Biomechanical Comparison of Tension Band Fixation of Patella Transverse Fracture: Headless Screws Versus Headed Screws.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the stability and strength of tension band wire fixation using headless compression screws versus headed screws for transverse patella fractures.

METHODS

Six matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with transverse osteotomies created at the midpoint of the patella were surgically fixed, with one knee randomly receiving fixation with headless screws (Acumed Acutrak 4/5) and the other with headed screws (Synthes 4.0 partially threaded cannulated screws). The specimens were mounted onto a servohydraulic load frame in a 45-degree flexed position and loaded through the quadriceps tendon. Interfragmentary movement was recorded with a motion analysis system. The initial fixation stiffness, range of interfragmentary motion, and strength of the headless screw construct were compared with the headed screw construct. Failure was defined as either a sudden drop in applied tendon force or 2 mm of separation on the anterior surface of the patella (ie, clinical failure), whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

Mean primary interfragmentary motion was 0.31 ± 0.28 degrees for the headed screws and 0.10 ± 0.06 degrees for headless screws under 150 N load (P = 0.03). Mean construct stiffness was 277 ± 243 N/degrees for the headed screws and 510 ± 362 N/degrees for the headless screws (P = 0.03). None of the constructs from either group displayed structural failure before reaching the clinical failure gap of 2 mm. The mean clinical failure strength was 808 ± 183 N for the headless screws construct and 520 ± 241 N for the headed screws construct (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Headless screw tension band fixation demonstrated superior biomechanical behaviors over standard headed screw fixation with higher construct rigidity, smaller interfragmentary motion, and greater fixation strength.