• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下单排缝合桥加强修复术是否能降低巨大肩袖撕裂的再撕裂率?

Does Arthroscopic Suture-Spanning Augmentation of Single-Row Repair Reduce the Retear Rate of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1420-1426. doi: 10.1177/0363546519836419. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1177/0363546519836419
PMID:30998402
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several surgical techniques have been proposed for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs), but the failure rates remain high. The suture-spanning augmentation technique of single-row (SSA-SR) repair was shown to reduce failure rates in cadaveric studies, but the outcome in vivo remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine if adding spanning sutures to SR repair during MRCT repairs can improve functional outcome and reduce failure rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

The study included 71 patients with a diagnosed MRCT. The study group (n = 35) received SSA-SR repair. The control (n = 36) received SR repair. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) score, and visual analog scale for pain were assessed preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging was arranged at 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the rotator cuff.

RESULTS

At 6 months postoperatively, the overall retear rate was 31.0%. The retear rate was lower in the SSA-SR group (14.3%) than in the SR group (47.2%, P = .002). At 24 months, the SSA-SR group had markedly improved ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores in comparison with the SR group ( P < .05). Within both groups, all scores had significant improvement as compared with the preoperative status ( P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The SSA-SR repair technique showed improved functional and radiologic results. Based on the superior postoperative outcome of this technique, the SSA-SR repair technique can be a potential treatment option for MRCT repair.

REGISTRATION

NCT03609164 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

摘要

背景

对于巨大肩袖撕裂(MRCT),已经提出了几种手术技术,但失败率仍然很高。在尸体研究中,单排缝合跨越增强技术(SSA-SR)修复显示可以降低失败率,但体内结果尚不清楚。

目的

确定在 MRCT 修复中,在 SR 修复中添加跨越缝线是否可以改善功能结果并降低失败率。

研究设计

随机对照试验;证据水平,2。

方法

该研究纳入了 71 例诊断为 MRCT 的患者。研究组(n = 35)接受 SSA-SR 修复。对照组(n = 36)接受 SR 修复。术前和术后 24 个月评估美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分、Constant 评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分和疼痛视觉模拟评分。术后 6 个月安排磁共振成像(MRI)以评估肩袖。

结果

术后 6 个月时,总再撕裂率为 31.0%。SSA-SR 组的再撕裂率(14.3%)低于 SR 组(47.2%,P =.002)。术后 24 个月时,SSA-SR 组的 ASES、Constant 和 UCLA 评分明显高于 SR 组(P <.05)。在两组中,与术前相比,所有评分均有显著改善(P <.05)。

结论

SSA-SR 修复技术显示出改善的功能和影像学结果。基于该技术术后的优异结果,SSA-SR 修复技术可能是 MRCT 修复的一种潜在治疗选择。

登记

NCT03609164(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符)。

相似文献

1
Does Arthroscopic Suture-Spanning Augmentation of Single-Row Repair Reduce the Retear Rate of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear?关节镜下单排缝合桥加强修复术是否能降低巨大肩袖撕裂的再撕裂率?
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1420-1426. doi: 10.1177/0363546519836419. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
2
The Clinical Effect of a Rotator Cuff Retear: A Meta-analysis of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Repairs.肩袖撕裂的临床效果:关节镜下单排和双排修复的Meta分析
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):733-741. doi: 10.1177/0363546516652900. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Prospective randomized clinical trial of single- versus double-row suture anchor repair in 2- to 4-cm rotator cuff tears: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results.单排与双排缝线锚定修复 2-4cm 肩袖撕裂的前瞻性随机临床试验:临床和磁共振成像结果。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Apr;27(4):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.11.059.
4
Modified suture-bridge technique to prevent a marginal dog-ear deformity improves structural integrity after rotator cuff repair.改良缝线桥技术预防边缘“狗耳”畸形可改善肩袖修复后的结构完整性。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):597-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546514562175. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.关节镜下肩袖修复后修复完整性和功能结果:双排与缝线桥技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):294-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511425657. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
6
Comparison of Structural Integrity and Functional Outcome Between Delaminated and Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears After En Masse Arthroscopic Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.全关节镜修复后层裂与非层裂肩袖撕裂的结构完整性和功能结果比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1411-1419. doi: 10.1177/0363546519838257.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.改良梅森-艾伦单排修复术治疗滑囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂的临床结果:与双排缝线桥技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
8
Arthroscopic Repair of the Isolated Subscapularis Full-Thickness Tear: Single- Versus Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.关节镜下治疗孤立性肩胛下肌全层撕裂:单排与双排缝合桥技术比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1427-1433. doi: 10.1177/0363546519838281.
9
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Graft Augmentation of 3-Dimensional Biological Collagen for Moderate to Large Tears: A Randomized Controlled Study.关节镜下带三维生物胶原补片增强的肩袖修补术治疗中到大面积肩袖撕裂:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1424-1431. doi: 10.1177/0363546518756978. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
10
Outcomes of Combined Bone Marrow Stimulation and Patch Augmentation for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.联合骨髓刺激和补片增强治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):963-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546515625044. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the outcomes of large to massive rotator cuff tears treated with direct repair, graft augmentation, or superior capsular reconstruction.一项关于采用直接修复、移植物增强或关节囊上重建治疗大型至巨大型肩袖撕裂结局的荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Aug 20;35(1):354. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04488-x.
2
Revision rates and progression to shoulder arthroplasty after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears.巨大肩袖撕裂关节镜修复术后的翻修率及进展至肩关节置换术的情况。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jun;33(6):2255-2268. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12651. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
3
Surgical management for massive rotator cuff tears: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
巨大肩袖撕裂的手术治疗:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Burns Trauma. 2024 Feb 9;12:tkad052. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad052. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk factors for symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study.症状性肩袖撕裂的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 4;10:1321939. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1321939. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient-reported outcome tools and baseline scores vary by country and region for arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.针对巨大肩袖撕裂关节镜修复,患者报告结局工具和基线评分因国家和地区而异:一项系统评价。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Jun 10;3(3):312-317. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.05.008. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
A biomechanical comparison of a mesh suture to a polyblend suture in a porcine tendon model.猪肌腱模型中网状缝线与混合缝线的生物力学比较。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):450. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1065.