Suppr超能文献

非重型血友病 A 患者突变对检测差异影响的计算机模拟和体外评估。

In silico and in vitro evaluation of the impact of mutations in non-severe haemophilia A patients on assay discrepancies.

机构信息

Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

Center for Rare Diseases Bonn (ZSEB), University Clinic Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2019 Aug;98(8):1855-1865. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03691-1. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Abstract

Haemophilia A (HA) is caused by a lack or reduced amount of factor VIII protein (FVIII). About one-third of patients with non-severe HA carrying specific missense mutations show discrepant results between FVIII activity (FVIII:C), measured by one-stage or chromogenic two-stage assays. The aim of this study was to elucidate the mechanism underlying the assay discrepancy in vitro and in silico. Thirteen missense mutations in the Factor 8-gene associated with discrepant results in patients were transiently expressed. FVIII:C of the mutations was determined using two one-stage assays (FVIII:C, FVIII:C) and a two-stage chromogenic assay (FVIII:C). Furthermore, thrombin generation test (TGT) and in silico analysis were performed to investigate the haemostatic potential as well as the structural impact of the variants, respectively. For the majority (9/13) of the analysed mutations, the discrepancy was confirmed. Moreover, we established a modified TGT protocol for in vitro characterization of FVIII. Hence, TGT parameters were significantly impaired in the group of variants associated with higher chromogenic values. Additionally, in silico analysis revealed the impact of the mutations on FVIII protein structure leading to assay discrepancy. Moreover, the data shows that also among one-stage clotting assays, assay discrepancy is observed. Our results show that for the majority of mutations, application of a global assay like TGT method could help to improve diagnosis or correct assessment of the severity of HA.

摘要

甲型血友病(HA)是由第八因子蛋白(FVIII)缺乏或减少引起的。大约三分之一的非严重 HA 患者携带特定的错义突变,在使用一步法或显色两步法检测 FVIII 活性(FVIII:C)时会出现不一致的结果。本研究旨在体外和计算机模拟阐明导致这种检测结果不一致的机制。瞬时表达了与患者检测结果不一致相关的 13 个因子 8 基因中的错义突变。使用两种一步法检测(FVIII:C 和 FVIII:C)和一种两步显色法(FVIII:C)测定突变的 FVIII:C。此外,进行血栓生成试验(TGT)和计算机模拟分析分别以研究变体的止血潜力和结构影响。对于分析的大多数突变(9/13),差异得到了确认。此外,我们建立了一种改良的 TGT 方案,用于体外表征 FVIII。因此,与较高显色值相关的变异组的 TGT 参数显著受损。此外,计算机模拟分析显示了突变对 FVIII 蛋白结构的影响,导致检测结果不一致。此外,数据表明,即使在一步凝血检测中,也会出现检测结果不一致的情况。我们的研究结果表明,对于大多数突变,应用像 TGT 方法这样的全局检测方法可以帮助改善 HA 的诊断或正确评估其严重程度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验