Suppr超能文献

情绪面孔是否能吸引注意力,这是否取决于意识?来自视觉探测范式的证据。

Do emotional faces capture attention, and does this depend on awareness? Evidence from the visual probe paradigm.

机构信息

School of Clinical Language Sciences.

Centre for Vision and Cognition, Department of Psychology and Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jun;45(6):790-802. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000640. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

Abstract

The visual probe (VP) paradigm provides evidence that emotional stimuli attract attention. Such effects have been reported even when stimuli are presented outside of awareness. These findings have shaped the idea that humans possess a processing pathway that detects evolutionarily significant signals independently of awareness. Here, we addressed 2 unresolved questions: First, if emotional stimuli attract attention, is this driven by their affective content, or by low-level image properties (e.g., luminance contrast)? Second, does attentional capture occur under conditions of genuine unawareness? We found that observers preferentially allocated attention to emotional faces under aware viewing conditions. However, this effect was best explained by low-level stimulus properties, rather than emotional content. When stimuli were presented outside of awareness (via continuous flash suppression or masking), we found no evidence that attention was directed toward emotional face stimuli. Finally, observer's awareness of the stimuli (assessed by d') predicted attentional cuing. Our data challenge existing literature: First, we cast doubt on the notion of preferential attention to emotional stimuli in the absence of awareness. Second, we question whether effects revealed by the VP paradigm genuinely reflect emotion-sensitive processes, instead suggesting they can be more parsimoniously explained by low-level variability between stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

视觉探针 (VP) 范式为情绪刺激吸引注意力提供了证据。即使在刺激处于无意识状态下呈现时,也会出现这种效应。这些发现形成了这样一种观点,即人类具有一种独立于意识检测到进化上有意义信号的处理途径。在这里,我们解决了两个未解决的问题:首先,如果情绪刺激吸引注意力,那么这是由其情感内容驱动的,还是由低水平的图像属性(例如,亮度对比度)驱动的?其次,在真正无意识的条件下是否会发生注意力捕获?我们发现,观察者在有意识的观察条件下优先分配注意力给情绪面孔。然而,这种效应最好由低水平的刺激属性来解释,而不是由情绪内容来解释。当刺激在无意识状态下呈现(通过连续闪光抑制或掩蔽)时,我们没有发现注意力被引导到情绪面孔刺激的证据。最后,观察者对刺激的意识(通过 d'评估)预测了注意力提示。我们的数据对现有文献提出了挑战:首先,我们对在没有意识的情况下优先注意情绪刺激的观点表示怀疑。其次,我们质疑 VP 范式揭示的效应是否真正反映了对情绪敏感的过程,或者是否可以更简洁地用刺激之间的低水平可变性来解释。(APA 心理信息数据库记录(c),保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验