Xiao Yuyang, Fu Xianghua, Wang Yanbo, Fan Yanming, Wu Yanqiang, Wang Wenlu, Zhang Qian
Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Dec;30(8):555-563. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000743.
This study aimed at evaluating efficacy and safety of thrombus aspiration and intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis on coronary thrombus burden in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous catheterization, comparing their effects on myocardial perfusion through index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
From January 2017 to January 2018, STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary catheterization were enrolled and randomly assigned to receiving thrombus aspiration (TA group) or intracoronary thrombolysis (IT group). IMR, SPECT, and other conventional measurements were adopted to assess myocardial perfusion. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and complications were recorded over a 90-day follow-up and a 12-month follow-up after the procedure.
The study consisted of 38 patients in the IT group and 33 in the TA group. After recanalization, thrombus burden score, corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, the proportion of TIMI myocardial perfusion 3 grade, and IMR in the IT group were significantly better than those of the TA group (P<0.05). During the 90-day follow-up, no difference was observed in cardiac function and MACEs. During the 12-month follow-up, there were significant differences in infarct size of SPECT (18.56±8.56 vs. 22.67±7.66, P=0.046), left ventricular ejection fraction of echocardiography (58.13±5.92 vs. 55.17±5.68, P=0.043), and the composite MACEs between the two groups (P=0.034).
Thrombus aspiration and intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis are effective and safe strategies in managing high coronary thrombus burden in STEMI patients. Compared with aspiration, intracoronary-targeted thrombolysis is more beneficial in improving myocardial microcirculation perfusion.
本研究旨在评估血栓抽吸术和冠状动脉内靶向溶栓术对接受直接经皮导管介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者冠状动脉血栓负荷的疗效和安全性,并通过微循环阻力指数(IMR)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)比较它们对心肌灌注的影响。
2017年1月至2018年1月,纳入接受直接导管介入治疗且血栓负荷高的STEMI患者,并随机分配接受血栓抽吸术(TA组)或冠状动脉内溶栓术(IT组)。采用IMR、SPECT和其他传统测量方法评估心肌灌注。在术后90天随访期和12个月随访期记录主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和并发症。
该研究包括38例IT组患者和33例TA组患者。再通后,IT组的血栓负荷评分、校正的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)帧数、TIMI心肌灌注3级比例和IMR均显著优于TA组(P<0.05)。在90天随访期内,心功能和MACE方面未观察到差异。在12个月随访期内,两组在SPECT梗死面积(18.56±8.56对22.67±7.66,P=0.046)、超声心动图左心室射血分数(58.13±5.92对55.17±5.68,P=0.043)以及复合MACE方面存在显著差异(P=0.034)。
血栓抽吸术和冠状动脉内靶向溶栓术是治疗STEMI患者高冠状动脉血栓负荷的有效且安全的策略。与抽吸术相比,冠状动脉内靶向溶栓术在改善心肌微循环灌注方面更有益。