Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1420-1426. doi: 10.1177/0363546519836419. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
Several surgical techniques have been proposed for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs), but the failure rates remain high. The suture-spanning augmentation technique of single-row (SSA-SR) repair was shown to reduce failure rates in cadaveric studies, but the outcome in vivo remains unclear.
To determine if adding spanning sutures to SR repair during MRCT repairs can improve functional outcome and reduce failure rates.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
The study included 71 patients with a diagnosed MRCT. The study group (n = 35) received SSA-SR repair. The control (n = 36) received SR repair. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) score, and visual analog scale for pain were assessed preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging was arranged at 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the rotator cuff.
At 6 months postoperatively, the overall retear rate was 31.0%. The retear rate was lower in the SSA-SR group (14.3%) than in the SR group (47.2%, P = .002). At 24 months, the SSA-SR group had markedly improved ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores in comparison with the SR group ( P < .05). Within both groups, all scores had significant improvement as compared with the preoperative status ( P < .05).
The SSA-SR repair technique showed improved functional and radiologic results. Based on the superior postoperative outcome of this technique, the SSA-SR repair technique can be a potential treatment option for MRCT repair.
NCT03609164 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
对于巨大肩袖撕裂(MRCT),已经提出了几种手术技术,但失败率仍然很高。在尸体研究中,单排缝合跨越增强技术(SSA-SR)修复显示可以降低失败率,但体内结果尚不清楚。
确定在 MRCT 修复中,在 SR 修复中添加跨越缝线是否可以改善功能结果并降低失败率。
随机对照试验;证据水平,2。
该研究纳入了 71 例诊断为 MRCT 的患者。研究组(n = 35)接受 SSA-SR 修复。对照组(n = 36)接受 SR 修复。术前和术后 24 个月评估美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分、Constant 评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分和疼痛视觉模拟评分。术后 6 个月安排磁共振成像(MRI)以评估肩袖。
术后 6 个月时,总再撕裂率为 31.0%。SSA-SR 组的再撕裂率(14.3%)低于 SR 组(47.2%,P =.002)。术后 24 个月时,SSA-SR 组的 ASES、Constant 和 UCLA 评分明显高于 SR 组(P <.05)。在两组中,与术前相比,所有评分均有显著改善(P <.05)。
SSA-SR 修复技术显示出改善的功能和影像学结果。基于该技术术后的优异结果,SSA-SR 修复技术可能是 MRCT 修复的一种潜在治疗选择。
NCT03609164(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符)。