• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪面孔是否能吸引注意力,这是否取决于意识?来自视觉探测范式的证据。

Do emotional faces capture attention, and does this depend on awareness? Evidence from the visual probe paradigm.

机构信息

School of Clinical Language Sciences.

Centre for Vision and Cognition, Department of Psychology and Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jun;45(6):790-802. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000640. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000640
PMID:30998068
Abstract

The visual probe (VP) paradigm provides evidence that emotional stimuli attract attention. Such effects have been reported even when stimuli are presented outside of awareness. These findings have shaped the idea that humans possess a processing pathway that detects evolutionarily significant signals independently of awareness. Here, we addressed 2 unresolved questions: First, if emotional stimuli attract attention, is this driven by their affective content, or by low-level image properties (e.g., luminance contrast)? Second, does attentional capture occur under conditions of genuine unawareness? We found that observers preferentially allocated attention to emotional faces under aware viewing conditions. However, this effect was best explained by low-level stimulus properties, rather than emotional content. When stimuli were presented outside of awareness (via continuous flash suppression or masking), we found no evidence that attention was directed toward emotional face stimuli. Finally, observer's awareness of the stimuli (assessed by d') predicted attentional cuing. Our data challenge existing literature: First, we cast doubt on the notion of preferential attention to emotional stimuli in the absence of awareness. Second, we question whether effects revealed by the VP paradigm genuinely reflect emotion-sensitive processes, instead suggesting they can be more parsimoniously explained by low-level variability between stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

视觉探针 (VP) 范式为情绪刺激吸引注意力提供了证据。即使在刺激处于无意识状态下呈现时,也会出现这种效应。这些发现形成了这样一种观点,即人类具有一种独立于意识检测到进化上有意义信号的处理途径。在这里,我们解决了两个未解决的问题:首先,如果情绪刺激吸引注意力,那么这是由其情感内容驱动的,还是由低水平的图像属性(例如,亮度对比度)驱动的?其次,在真正无意识的条件下是否会发生注意力捕获?我们发现,观察者在有意识的观察条件下优先分配注意力给情绪面孔。然而,这种效应最好由低水平的刺激属性来解释,而不是由情绪内容来解释。当刺激在无意识状态下呈现(通过连续闪光抑制或掩蔽)时,我们没有发现注意力被引导到情绪面孔刺激的证据。最后,观察者对刺激的意识(通过 d'评估)预测了注意力提示。我们的数据对现有文献提出了挑战:首先,我们对在没有意识的情况下优先注意情绪刺激的观点表示怀疑。其次,我们质疑 VP 范式揭示的效应是否真正反映了对情绪敏感的过程,或者是否可以更简洁地用刺激之间的低水平可变性来解释。(APA 心理信息数据库记录(c),保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Do emotional faces capture attention, and does this depend on awareness? Evidence from the visual probe paradigm.情绪面孔是否能吸引注意力,这是否取决于意识?来自视觉探测范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jun;45(6):790-802. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000640. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
2
Faces and awareness: low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance.面孔与意识:决定知觉优势的是低水平而非情感因素。
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):537-44. doi: 10.1037/a0031403. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
3
Face proprioception does not modulate access to visual awareness of emotional faces in a continuous flash suppression paradigm.在连续闪光抑制范式中,面部本体感觉不会调节对情绪面孔视觉觉知的通达。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 May;51:166-180. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
When emotions guide your attention in line with a context-specific goal: Rapid utilization of visible and masked emotional faces for anticipatory attentional orienting.当情绪与特定情境的目标一致引导你的注意力时:快速利用可见和隐藏的情绪面孔进行预期的注意定向。
Emotion. 2020 Oct;20(7):1206-1224. doi: 10.1037/emo0000621. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
No effect of value learning on awareness and attention for faces: Evidence from continuous flash suppression and the attentional blink.价值学习对面孔的意识和注意力没有影响:来自连续闪光抑制和注意瞬脱的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Aug;47(8):1043-1055. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000923.
6
Enhanced conscious processing and blindsight-like detection of fear-conditioned stimuli under continuous flash suppression.在持续闪光抑制下对恐惧条件刺激的增强的意识加工和类盲视检测。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3333-3344. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5064-7. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
Attending to emotional faces in the flanker task: Probably much less automatic than previously assumed.在侧抑制任务中注意情绪面孔:可能远不如之前假设的那么自动。
Emotion. 2020 Mar;20(2):217-235. doi: 10.1037/emo0000538. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Attention for emotional faces under restricted awareness revisited: do emotional faces automatically attract attention?受限意识下对情绪面孔的注意再探讨:情绪面孔会自动吸引注意吗?
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):285-95. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.285.
9
Unconscious pupillometry: An effect of "attentional contagion" in the absence of visual awareness.无意识瞳孔测量:在没有视觉意识的情况下“注意力传染”的一种效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):302-308. doi: 10.1037/xge0000927. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
10
Processing of stimulus content but not of emotional valence is altered in persons with Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征患者对刺激内容而非情感效价的处理发生了改变。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):993-1009. doi: 10.1111/jir.12319. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-relevant facial threat attracts peripheral attention.与自身相关的面部威胁吸引外周注意力。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 29;15(1):31923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15695-1.
2
Perceptual, Not Attentional, Guidance Drives Happy Superiority in Complex Visual Search.在复杂视觉搜索中,是感知而非注意力引导驱动了快乐优势效应。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(2):124. doi: 10.3390/bs15020124.
3
No evidence of attentional prioritization for threatening targets in visual search.没有证据表明在视觉搜索中对威胁性目标进行注意力优先处理。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56265-1.
4
Attentional capture by fearful faces requires consciousness and is modulated by task-relevancy: A dot-probe EEG study.恐惧面孔引起的注意捕获需要意识并受任务相关性调节:一项点探测脑电图研究。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 23;17:1152220. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1152220. eCollection 2023.
5
Prioritization of emotional faces is not driven by emotional content.优先处理情绪面孔不受情绪内容的驱动。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 11;13(1):549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25575-7.
6
Raising awareness about measurement error in research on unconscious mental processes.提高对无意识心理过程研究中测量误差的认识。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):21-43. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01923-y. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
The image features of emotional faces that predict the initial eye movement to a face.情绪面孔的图像特征可预测对人脸的初始眼动。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87881-w.
8
Reversing the Luminance Polarity of Control Faces: Why Are Some Negative Faces Harder to Recognize, but Easier to See?反转对照面孔的亮度极性:为什么有些负面面孔更难识别,但却更容易看到?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 21;11:609045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609045. eCollection 2020.
9
Contextually-Based Social Attention Diverges across Covert and Overt Measures.基于情境的社会注意力在隐蔽和公开测量中存在差异。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jun 10;3(2):29. doi: 10.3390/vision3020029.