Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Department of Art Studies, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 18;14(4):e0215202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215202. eCollection 2019.
Several self-report measures of conspiracist beliefs have been developed in Western populations, but examination of their psychometric properties outside Europe and North America is limited. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of three widely-used measures of conspiracist beliefs in Iran. We translated the Belief in Conspiracy Theory Inventory (BCTI), Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ), and Generic Conspiracist Belief Scale (GCBS) into Persian. Factorial validity was examined using principal-axis factor analysis in a community sample from Tehran, Iran (N = 544). Further, the relationships between scores on these measures and hypothesized antecedents (i.e., education, schizotypal personality, information processing style, superstitious beliefs, religiosity, and political orientation) were examined. Overall, we failed to find support for the parent factor structures of two of the three scales (BCTI and GCBS) and evidence of construct validity for all three scales was limited. These results highlight the necessity of further psychometric work on existing measures of conspiracy theories in diverse culturo-linguistic groups and the development of context-specific measures of conspiracist beliefs.
已经在西方人群中开发出了几种自我报告的阴谋信念测量方法,但在欧洲和北美以外地区对其心理测量特性的检验是有限的。本研究旨在检验在伊朗使用的三种广泛的阴谋信念测量方法的心理测量特性。我们将信仰阴谋理论量表(BCTI)、阴谋心态问卷(CMQ)和通用阴谋信念量表(GCBS)翻译成波斯语。在伊朗德黑兰的一个社区样本中(N=544),使用主轴因子分析检验了因子有效性。此外,还检验了这些测量方法的得分与假设的先行因素(即教育、精神分裂型人格、信息处理风格、迷信信仰、宗教信仰和政治取向)之间的关系。总的来说,我们没有发现支持这三个量表中的两个量表(BCTI 和 GCBS)的母体因子结构的证据,而且所有三个量表的结构效度证据都很有限。这些结果强调了在不同文化语言群体中对现有的阴谋论测量方法进行进一步心理测量工作的必要性,以及制定特定于情境的阴谋信念测量方法的必要性。