M. C. Avery, Department of Orthopaedics, Memorial Regional Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL, USA S. Jo, A. Chang, C. McAndrew, A. N. Miller, S. Tang, Department of Orthopaedics, Washington University in School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA W. M. Ricci, Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1249-1255. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000683.
Transverse patella fractures are often treated with cannulated screws and a figure-of-eight anterior tension band. A common teaching regarding this construct is to recess the screws so that their distal ends do not protrude beyond the patella because doing so may improve biomechanical performance. However, there is a lack of biomechanical or clinical data to support this recommendation.
In the treatment of transverse patella fractures, is there a difference between prominent and recessed cannulated screw constructs, supplemented by tension banding, in terms of gap formation from cyclic loading and ultimate load to failure?
Ten pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver legs (mean donor age, 72 years; range, 64-89 years) were randomized in a pairwise fashion to prominent or standard-length screws. In the prominent screw group, screw length was 15% longer than the measured trajectory, resulting in 4 to 6 mm of additional length. Each patella was transversely osteotomized at its midportion and fixed with screws and an anterior tension band. Gap formation was measured over 40 loaded flexion-extension cycles (90° to 5°). Ultimate load to failure was assessed with a final monotonic test after cyclic loading. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) of each patella was measured with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). There was no difference in BMD between the recessed (1.06 ± 0.262 g/cm) and prominent (1.03 ± 0.197 g/cm) screw groups (p = 0.846). Difference in gap formation was assessed with a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Ultimate load to failure and BMD were assessed with a paired t-test.
Patella fractures fixed with prominent cannulated screws demonstrated larger gap formation during cyclic loading. Median gap size at the end of cyclic loading was 0.13 mm (range, 0.00-2.92 mm) for the recessed screw group and 0.77 mm (range, 0.00-7.50 mm) for the prominent screw group (p = 0.039; 95% confidence interval [CI] difference of geometric means, 0.05-2.12 mm). There was no difference in ultimate failure load between the recessed screw (891 ± 258 N) and prominent screw (928 ± 268 N) groups (p = 0.751; 95% CI difference of means, -226 to 301 N). Ultimate failure load was correlated with areal BMD (r = 0.468; p = 0.046).
In this cadaver study, when using cannulated screws and a figure-of-eight tension band to fix transverse patella fractures, prominent screws reduced the construct's ability to resist gap formation during cyclic loading testing.
This biomechanical cadaver study found that the use of prominent cannulated screws for the fixation of transverse patella fractures increases the likelihood of interfragmentary gap formation, which may potentially increase the risk of fracture nonunion and implant failure. These findings suggest that proximally and distally recessed screws may increase construct stability, which may increase the potential for bony healing. The findings support further laboratory and clinical investigations comparing recessed screws supplemented by anterior tension banding with other repair methods that are in common use, such as transosseous suture repair.
横向髌骨骨折通常采用空心螺钉和八字形前张力带固定。关于这种结构的一个常见教学观点是将螺钉嵌入,使其远端不突出髌骨,因为这样可以改善生物力学性能。然而,缺乏生物力学或临床数据来支持这一建议。
在治疗横向髌骨骨折时,对于用张力带固定的突出和嵌入空心螺钉结构,在循环加载和最终失效时的极限载荷下,间隙形成是否存在差异?
10 对新鲜冷冻尸体腿(平均供体年龄,72 岁;范围,64-89 岁)以成对的方式随机分为突出或标准长度螺钉。在突出螺钉组中,螺钉长度比测量的轨迹长 15%,从而增加了 4 到 6 毫米的额外长度。每个髌骨在中部进行横向截断,并采用螺钉和前张力带固定。在 40 次加载的屈伸循环(90°至 5°)中测量间隙形成。在最后一次单调测试后评估最终失效极限载荷。用双能 X 线吸收法(DEXA)测量每个髌骨的面积骨密度(BMD)。嵌入(1.06±0.262 g/cm)和突出(1.03±0.197 g/cm)螺钉组之间的 BMD 无差异(p=0.846)。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验评估间隙形成的差异。采用配对 t 检验评估最终失效极限载荷和 BMD。
用突出空心螺钉固定的髌骨骨折在循环加载过程中显示出更大的间隙形成。在循环加载结束时,嵌入螺钉组的中位间隙大小为 0.13 毫米(范围,0.00-2.92 毫米),突出螺钉组为 0.77 毫米(范围,0.00-7.50 毫米)(p=0.039;95%置信区间[CI]几何均值差异,0.05-2.12 毫米)。嵌入螺钉(891±258 N)和突出螺钉(928±268 N)组之间的最终失效极限载荷无差异(p=0.751;95%CI 均值差异,-226 至 301 N)。最终失效极限载荷与面积 BMD 相关(r=0.468;p=0.046)。
在这项尸体研究中,当使用空心螺钉和八字形张力带固定横向髌骨骨折时,突出螺钉降低了结构在循环加载测试中抵抗间隙形成的能力。
这项生物力学尸体研究发现,使用突出的空心螺钉固定横向髌骨骨折会增加骨折间隙形成的可能性,这可能会增加骨折不愈合和植入物失败的风险。这些发现表明,近端和远端嵌入螺钉可能会增加结构稳定性,从而增加骨愈合的潜力。研究结果支持进一步的实验室和临床研究,比较用八字形前张力带固定的嵌入螺钉与其他常用修复方法,如经皮缝线修复。