• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日两次与每日一次质子泵抑制剂给药方案对喉咽反流症状的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Ji Jeong-Yeon, Huh Gene, Ji Eunjeong, Lee Jin Yi, Kang Seung Heon, Cha Wonjae, Jeong Woo-Jin, Jung Young Ho

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Oct 30;30(4):459-467. doi: 10.5056/jnm23118. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

DOI:10.5056/jnm23118
PMID:39139030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11474552/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) play a crucial role in managing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the same total PPI dose administered twice daily versus once daily in LPR patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral hospital, enrolling a total of 132 patients aged 19 to 79 with LPR. These patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 10 mg twice daily (BID) or a 20 mg once daily (QD) dose of ilaprazole for 12 weeks. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) were assessed at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RSI response, defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the total RSI score from baseline. We also analyzed the efficacy of the dosing regimens and the impact of dosing and duration on treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

The BID group did not display a higher response rate for RSI than the QD group. The changes in total RSI scores at the 8-week and 16- week visits showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total RFS alterations were also comparable between both groups. Each dosing regimen demonstrated significant decreases in RSI and RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both BID and QD PPI dosing regimens improved subjective symptom scores and objective laryngoscopic findings. There was no significant difference in RSI improvement between the 2 dosing regimens, indicating that either dosing regimen could be considered a viable treatment option.

摘要

背景/目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在治疗喉咽反流(LPR)中起着关键作用,但最佳给药方案仍不明确。我们旨在比较在LPR患者中,每日两次给予相同总剂量PPI与每日一次给药的有效性。

方法

我们在一家三级转诊医院进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,共纳入132例年龄在19至79岁之间的LPR患者。这些患者被随机分配接受每日两次10毫克(BID)或每日一次20毫克(QD)的艾普拉唑治疗12周。在第8周和第16周评估反流症状指数(RSI)和反流发现评分(RFS)。主要终点是RSI反应,定义为总RSI评分较基线降低50%或更多。我们还分析了给药方案的疗效以及给药方式和疗程对治疗结果的影响。

结果

每日两次给药组的RSI反应率并不高于每日一次给药组。在第8周和第16周访视时,两组的总RSI评分变化无显著差异。两组的总RFS变化也相当。每种给药方案的RSI和RFS均显著降低。

结论

每日两次和每日一次的PPI给药方案均改善了主观症状评分和客观喉镜检查结果。两种给药方案在RSI改善方面无显著差异,表明两种给药方案均可被视为可行的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/891225baf290/jnm-30-4-459-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/9d72d7deed0e/jnm-30-4-459-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/891225baf290/jnm-30-4-459-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/9d72d7deed0e/jnm-30-4-459-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4865/11474552/891225baf290/jnm-30-4-459-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.每日两次与每日一次质子泵抑制剂给药方案对喉咽反流症状的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Oct 30;30(4):459-467. doi: 10.5056/jnm23118. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Efficacy of three proton-pump inhibitor therapeutic strategies on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease; a prospective randomized double-blind study.三种质子泵抑制剂治疗策略对咽喉反流病的疗效:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul;44(4):612-618. doi: 10.1111/coa.13345. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Magnesium alginate versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.藻酸镁与质子泵抑制剂治疗咽喉反流的比较:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;279(5):2533-2542. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07219-0. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
4
Influence of age on treatment with proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a prospective multicenter study.年龄对喉咽反流病患者质子泵抑制剂治疗的影响:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;139(12):1291-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5556.
5
Clinical Evaluation of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and its Response to Proton Pump Inhibitors.喉咽反流的临床评估及其对质子泵抑制剂的反应
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):409-415. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03219-6. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
Laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of proton-pump inhibitor therapy and pretherapy predictors of response.喉咽反流:评估质子泵抑制剂治疗最佳剂量及治疗前反应预测因素的前瞻性队列研究。
Laryngoscope. 2005 Jul;115(7):1230-8. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163746.81766.45.
7
The Role of Empirical Treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitor as a Diagnostic Tool in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.质子泵抑制剂经验性治疗作为喉咽反流诊断工具的作用
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1744-1751. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01750-7. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Rethinking the laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment algorithm: Evaluating an alternate empiric dosing regimen and considering up-front, pH-impedance, and manometry testing to minimize cost in treating suspect laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.重新思考喉咽反流治疗方案:评估一种替代的经验性给药方案,并考虑采用预先的pH阻抗测试和测压测试,以尽量降低疑似喉咽反流疾病的治疗成本。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127 Suppl 6:S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.26806. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
Efficacy of anti-reflux surgery on refractory laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in professional voice users: a pilot study.抗反流手术对职业用嗓者难治性喉咽反流病的疗效:一项初步研究。
J Voice. 2014 Jul;28(4):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.009. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
Relationship between extralaryngeal endoscopic findings, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) response, and pH measures in suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.疑似喉咽反流中喉内镜检查结果、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)反应与 pH 值测量的关系。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Apr 1;32(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy072.

本文引用的文献

1
Best Practices in Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Multidisciplinary Modified Delphi Study.喉咽反流病治疗的最佳实践:一项多学科改良德尔菲研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1125-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07672-9. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Adherence and Persistence with Once-Daily vs Twice-Daily Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Analyses from the Netherlands, Italy and Germany.房颤患者中每日一次与每日两次直接口服抗凝剂的依从性和持续性:来自荷兰、意大利和德国的真实世界分析。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022 Jun;9(2):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s40801-021-00289-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
美国胃肠病学会胃食管反流病诊断和管理临床指南
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):27-56. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538.
4
Use of proton pump inhibitors to treat persistent throat symptoms: multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.质子泵抑制剂治疗持续性咽喉症状的多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 7;372:m4903. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4903.
5
Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Around the World: An International Study.喉咽反流的全球管理:一项国际研究。
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):E1589-E1597. doi: 10.1002/lary.29270. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. A Systematic Review.质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流:系统评价。
J Voice. 2020 Nov;34(6):918-929. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review.喉咽反流病的评估和管理:最新综述。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May;160(5):762-782. doi: 10.1177/0194599819827488. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Proton pump inhibitors: Review of reported risks and controversies.质子泵抑制剂:已报道风险与争议综述
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Oct 19;3(6):457-462. doi: 10.1002/lio2.187. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Clinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.喉咽反流治疗的临床结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Laryngoscope. 2019 May;129(5):1174-1187. doi: 10.1002/lary.27591. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
10
Modeling the impact of real-world adherence to once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on stroke and major bleeding events among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients.建立模型以评估非瓣膜性心房颤动患者真实世界中每日一次(QD)与每日两次(BID)服用非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的依从性对卒中与大出血事件的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Apr;35(4):653-660. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1530205. Epub 2018 Oct 30.