文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

每日两次与每日一次质子泵抑制剂给药方案对喉咽反流症状的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Ji Jeong-Yeon, Huh Gene, Ji Eunjeong, Lee Jin Yi, Kang Seung Heon, Cha Wonjae, Jeong Woo-Jin, Jung Young Ho

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Oct 30;30(4):459-467. doi: 10.5056/jnm23118. Epub 2024 Aug 14.


DOI:10.5056/jnm23118
PMID:39139030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11474552/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) play a crucial role in managing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the same total PPI dose administered twice daily versus once daily in LPR patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral hospital, enrolling a total of 132 patients aged 19 to 79 with LPR. These patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 10 mg twice daily (BID) or a 20 mg once daily (QD) dose of ilaprazole for 12 weeks. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) were assessed at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RSI response, defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the total RSI score from baseline. We also analyzed the efficacy of the dosing regimens and the impact of dosing and duration on treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The BID group did not display a higher response rate for RSI than the QD group. The changes in total RSI scores at the 8-week and 16- week visits showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total RFS alterations were also comparable between both groups. Each dosing regimen demonstrated significant decreases in RSI and RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Both BID and QD PPI dosing regimens improved subjective symptom scores and objective laryngoscopic findings. There was no significant difference in RSI improvement between the 2 dosing regimens, indicating that either dosing regimen could be considered a viable treatment option.

摘要

背景/目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在治疗喉咽反流(LPR)中起着关键作用,但最佳给药方案仍不明确。我们旨在比较在LPR患者中,每日两次给予相同总剂量PPI与每日一次给药的有效性。 方法:我们在一家三级转诊医院进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,共纳入132例年龄在19至79岁之间的LPR患者。这些患者被随机分配接受每日两次10毫克(BID)或每日一次20毫克(QD)的艾普拉唑治疗12周。在第8周和第16周评估反流症状指数(RSI)和反流发现评分(RFS)。主要终点是RSI反应,定义为总RSI评分较基线降低50%或更多。我们还分析了给药方案的疗效以及给药方式和疗程对治疗结果的影响。 结果:每日两次给药组的RSI反应率并不高于每日一次给药组。在第8周和第16周访视时,两组的总RSI评分变化无显著差异。两组的总RFS变化也相当。每种给药方案的RSI和RFS均显著降低。 结论:每日两次和每日一次的PPI给药方案均改善了主观症状评分和客观喉镜检查结果。两种给药方案在RSI改善方面无显著差异,表明两种给药方案均可被视为可行的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/891225baf290/jnm-30-4-459-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/9d72d7deed0e/jnm-30-4-459-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/891225baf290/jnm-30-4-459-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/9d72d7deed0e/jnm-30-4-459-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/891225baf290/jnm-30-4-459-f2.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024-10-30

[2]
Efficacy of three proton-pump inhibitor therapeutic strategies on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease; a prospective randomized double-blind study.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2019-5-6

[3]
Magnesium alginate versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022-5

[4]
Influence of age on treatment with proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a prospective multicenter study.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013-12

[5]
Clinical Evaluation of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and its Response to Proton Pump Inhibitors.

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023-6

[6]
Laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of proton-pump inhibitor therapy and pretherapy predictors of response.

Laryngoscope. 2005-7

[7]
The Role of Empirical Treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitor as a Diagnostic Tool in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022-10

[8]
Rethinking the laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment algorithm: Evaluating an alternate empiric dosing regimen and considering up-front, pH-impedance, and manometry testing to minimize cost in treating suspect laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Laryngoscope. 2017-10

[9]
Efficacy of anti-reflux surgery on refractory laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in professional voice users: a pilot study.

J Voice. 2014-7

[10]
Relationship between extralaryngeal endoscopic findings, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) response, and pH measures in suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Dis Esophagus. 2019-4-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Best Practices in Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Multidisciplinary Modified Delphi Study.

Dig Dis Sci. 2023-4

[2]
Adherence and Persistence with Once-Daily vs Twice-Daily Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Analyses from the Netherlands, Italy and Germany.

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022-6

[3]
ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2022-1-1

[4]
Use of proton pump inhibitors to treat persistent throat symptoms: multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.

BMJ. 2021-1-7

[5]
Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Around the World: An International Study.

Laryngoscope. 2021-5

[6]
Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. A Systematic Review.

J Voice. 2020-11

[7]
Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019-2-12

[8]
Proton pump inhibitors: Review of reported risks and controversies.

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018-10-19

[9]
Clinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laryngoscope. 2019-5

[10]
Modeling the impact of real-world adherence to once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on stroke and major bleeding events among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2018-10-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索