School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK.
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, UK.
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 18;9(1):6298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42456-8.
Protein therapy holds great promise for treating a variety of diseases. To act on intracellular targets, therapeutic proteins must cross the plasma membrane. This has previously been achieved by covalent attachment to a variety of cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs). However, there is limited information on the relative performance of CPPs in delivering proteins to cells, specifically the cytosol and other intracellular locations. Here we use green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a model cargo to compare delivery capacity of five CPP sequences (Penetratin, R8, TAT, Transportan, Xentry) and cyclic derivatives in different human cell lines (HeLa, HEK, 10T1/2, HepG2) representing different tissues. Confocal microscopy analysis indicates that most fusion proteins when incubated with cells at 10 µM localise to endosomes. Quantification of cellular uptake by flow cytometry reveals that uptake depends on both cell type (10T1/2 > HepG2 > HeLa > HEK), and CPP sequence (Transportan > R8 > Penetratin≈TAT > Xentry). CPP sequence cyclisation or addition of a HA-sequence increased cellular uptake, but fluorescence was still contained in vesicles with no evidence of endosomal escape. Our results provide a guide to select CPP for endosomal/lysosomal delivery and a basis for developing more efficient CPPs in the future.
蛋白质疗法在治疗多种疾病方面具有巨大的潜力。为了作用于细胞内靶点,治疗性蛋白质必须穿过质膜。这以前是通过与各种细胞穿透肽(CPP)共价连接来实现的。然而,关于 CPP 将蛋白质递送到细胞内,特别是细胞质和其他细胞内位置的相对性能的信息有限。在这里,我们使用绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)作为模型货物,比较了五种 CPP 序列(Penetratin、R8、TAT、Transportan、Xentry)和不同人细胞系(HeLa、HEK、10T1/2、HepG2)中环化衍生物的递送能力,这些细胞系代表不同的组织。共焦显微镜分析表明,大多数融合蛋白在 10 μM 时与细胞孵育时定位于内体。通过流式细胞术定量细胞摄取表明,摄取取决于细胞类型(10T1/2> HepG2> HeLa> HEK)和 CPP 序列(Transportan> R8> Penetratin≈TAT> Xentry)。CPP 序列环化或添加 HA 序列增加了细胞摄取,但荧光仍包含在囊泡中,没有内体逃逸的证据。我们的结果为选择用于内体/溶酶体递送的 CPP 提供了指导,并为未来开发更有效的 CPP 奠定了基础。