• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微生物组研究中的问题和当前控制标准。

Issues and current standards of controls in microbiome research.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Center for Microbiome Analyses and Therapeutics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 May 1;95(5). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz045.

DOI:10.1093/femsec/fiz045
PMID:30997495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469980/
Abstract

Good scientific practice is important in all areas of science. In recent years this has gained more and more attention, especially considering the 'scientific reproducibility crisis'. While most researchers are aware of the issues with good scientific practice, not all of these issues are necessarily clear, and the details can be very complicated. For many years it has been accepted to perform and publish sequencing based microbiome studies without including proper controls. Although in recent years more scientists realize the necessity of implementing controls, this poses a problem due to the complexity of the field. Another concern is the inability to properly interpret the information gained from controls in microbiome studies. Here, we will discuss these issues and provide a comprehensive overview of problematic points regarding controls in microbiome research, and of the current standards in this area.

摘要

良好的科学实践在科学的各个领域都很重要。近年来,这一点越来越受到关注,尤其是考虑到“科学可重复性危机”。虽然大多数研究人员都意识到良好的科学实践存在问题,但并非所有问题都清楚,而且细节可能非常复杂。多年来,人们一直接受在不包括适当对照的情况下进行基于测序的微生物组研究并发表相关结果。尽管近年来越来越多的科学家意识到实施对照的必要性,但由于该领域的复杂性,这带来了一个问题。另一个令人担忧的问题是无法正确解释从微生物组研究对照中获得的信息。在这里,我们将讨论这些问题,并全面概述微生物组研究中对照存在的问题点以及该领域的当前标准。

相似文献

1
Issues and current standards of controls in microbiome research.微生物组研究中的问题和当前控制标准。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 May 1;95(5). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz045.
2
Contamination in Low Microbial Biomass Microbiome Studies: Issues and Recommendations.低微生物生物量微生物组研究中的污染问题:问题与建议。
Trends Microbiol. 2019 Feb;27(2):105-117. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
3
Considerations for mosquito microbiome research from the Mosquito Microbiome Consortium.从蚊虫微生物组联盟角度出发对蚊虫微生物组研究的思考。
Microbiome. 2021 Feb 1;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00987-7.
4
Microbiome Data Science: Understanding Our Microbial Planet.微生物组数据科学:了解我们的微生物星球。
Trends Microbiol. 2016 Jun;24(6):425-427. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.02.011.
5
Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges.微生物组定义再探讨:旧概念和新挑战。
Microbiome. 2020 Jun 30;8(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0.
6
Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research.优化微生物组研究方法和避免陷阱。
Microbiome. 2017 May 5;5(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5.
7
The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice.动物认知研究的另一面:科学家对偏见、可重复性和科学实践的态度。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256607. eCollection 2021.
8
Best practices for analysing microbiomes.微生物组分析的最佳实践。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Jul;16(7):410-422. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0029-9.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Guidelines for Transparency on Gut Microbiome Studies in Essential and Experimental Hypertension.《基础与实验性高血压中肠道微生物组研究透明度指南》
Hypertension. 2019 Dec;74(6):1279-1293. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13079. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Subspecific variation in gut microbiota of North American bison in a sympatric setting reveals differentially abundant taxa.同域环境下北美野牛肠道微生物群的亚种变异揭示了丰度有差异的分类群。
Anim Microbiome. 2025 Aug 21;7(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s42523-025-00451-7.
2
Challenges and Opportunities in Analyzing Cancer-Associated Microbiomes.分析癌症相关微生物群的挑战与机遇
Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-3629.
3
Evaluation of an alternative positive control strain of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium for microbial assays.用于微生物检测的肠炎沙门氏菌肠炎亚种鼠伤寒血清型替代阳性对照菌株的评价
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 4;20(8):e0329363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329363. eCollection 2025.
4
The Impact of Whole-Animal Fluid Preservation on the Observed Gut Microbiome of Vertebrates: Implications for the Use of Museum Specimens in Microbiome Research.全动物体液保存对脊椎动物肠道微生物群的影响:对博物馆标本在微生物群研究中的应用的启示。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2025 Oct;25(7):e14127. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.14127. Epub 2025 May 26.
5
A HPLC-based Method for Counting the Genome Copy Number of Cells Allows the Production of a High-quality Mock Community of Bacterial Cells.一种基于高效液相色谱法的细胞基因组拷贝数计数方法可用于构建高质量的细菌细胞模拟群落。
Microbes Environ. 2025;40(2). doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME24076.
6
Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?家禽微生物群研究是否需要标准化的16S rRNA基因扩增子测序分析方案?
Poult Sci. 2025 Jul;104(7):105242. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105242. Epub 2025 May 1.
7
Influence of menstrual cycle and oral contraception on taxonomic composition and gas production in the gut microbiome.月经周期和口服避孕药对肠道微生物群分类组成及气体产生的影响。
J Med Microbiol. 2025 Mar;74(3). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001987.
8
Quantifying the impact of workshops promoting microbiome data standards and data stewardship.量化促进微生物组数据标准和数据管理的研讨会的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9887. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89991-1.
9
Blanking on blanks: few insect microbiota studies control for contaminants.忽视空白:昆虫微生物群研究中几乎没有对污染物进行控制。
mBio. 2025 Apr 9;16(4):e0265824. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02658-24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
10
Unveiling Microbiota Profiles in Saliva and Pancreatic Tissues of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.揭示胰腺癌患者唾液和胰腺组织中的微生物群特征。
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 9;13(1):119. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010119.

本文引用的文献

1
Controlling for Contaminants in Low-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Experiments.在低生物量16S rRNA基因测序实验中控制污染物
mSystems. 2019 Jun 4;4(4):e00290-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00290-19.
2
Gut mucosal virome alterations in ulcerative colitis.溃疡性结肠炎患者的肠道黏膜病毒组改变。
Gut. 2019 Jul;68(7):1169-1179. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318131. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
3
Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data.简单的统计鉴定和去除标记基因和宏基因组数据中的污染物序列。
Microbiome. 2018 Dec 17;6(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2.
4
Contamination in Low Microbial Biomass Microbiome Studies: Issues and Recommendations.低微生物生物量微生物组研究中的污染问题:问题与建议。
Trends Microbiol. 2019 Feb;27(2):105-117. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Ecologically informed microbial biomarkers and accurate classification of mixed and unmixed samples in an extensive cross-study of human body sites.在对人体部位进行广泛的跨研究中,具有生态意义的微生物生物标志物和对混合及未混合样本的准确分类。
Microbiome. 2018 Oct 24;6(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0565-6.
6
Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches.对去噪器进行去噪:微生物组序列错误校正方法的独立评估。
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 8;6:e5364. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5364. eCollection 2018.
7
Synthetic microbe communities provide internal reference standards for metagenome sequencing and analysis.人工合成微生物群落为宏基因组测序和分析提供了内部参考标准。
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 6;9(1):3096. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05555-0.
8
Conducting metagenomic studies in microbiology and clinical research.在微生物学和临床研究中进行宏基因组学研究。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Oct;102(20):8629-8646. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9209-9. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
9
Recognizing the reagent microbiome.识别试剂微生物群。
Nat Microbiol. 2018 Aug;3(8):851-853. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0202-y.
10
Detection and removal of barcode swapping in single-cell RNA-seq data.单细胞 RNA-seq 数据中条形码交换的检测与去除。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 10;9(1):2667. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05083-x.