Institute of Experimental Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Clinic Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Hamostaseologie. 2010 Nov;30(4):207-11.
Severity of bleeding phenotype in hemophilia A (HA) depends on the underlying mutation in the F8 gene and, ultimately, on the concentration and functional integrity of the factor VIII (FVIII) protein in circulating plasma. Initial diagnosis for HA and monitoring of treatment is typically performed by measuring of FVIII activity by either one-stage assay or chromogenic assay. We review evidence for why both types of assay do not give comparable results in a significant proportion of patients with non-severe haemophilia A and why the discrepancy in results between both methods segregates with distinct subclasses of known missense mutations causing haemophilia A. The current understanding of the mechanistic basis for how FVIII:C assay discrepancies arise are discussed.
We propose that both methods should be used in initial patient diagnosis along with follow-up genetic analysis to avoid potential misdiagnosis and to optimize treatment monitoring of patients with HA phenotypes.
血友病 A(HA)的出血表型严重程度取决于 F8 基因的基础突变,最终取决于循环血浆中因子 VIII(FVIII)蛋白的浓度和功能完整性。HA 的初始诊断和治疗监测通常通过测定 FVIII 活性来进行,方法是一步法或显色法。我们回顾了为什么在相当一部分非重度血友病 A 患者中,这两种类型的检测都不能得到可比的结果,以及两种方法之间的差异与导致血友病 A 的已知错义突变的不同亚类如何分离的证据。讨论了当前对 FVIII:C 检测差异产生的机制基础的理解。
我们建议在初始患者诊断中同时使用这两种方法,并结合后续的基因分析,以避免潜在的误诊,并优化 HA 表型患者的治疗监测。