Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Research Institute for Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul;44(4):612-618. doi: 10.1111/coa.13345. Epub 2019 May 6.
Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing practices in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPR) differ among physicians. We assessed the improvement in reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) after treating LPR with three different regimens.
A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.
Chungnam national university hospital in Korea.
From July 2015 to July 2017, 100 patients with LPR included in the study. The patients were prescribed one of the following regimens for 3 months: group A, ilaprazole 10 mg, once a day (QD), n = 29; group B, ilaprazole 10 mg, twice a day (BID), n = 27; and group C, ilaprazole 10 mg BID plus mosapride citrate 5 mg three times a day (TID), n = 44.
The total RSI and RFS scores and each subitems in RSI and FRS of the patients were evaluated.
Total RFS and RSI scores improved significantly at the 3-month follow-up in all groups, and the improvements were of similar magnitudes. Regarding the RFS, the degrees of improvement in vocal cord oedema (P = 0.002) and diffuse laryngeal oedema (P = 0.003) scores differed significantly among the three groups. Moreover, overweight or obese patients in group C showed the greatest improvement in RFS. However, age had no effect on treatment efficacy.
Three PPI therapeutic strategies showed similar efficacies against LPR according to total RFS and RSI scores. The addition of a prokinetic resulted in improvements in specific endoscopic findings, such as vocal cord oedema and diffuse laryngeal oedema. Furthermore, the addition of a prokinetic to PPI therapy was particularly beneficial for overweight or obese patients.
质子泵抑制剂(PPI)在治疗喉咽反流病(LPR)中的应用存在差异。我们评估了三种不同方案治疗 LPR 后反流症状指数(RSI)和反流性食管炎评分(RFS)的改善情况。
前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。
韩国忠南国立大学医院。
2015 年 7 月至 2017 年 7 月,纳入 100 例 LPR 患者。患者接受以下方案治疗 3 个月:A 组,艾普拉唑 10mg,每天一次(QD),n=29;B 组,艾普拉唑 10mg,每天两次(BID),n=27;C 组,艾普拉唑 10mg BID 加枸橼酸莫沙必利 5mg,每天三次(TID),n=44。
评估患者的总 RSI 和 RFS 评分以及 RSI 和 FRS 的各项亚项。
所有组在 3 个月随访时总 RFS 和 RSI 评分均显著改善,改善程度相似。在 RFS 方面,声带水肿(P=0.002)和弥漫性喉水肿(P=0.003)评分的改善程度在三组间差异有统计学意义。此外,C 组超重或肥胖患者的 RFS 改善最大。然而,年龄对治疗效果无影响。
根据总 RFS 和 RSI 评分,三种 PPI 治疗策略对 LPR 均具有相似的疗效。添加促动力药可改善声带水肿和弥漫性喉水肿等特定内镜表现。此外,PPI 联合促动力治疗对超重或肥胖患者尤其有益。