included patients to track progress. All residents received a standard intervention that provided basic training and communication tools facilitating shared decision making in CRC screening decisions. We then developed and implemented the intervention over 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles in 2 of 4 groups of residents, each with 7 residents and approximately 250 eligible patients. The intervention consisted of individualised reports on the proportion of each resident's patients that had been included in the screening programme and the names of patients who had not yet been included. The first group that received the intervention had included 58 of 232 eligible patients (25%) at 8 months after the feedback intervention and the second group 51 of 249 eligible patients (20%) at 4 months. In comparison, the 2 groups with only the standard intervention had included 32 of 252 (13%) and 27 of 260 (10%) of their patients, respectively, at 11 months after the baseline intervention. These results suggest that provider feedback to medical residents can promote resident self-awareness and increase the proportion of patients included in a public programme when provided in addition to educational interventions.

摘要

在我们多元化的门诊教学诊所中,结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的接受率较低。最近启动了一项州级公共筛查计划,通过邮寄邀请为所有50至69岁的公民提供粪便免疫化学检测或筛查结肠镜检查,也有可能更早地进行机会性纳入。预计在未来5年内将开展邮寄宣传活动。在此期间,我们旨在通过与住院医师实施提供者反馈计划,加速患者纳入该计划,从而提高CRC筛查率。我们使用计费报告来确定符合条件的目标人群,并通过每月纳入患者名单来跟踪进展情况。所有住院医师都接受了标准干预,该干预提供了基本培训和沟通工具,有助于在CRC筛查决策中进行共同决策。然后,我们在4组住院医师中的2组中,通过3个计划-执行-研究-改进循环来开发和实施干预措施,每组有7名住院医师和约250名符合条件的患者。干预措施包括关于每位住院医师的患者被纳入筛查计划的比例以及尚未被纳入的患者姓名的个性化报告。接受干预的第一组在反馈干预8个月后,232名符合条件的患者中有58名(25%)被纳入;第二组在4个月后,249名符合条件的患者中有51名(20%)被纳入。相比之下,仅接受标准干预的2组在基线干预11个月后,其患者分别有252名中的32名(13%)和260名中的27名(10%)被纳入。这些结果表明,除了教育干预外,向住院医师提供提供者反馈可以提高住院医师的自我意识,并增加纳入公共计划的患者比例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f852/6440588/1140678edf20/bmjoq-2018-000452f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验