• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年对基因检测研究中风险的理解与认知:一项初步研究

Older Teens' Understanding and Perceptions of Risks in Studies With Genetic Testing: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Ittenbach Richard F, Corsmo Jeremy J, Miller Robert V, Korbee Leslie L

机构信息

a Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (MLC 5041), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA.

b Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Office of Research Compliance and Regulatory Affairs (MLC 7040) , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):173-181. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1577313. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1080/23294515.2019.1577313
PMID:31002290
Abstract

The consent process used in clinical research today falls markedly short of the ideal process envisioned nearly 30 years ago. Critics have suggested that the informed consent process has become challenging, formalistic, and incompletely understood by researchers and participants alike. Hence, the purpose of this pilot study was to identify and characterize important aspects of the informed consent process that teens believe impact their understanding of risks of participation in studies with genetic testing. The personal research experiences of 15 teens regarding consent/assent and research participation in studies with genetic testing were solicited through focus-group interviews. All participants had enrolled in at least one research study involving genetic testing in the prior 2 years. All groups were facilitated by the same experienced focus-group moderator. Themes and subthemes were identified, summarized, and interpreted using conventional qualitative content analysis. Three overarching themes emerged from the interviews: fear of what could happen, need for additional information regarding risks, and need for autonomy and decision-making control throughout the consent process. Results of this pilot study provide preliminary evidence that teens can identify and characterize key issues in the informed consent/assent process when it comes to the risks of research participation. These findings are consistent with other research regarding teens' perceptions and recommendations for genetic testing research.

摘要

当今临床研究中使用的同意程序明显低于近30年前设想的理想程序。批评者认为,知情同意程序变得具有挑战性、形式化,研究人员和参与者对此都没有完全理解。因此,这项试点研究的目的是确定并描述青少年认为会影响他们对参与基因检测研究风险理解的知情同意程序的重要方面。通过焦点小组访谈,征求了15名青少年关于同意/赞成以及参与基因检测研究的个人研究经历。所有参与者在过去两年中至少参加了一项涉及基因检测的研究。所有小组均由同一位经验丰富的焦点小组主持人主持。使用传统的定性内容分析法确定、总结并解释主题和子主题。访谈中出现了三个总体主题:对可能发生之事的恐惧、对风险的更多信息需求,以及在整个同意过程中对自主权和决策控制权的需求。这项试点研究的结果提供了初步证据,表明青少年在涉及参与研究风险的知情同意/赞成过程中能够识别并描述关键问题。这些发现与其他关于青少年对基因检测研究的看法和建议的研究一致。

相似文献

1
Older Teens' Understanding and Perceptions of Risks in Studies With Genetic Testing: A Pilot Study.青少年对基因检测研究中风险的理解与认知:一项初步研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):173-181. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1577313. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
2
A randomized study of a method for optimizing adolescent assent to biomedical research.一项优化青少年对生物医学研究同意的方法的随机研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):189-197. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1251507. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.约旦父母对儿科研究中知情同意/赞成的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Oct;12(4):261-268. doi: 10.1177/1556264617718937. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
4
Feasibility of an Assessment Tool for Children's Competence to Consent to Predictive Genetic Testing: a Pilot Study.儿童同意进行预测性基因检测能力评估工具的可行性:一项试点研究。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):971-7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9835-7. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
5
Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices.评估儿童参与研究的能力:对研究人员实践的描述性定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Aug;37(8):504-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040097. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
6
Children's Decision-Making Involvement About Research Participation: Associations With Perceived Fairness and Self-Efficacy.儿童对参与研究的决策参与:与感知公平和自我效能感的关联。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Apr;12(2):87-96. doi: 10.1177/1556264617696921. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.代理决策者在被征求患者参与研究同意时的经历。一项多中心研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):238-245. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-425OC.
8
Volunteer experiences and perceptions of the informed consent process: Lessons from two HIV clinical trials in Uganda.志愿者的经历与对知情同意过程的看法:来自乌干达两项HIV临床试验的经验教训
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 3;16(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0073-1.
9
Developing a new justification for assent.为同意制定新的理由。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jan 12;17:2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0085-x.
10
The challenge of community engagement and informed consent in rural Zambia: an example from a pilot study.赞比亚农村社区参与和知情同意的挑战:一项试点研究示例。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0382-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents.儿科癌症护理中的基因组测序研究:青少年和年轻人及其父母的决策、态度和感知效用。
Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101168. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101168. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
uConsent: Addressing the gap in measuring understanding of informed consent in clinical research.uConsent:解决临床研究中衡量知情同意理解度方面的差距。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec;16(12):2530-2542. doi: 10.1111/cts.13645. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
3
Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research.
青少年和青年癌症患者及其肿瘤学家对患者参与基因组研究的看法。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 Oct;12(5):773-781. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0066. Epub 2023 Jan 2.